Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
Jul 23 @ 9:34 PM ET
Oh look. The twat can't handle people having a different opinion than him. How shocking.
But he'll argue for hours. For pages. And convince nobody his point of view is the right one. Such productivity. What a life one must lead to waste so much time accomplishing nothing.
Oh look. The twat can't handle people having a different opinion than him. How shocking.
But he'll argue for hours. For pages. And convince nobody his point of view is the right one. Such productivity. What a life one must lead to waste so much time accomplishing nothing. - systemtool
No, Lehtonen and Mason have actually been much better for much longer. They've both been starters in the NHL, something none of the current Leafs back-ups have done successfully.
Lehtonen and Mason didn't play for defensive juggernauts either. And again, Pickard's sample size is a joke compared to two guys who played 400-600 games as starters. - Unholy_Goalie
Yes. The Leafs don't need to blow $2M in cap for a question mark or the potential for a marginal improvement in their back-up, and even then it might not happen.
For someone accuses people of being selective in their arguments and who likes throw stats around, you saying "Lehtonen and Mason have actually been much better for much longer" is simply not true. In both cases , their career numbers, as well as their current situations prove that.
[url]
We're done. Enough time has already been wasted on you.
Get rid of two of them. Keep Pickard as the AHL starter, trade Sparks and McElhinney and sign Lehtonen or Mason to a 1 year deal. Problem solved. - Unholy_Goalie
yes, you are correct. What about the years after that?
yes, I know, they can always sign someone else.
Also less proven which is why the veteran, former starters would be the more reliable option. It's far from irrelevant. Just because you got backed into a corner of your own illogical thoughts doesn't mean it's irrelevant.
Ryan Miller was a starter for the majority of his career and last year became a back-up in Anaheim. He had a great year and played 28 games which kept Gibson from doing what Andersen had to do last year. - Unholy_Goalie
Yea the real reliable option of Steve Mason who had a losing record on one of the top teams in the league who's starter led the league in wins. Yea that reliable guy.
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
Jul 23 @ 10:12 PM ET
Yes. The Leafs don't need to blow $2M in cap for a question mark or the potential for a marginal improvement in their back-up, and even then it might not happen. - As_I_See_It
They have the cap space, they'd almost be stupid not to upgrade their back-up options given how much rubber Andersen faced last year.
For someone accuses people of being selective in their arguments and who likes throw stats around, you saying "Lehtonen and Mason have actually been much better for much longer" is simply not true. In both cases , their career numbers, as well as their current situations prove that.
Lehtonen and Mason > Pickard, Sparks, McElhinney. Fact.
Why are we so concerned with the amount of games a potential backup played as a starter? - burn
Well, let me tell you a story about my uncle jed, he said that if the goalie get hit with this rube puck thingy and plays a bunch of games, like 66 out 82. He'll be tired for the playoffs and the Leafs would not advanced pass the 1st round.
Now there another tail of the untrusted the Leafs currently have and that's all I'm going to say on that ... want some chocolates ....
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
Jul 23 @ 10:13 PM ET
Yea the real reliable option of Steve Mason who had a losing record on one of the top teams in the league who's starter led the league in wins. Yea that reliable guy. - harps43
Still proven more as an NHL goalie than the options the Leafs currently have. And Mason was injured last year, not for a lack of ability.
Lehtonen and Mason > Pickard, Sparks, McElhinney. Fact.
Arguable, and even if they are definitively better, it isn't worth the contract spot and cap space. Leafs need to save cap for the ELC bonuses so they don't get pushed into next year when the cap crunch actually happens.
Still proven more as an NHL goalie than the options the Leafs currently have. And Mason was injured last year, not for a lack of ability. - Unholy_Goalie
He gave up 5 goals a game every game for the first week until the Peg gave up on him because he was trash.
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON Joined: 08.23.2006
Jul 23 @ 10:15 PM ET
Why are we so concerned with the amount of games a potential backup played as a starter? - burn
Ryan Miller was a starter for years and became a very effective back-up last year. It's showing that they are capable NHL goalies compared to three guys who have been journeyman back-ups, AHLers or borderline NHLers.