You realize that of the final 4 teams only 3 of the dmen were shorter than 6’1”. Subban at 6ft 220 Orlov 5’11”212 and Ellis.
Small puck movers are a myth
- stevefrmglencoe
Well, you missed two - Morrissey (6'0" 194) and Kempny (6'0" 194). No really light guys outside of Ellis, though, yes, and only two were 5'11" or less.
Genuine question, what do you consider to be small? The average d-man was 6'0.3" and 203.2 lbs last season (of those who played at least 30 games). It's the second year in which d-men have been under 6'1" on average across the league and the weight of d-men has been on steady decline for years, though being sub 190 is still the minority, for sure. The most common span for size in the NHL the last 3 seasons has been 5'11"-6'2" and 195-205. Above and below this are less typical.
Let's break it down for top pairing d-men.
- 18 d-men are 6'0" or shorter. 8 are 5'11" or shorter and 10 are 6'0". 1 was 5'9".
- 6'1", 6'2" and 6'3" were the most common heights with 12, 12, and 11 players respectfully.
- 9 d-men are 6'4" or taller. 5 are 6'4" and 5 were 6'5" or taller. 1 was 6'9".
So, going by your statement that implied 6'0" is "small", then almost a third of top pairing d-men are small / short, so not a myth if that's your standard. Personally, I think 5'11" should be the start of "short", which is still not common at the top pairing level (only 12.9%).
But interestingly, there was only one more really tall (6'4"+) top pairing d-men than there were short (5'11" or less). Still, over half the top pairing d-man this last year were what most would consider average tall (6'1-6'3") - about 56.5% to be exact. So at least for last season, top pairing d-men are conclusively taller than league average (though to note, top 4 is closer to LA).
Let's now look at weight! I broke them down by 10 spans.
- 15 d-men were 194 or below Of those, 7 were below 190 (so 189 or less). 2 are less than 180.
- 22 d-men were between 195-205.
- 14 d-men were between 206-215.
- 11 d-men were 215 or more. Of those, 6 are above 225. 2 are 250+.
I'm not sure what everyone considered light but it ultimately breaks down about 60% of the league is 205 or lighter. If you split it based on league average, it'd break down a little differently - about 47% would be 203 or lighter. Still, about a 4th of the top pairing d-men are 194 or lighter, which has grown a good bit in the last 3-5 years.
And like with height, the lightest and heaviest groups are pretty similar in numbers - only a difference of 1 between the sub 194 and 215+ groups totals and there are 2 examples of extremes.
I'll note that there are a handful of guys who are tall but light (194 or lighter, 6'1" or taller = Klingberg, Brodie, Karlsson, Keith, DeKeyser, Schmidt) but only a few shorter but heavier guys (206+, 6'0" or shorter = Orlov, Subban, McAvoy).
Blackhawks defense as it stands, they Keith and Gus that could be small/light as described above. Then they have two average sized d-man and 2 heavier d-men. Now, if they bring up a kid or something, this could change, but all and all, pretty balanced in terms of size/height with only one extreme (Gus's weight). Now skill / defensive ability... that's a story for another night.
Keith 6'1" 192
Seabrook 6'3" 220
Murphy 6'4" 212
Rutta 6'3" 198
Manning 6'1" 205
Gustafsson 6'0" 176
And if you look at prospects that might make the team this season, there's also a variety / balance to them. I took from NHL and the player's NCAA pages first, though some differ. Icehogs page seems to defer to wiki but those are sometimes drastically different from what NHL or NCAA said (like Gibert 220 vs 198, the latter of which was his draft weight so I believe it's out of date).
Anyway, there are 3 that are lighter but not really short. The other two are tall / heavy.
Jokiharju 6'0" 187
Forsling 6'0" 186
Hillman 6'1" 188
Gilbert 6'2" 220
Dahlstrom 6'4" 223
tl;dr it depends on what you mean by small when you claim small d-men are a myth but the trend of d-men getting smaller is factually true - league-wise and in terms of top pairs. Doesn't mean the Hawks and other teams shouldn't shoot for balance in terms of size, though.
As always, please excuse typos and rambley mess of sentences - I am on a lot of caffeine and sugar rn. This will be my only huge ass post in a while, I think.