You, Saver and NYRangers8675309 just need to smoke a peace pipe together and be done with it.
- Pete V

I'm not mad. I actually know what 9479 is about he wants the Rangers to be differnet, different then what they were last year. Which was somewhat boring and bad. I jus don't agree with him on what he wants moving forward.

The comment section is best when we are arguing about something.

But over the last month, it's just been a constant stream of boring, non-consequential little b*tch fights.

You haven't been around much Oldschool (at least I don't think, I've been off as well), but it's just usually 3-4 people arguing amongst each other about the same damn type of thing every day.
- Pete V

People’s opinions should be respected, even if they’re not in agreement with others. Making disparaging remarks about “old men” etc. is desrespectful and childish. We should be able to all drink from the well, after all, we are not communists.

I was thinking more of a gangbang, but your idea works too.


Anyway I'm out for the weekend, you gents have fun.
- mdw7413

"I'm here for the gangbang."

The comment section is best when we are arguing about something.

But over the last month, it's just been a constant stream of boring, non-consequential little b*tch fights.

You haven't been around much Oldschool (at least I don't think, I've been off as well), but it's just usually 3-4 people arguing amongst each other about the same damn type of thing every day.
- Pete V

It starts #1 with tom who tries to TWIST everyone's comments to make them say what he wants them to be interpreted as, to make him look like he is ONLY RIGHT, and then mock others with words and immature "gif" logos.
There's no better proof, Pete, than right on this blog's comments, in which he took in part, my initial post on Gorton & Hank, and tried saying through many posts that I was wrong in mentioning FIRST today, that Hank IN HAVING AN NMC, refused Gorton's offer to be dealt at last season's deadline to a Cup contender by not waiving the clause. He went as far as in one post, saying, "WRONG AGAIN, SAVER", and adding the link to the NY POST article of back then, showing EXACTLY WHAT I INITIALLY WROTE THERE, that Hank was the one who refused to waive his NMC to go to a Cup contender last February.

Hey, don't be making fun of the double blades! I had to use those when i was like 5.
- mdw7413

According to word posted earlier here, tom may only be age 7 still. But that's in his maturity level of instigating havoc on this site.

Step away for a bit due to work and the site goes to hell in a hand basket again.

Step away for a bit due to work and the site goes to hell in a hand basket again.
- airjan23

I blame McCLeod

You, Saver and NYRangers8675309 just need to smoke a peace pipe together and be done with it.
- Pete V

Tom just starts arguments over every comma put in the wrong place. Try and have a discussion and he turns it into an argument. I’m convinced, he’s not a Rangers fan, he’s a troll.

Step away for a bit due to work and the site goes to hell in a hand basket again.
- airjan23

I'm sorry Jan for trying to use as usual a PROFESSIONAL comment as my first one today, in making a sensible thought on Hank's status, & Gorton's thus far, off season inactivity moves wise, and why if this is predominantly going to be a kids roster under a 100% rebuild, then how come it doesn't include the starting goal position. But it was not liked as usual by a certain someone who's ideas of building a Cup Winner are through a century worth of TANKING. You yourself brought up first the other day on an earlier blog, the possibility of it maybe being time to trade Hank, based on Gorton's lack of free agents and trades made to use the cap space created, as he said he would do earlier. That's why I brought it up here.
I didn't see tom reply to you there obnoxiously like he did to me, starting off with "Hank has a NMC", which I had originally posted. Then some complain about the length of my comments? Tom is the main reason why you have to be greater specific IN LENGTH to make your points, even though he doesn't know how to read and interpret them properly in comprehension.
Then tom started me off once again in what I wrote in my reply to Pete, and then further went on as "oldschool" had mentioned.
I don't need to waste my time in ONLY taking his crap in always TWISTING every one's comments to make him look like he is "MR. RIGHT" ALWAYS, and then use immature "gif" logos as well. He give it first ... then he take it back.

Tom just starts arguments over every comma put in the wrong place. Try and have a discussion and he turns it into an argument. I’m convinced, he’s not a Rangers fan, he’s a troll.
- nyrangers9479

I said it first last during last season that the scope and nature of his comments make him a troll here, and none more than his constant "TANKING" mentioned, and him likely being a Devils troll, since there's little there for him to instigate in comments and members daily.

"I'm here for the gangbang."
- tomburton99

You are a sick person, tanker.
You also said yesterday at 3:51 pm on Jan's prior blog, in reply to some member saying, "I'm done", likely due to Gorton re-signing McLeod, in YOUR EXACT WRITTEN WORDS, "I'm telling you man, the world is much more fun place when wanting to see it burn".
That ridiculous comment shows the type of person you are in a nutshell.

(You even left out the separate letter in "a", in between the words, "is" and "much", for the way you get on my writing.)

You are a sick person, tanker.
You also said yesterday at 3:51 pm on Jan's prior blog, in reply to some member saying, "I'm done", likely due to Gorton re-signing McLeod, in YOUR EXACT WRITTEN WORDS, "I'm telling you man, the world is much more fun place when wanting to see it burn".
That ridiculous comment shows the type of person you are in a nutshell.

(You even left out the separate letter in "a", in between the words, "is" and "much", for the way you get on my writing.)
- RangerSaver

you two really just need to (frank) already.

The problem here is, you’re not allowed to have a different opinion or view point than the usual suspects here.
- OLDSCHOOL#6

you. YOU have the "opinion" that because you hate Lundqvist's contract NOW that he was the reason that we didn't beat the Kings in the finals.

And, there is no defending that opinion. Only an absolute moron would believe that.

People’s opinions should be respected, even if they’re not in agreement with others. Making disparaging remarks about “old men” etc. is desrespectful and childish. We should be able to all drink from the well, after all, we are not communists.
- OLDSCHOOL#6

listen, if your opinion is to always rip on Lundqvist and change history that he was the reason we didn't win it all, then I will NEVER respect your opinion.

I'll die on that hill defending Lundqvist.

You hate a Ranger legend. I love him.

Nothing to do with being an "old man" or not.

That is the sides that you and I have my friend.

listen, if your opinion is to always rip on Lundqvist and change history that he was the reason we didn't win it all, then I will NEVER respect your opinion.

I'll die on that hill defending Lundqvist.

You hate a Ranger legend. I love him.

Nothing to do with being an "old man" or not.

That the sides that you and I have my friend.
- jimbro83

listen, if your opinion is to always rip on Lundqvist and change history that he was the reason we didn't win it all, then I will NEVER respect your opinion.

I'll die on that hill defending Lundqvist.

You hate a Ranger legend. I love him.

Nothing to do with being an "old man" or not.

That is the sides that you and I have my friend.
- jimbro83

My point was then, as it is now, when it came time for the franchise saving stop, he didn’t. Not blaming him for the defeat, never did.

you. YOU have the "opinion" that because you hate Lundqvist's contract NOW that he was the reason that we didn't beat the Kings in the finals.

And, there is no defending that opinion. Only an absolute moron would believe that.
- jimbro83

And for the record, I never liked the contract. Goalie should never be the highest paid player on the team, and yes that’s my opinion.

And for the record, I never liked the contract. Goalie should never be the highest paid player on the team, and yes that’s my opinion.
- OLDSCHOOL#6

But you hate him because mgmt gave him a lot of money. That’s like 9479 hating Nam because he was traded for his favorite player. It’s almost child like

But you hate him because mgmt gave him a lot of money. That’s like 9479 hating Nam because he was traded for his favorite player. It’s almost child like
- Slimtj100

Listen, I do NOT hate him. Good God, does anybody read the post.

When he plays I root for him because I’m a Ranger fan foremost, that doesn’t mean I can’t hate his contract, and the fact that the organization has given too much power for a player.

Listen, I do NOT hate him. Good God, does anybody read the post.

When he plays I root for him because I’m a Ranger fan foremost, that doesn’t mean I can’t hate his contract, and the fact that the organization has given too much power for a player.
- OLDSCHOOL#6

Say it’s not his fault then. He’s basically been the reason this franchise has had any success the last decade plus

He bailed his teammates out WAAAAAAAY more then his teammates bailed him out over the years. How could you forget the numerous game 7s. By the way, this is why I have zero respect for you...all you do is come on here and bash him in one way or another. Your a fool oldman

But you hate him because mgmt gave him a lot of money. That’s like 9479 hating Nam because he was traded for his favorite player. It’s almost child like
- Slimtj100

I don’t hate Nam bc of that, he’s just not good and he’s redundant on this team. Nam Vesey Spooner Fast etc.

I can’t believe i agree with you!! Lol

I understand the picking up salaries thing, but to a point. Picking up Ryan’s deal is a little to crazy for my liking

Deangelo shouldn’t get much btw, if he’s even around after next year
- Slimtj100

DeAngelo still developing. Give him a full year, I think he’s got more skill than Pionk

I don’t hate Nam bc of that, he’s just not good and he’s redundant on this team. Nam Vesey Spooner Fast etc.
- nyrangers9479

I get your argument that, the Rangers have a glut of 3rd/2nd line players, and we keep adding more, instead of going after the true first line sniper or center, like stocking up on LHD. But, until I see Fast, on the top line, for at least 15 consecutive games, this season is a bust.

DeAngelo still developing. Give him a full year, I think he’s got more skill than Pionk
- junaka3

https://www.eliteprospect...layer/89818/tony-deangelo

No they still have plenty.

https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/goldenknights
- tomburton99

Sir, I don’t just pull comments out my ass... I look at cap friendly all the time. W. Karlsson wil probably get a long term deal over 5. Theodore needs contract too. Schmidt next year. If they’re looking to trade for EK, I don’t see space being there.