1. Don’t believe Boston’s addition of Nick Holden prevents them from adding another current Rangers defender. Question is whether or not the Bruins are willing to take the plunge.
Can’t pin it down, but there also appears to be Western Conference interest in Ryan McDonagh.
2. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Jason Mackey reported on Michael Grabner as the Penguins’ target, which makes a lot of sense as he fits their speedy winger profile.
Mackey wondered if the Rangers would refuse to trade with the Penguins but I don’t think that’s the case. If Daniel Sprong was available, why wouldn’t someone consider it?
1. Don’t believe Boston’s addition of Nick Holden prevents them from adding another current Rangers defender. Question is whether or not the Bruins are willing to take the plunge.
Can’t pin it down, but there also appears to be Western Conference interest in Ryan McDonagh.
2. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Jason Mackey reported on Michael Grabner as the Penguins’ target, which makes a lot of sense as he fits their speedy winger profile.
Mackey wondered if the Rangers would refuse to trade with the Penguins but I don’t think that’s the case. If Daniel Sprong was available, why wouldn’t someone consider it? - airjan23
Holden is a depth trade. Mac would fit in perfectly in Boston.
Grabs goes to Pitt and they make a run (Gods forbid they 3-peat), forget everything he said about wanting to stay in NY. Might get a good deal on Hags, though.
Holden is a depth trade. Mac would fit in perfectly in Boston.
Grabs goes to Pitt and they make a run (Gods forbid they 3-peat), forget everything he said about wanting to stay in NY. Might get a good deal on Hags, though. - Fenrir