|
|
I also recognized Bouchard as a favorable option when the latest prospect rankings came out.
- Supposedly he can shoot the puck and score from the blueline. Remember those days?
- Sounds like he reads the play well and is effective at both ends of the ice. Not just defensive with a total lack of point production or offensive but a liability in his own end.
- Apparently he's a great skater and quite mobile.
- He's not a Smurf and can play with a bit of an edge.
We don't just need D prospects. We need several that fit this profile. - YeOldTimer
|
|
|
|
You want to draft Engelland high in the second round? 😕 - manvanfan
Yes He is a tough defensive Dman something this team really really really really needs |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Demko with SO.
The North wins the AHL Allstar final |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
Yes He is a tough defensive Dman something this team really really really really needs - VANTEL
How is his skating though? No point in a big tough Dman if he can't catch anyone. |
|
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
How is his skating though? No point in a big tough Dman if he can't catch anyone. - Retinalz
The dime a dozen variety... no thx lol |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Logan Stanley - VANTEL
Codes has already said Logan Stanley won't ever be a top 4. I would rather someone with top 4 or a top 6 F potential with a high second. If Van gets another 2nd. Sure. Rasanen went 59th last year. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Yes He is a tough defensive Dman something this team really really really really needs - VANTEL
You can easily sign those types as UFA’s or trade for them without giving up a 2nd
Pit won 2 cups with Ian Cole being their toughest dman. He’s available through trade right now and a potential UFA this summer.
Or pay Try in 2019 |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
You can easily sign those types as UFA’s or trade for them without giving up a 2nd
Pit won 2 cups with Ian Cole being their toughest dman. He’s available through trade right now and a potential UFA this summer.
Or pay Try in 2019 - Nucker101
Ian cole was a 1st rounder |
|
|
|
Codes has already said Logan Stanley won't ever be a top 4. I would rather someone with top 4 or a top 6 F potential with a high second. If Van gets another 2nd. Sure. Rasanen went 59th last year. - manvanfan
Bouchard would be your top 4 Bahl is projected 5/6 I keep repeating it is for the toughness. There are no projected top 4 at pick 33 |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Gudbranson traded yet? - Nucker101
Deal fell through, his balls were too big to fit in the Toronto locker room |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Ian cole was a 1st rounder  - manvanfan
Exactly. Yet despite developing well enough to make the NHL he was traded for a bottom pairing dman(Bortuzzo) and a 7th round pick. And he was 26 years old.
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Bouchard would be your top 4 Bahl is projected 5/6 I keep repeating it is for the toughness. There are no projected top 4 at pick 33 - VANTEL
There’s plenty of top 4 dmen that were drafted in round 2.
Isn’t Benning supposed to be good enough to find them? |
|
|
|
You can easily sign those types as UFA’s or trade for them without giving up a 2nd
Pit won 2 cups with Ian Cole being their toughest dman. He’s available through trade right now and a potential UFA this summer.
Or pay Try in 2019 - Nucker101
The scouts project him at 33 or so but the Hockey Buzz experts say no |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Deal fell through, his balls were too big to fit in the Toronto locker room - 1970vintage
The deal included Sutter? |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Gudbranson traded yet? - Nucker101
On that topic...
Resigned if not traded.
He needs to want to be here & a fair price.
Idk if thats likely hence a TDL move likely.
If signed then my Q is who is ondeck? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
The scouts project him at 33 or so but the Hockey Buzz experts say no  - VANTEL
Haven’t seen the kid play to comment. I’m just saying, I think it’s stupid to draft guys who project to be depth players that high in the draft. It’s easy to find 3rd liners and 5/6 dmen so draft for upside. That’s what teams like Tampa do. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
On that topic...
Resigned if not traded.
He needs to want to be here & a fair price.
Idk if thats likely hence a TDL move likely.
If signed then my Q is who is ondeck? - Nighthawk
Wouldn’t be surprised if he’s traded for a prospect or young roster player. Benning has traded for way more prospects/projects than picks so far. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Bouchard would be your top 4 Bahl is projected 5/6 I keep repeating it is for the toughness. There are no projected top 4 at pick 33 - VANTEL
No rush to pick bottom pairing D if they even make the NHL. Better for the 3rd round & beyond. Early 2nd is BPA/need depending on who falls to us. I do believe we will get avery good prospect. |
|
|
|
Haven’t seen the kid play to comment. I’m just saying, I think it’s stupid to draft guys who project to be depth players that high in the draft. It’s easy to find 3rd liners and 5/6 dmen so draft for upside. That’s what teams like Tampa do. - Nucker101
Ranked #45 by Future Considerations
Ranked #30 by NHL Central Scouting |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I’m projecting a good F to drop to us in the 2nd. I wish it were a D but i don’t think we will luck out just my $.02. |
|
|
|
No rush to pick bottom pairing D if they even make the NHL. Better for the 3rd round & beyond. Early 2nd is BPA/need depending on who falls to us. I do believe we will get avery good prospect. - Nighthawk
You guys can choose who you want I want Bahl |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
 |
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
The deal included Sutter?  - Nucker101
Every deal includes Sutter |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
You guys can choose who you want I want Bahl - VANTEL
Thats cool but i see the draft playing out differently. JB should mine for D the 3rd round on. |
|