boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I don't want to put my hopes on a lottery ball so I hope we take Evan Bouchard as a realistic possibility.
Tree OJ Bouchard Holms Hutton Stecher Pouliot in the near future and maybe Rathbone - VANTEL
We can realistically expect a upgrade via trade or signing in that group as well.
|
|
|
|
Benching even ones own body weight 15 times is very very impressive. - manvanfan
Maybe he will be a Swedish hitman like Edler |
|
|
|
We can realistically expect a upgrade via trade or signing in that group as well. - boonerbuck
For who |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I think he is too slow but they should give him a shot at least 👍🏻 - CanuckDon
Dorsett wasn't very fast. He could overcome being a bit slower with great positioning and his long reach. |
|
|
|
This is just for amusement- trade value of our roster
Hank untradeable
Danny untradeable
Eriksson untradeable
Edler untradeable
Nilsson scraps
Markstrom 3 or 4
Granlund 3
Baertschi 2
Dowd AHL player
Gaunce scraps
Sutter high end second and prospect
Tavev a first and high prospect
Gudbrandson 2 or 3
Hutton 2 or 3
Vanek 3
Biega scraps but I like him
Stecher 2
Gagner 5
MDZ 3 or 2
Pouliot 4 or 5
Jake high second or prospect looking for new start
Bo first plus plus
Boeser top player
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
"And that’s where it gets tricky because depth guys – and I mean depth – like seven/eight defencemen, they’re relatively easy to grab a hold of via trade or even waivers. But that’s not what Toronto needs.
“What Toronto needs, is a solid No. 5 and maybe that player surfaces between now and the trade deadline, but there’s no guarantee of that.”
Gudbranson! JB get on the phone. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
This is just for amusement- trade value of our roster
Hank untradeable
Danny untradeable
Eriksson untradeable
Edler untradeable
Nilsson scraps
Markstrom 3 or 4
Granlund 3
Baertschi 2
Dowd AHL player
Gaunce scraps
Sutter high end second and prospect
Tavev a first and high prospect
Gudbrandson 2 or 3
Hutton 2 or 3
Vanek 3
Biega scraps but I like him
Stecher 2
Gagner 5
MDZ 3 or 2
Pouliot 4 or 5
Jake high second or prospect looking for new start
Bo first plus plus
Boeser top player - VANTEL
Yup - pretty accurate. That’s one depressing pile of trash |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
For who  - VANTEL
Hard to say since we are talking about the future.
Since you were talking post 2018 draft moving forward in the post I quoted, we may be at some point trading O for D depending on what happens at the TDL, drafting and UFA's.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Dorsett wasn't very fast. He could overcome being a bit slower with great positioning and his long reach.  - manvanfan
I thought he had pretty good wheels actually. He's a short shift player though.
|
|
|
|
Yup - pretty accurate. That’s one depressing pile of trash - CanuckDon
It really is and that is why I think a new GM should get here soon  Poor Benning gets the heat |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
according to J.D. Burke of The Athletic (subscription required). The scribe begins by pointing out that the Sedin’s decision will have major implications to the salary cap and the look of the team. The cost to retain both soon-to-be 38-year-old forwards will be about $10MM, estimates Burke, who adds the team would have to make a decision whether to keep Vanek with the team.
If the Sedin’s stay, will Benning look for assets that might benefit the veteran Sedins, rather than focus on the team’s need to rebuild. FFS |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
It really is and that is why I think a new GM should get here soon Poor Benning gets the heat - VANTEL
When you try and please aqua man and the Sedin's I don't see how he could do his job properly. |
|
|
|
Yup - pretty accurate. That’s one depressing pile of trash - CanuckDon
But yet they were coming together until injuries derailed the team we all know that |
|
|
|
according to J.D. Burke of The Athletic (subscription required). The scribe begins by pointing out that the Sedin’s decision will have major implications to the salary cap and the look of the team. The cost to retain both soon-to-be 38-year-old forwards will be about $10MM, estimates Burke, who adds the team would have to make a decision whether to keep Vanek with the team.
If the Sedin’s stay, will Benning look for assets that might benefit the veteran Sedins, rather than focus on the team’s need to rebuild. FFS - manvanfan
10 million way to much. |
|
|
|
according to J.D. Burke of The Athletic (subscription required). The scribe begins by pointing out that the Sedin’s decision will have major implications to the salary cap and the look of the team. The cost to retain both soon-to-be 38-year-old forwards will be about $10MM, estimates Burke, who adds the team would have to make a decision whether to keep Vanek with the team.
If the Sedin’s stay, will Benning look for assets that might benefit the veteran Sedins, rather than focus on the team’s need to rebuild. FFS - manvanfan
I wonder who said weeks ago that it would cost 10 mil and that is fooken nuts.
It does zero to help our team going forward. It delays things another year and insulates us to another bottom 5 finish
|
|
|
|
When you try and please aqua man and the Sedin's I don't see how he could do his job properly. - manvanfan
His contracts are not good value. That doesn't fall on Aquaman
|
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
according to J.D. Burke of The Athletic (subscription required). The scribe begins by pointing out that the Sedin’s decision will have major implications to the salary cap and the look of the team. The cost to retain both soon-to-be 38-year-old forwards will be about $10MM, estimates Burke, who adds the team would have to make a decision whether to keep Vanek with the team.
If the Sedin’s stay, will Benning look for assets that might benefit the veteran Sedins, rather than focus on the team’s need to rebuild. FFS - manvanfan
Burke is not an insider in the slightest. He just spews bull sh!t to whoever will listen to his rants |
|
|
|
But yet they were coming together until injuries derailed the team we all know that  - Bettmanhatesus
They were thriving when Bo's line and Sutters line were healthy . You don't need the rest of the garbage |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I wonder who said weeks ago that it would cost 10 mil and that is fooken nuts.
It does zero to help our team going forward. It delays things another year and insulates us to another bottom 5 finish - VANTEL
Someone mentioned 5 mill each and I think that's when I lost it. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I wonder who said weeks ago that it would cost 10 mil and that is fooken nuts.
It does zero to help our team going forward. It delays things another year and insulates us to another bottom 5 finish - VANTEL
They are worth $4 million each not 5. Regardless, I don’t want them back |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
His contracts are not good value. That doesn't fall on Aquaman - VANTEL
Contracts aren't so bad. I wonder what the team would be like if they didn't draft JV and if they didn't have to sign players for the Sedin's every year. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Burke is not an insider in the slightest. He just spews bull sh!t to whoever will listen to his rants - CanuckDon
Ryan Biech > J.D. Burke
That's good hate though. Where's Lefty? |
|
|
|
They are worth $4 million each not 5. Regardless, I don’t want them back - CanuckDon
They are not worth 8 mil to the Canucks , maybe to another team that are competing but not us. We could find another piece to the puzzle with 8 mil .
Rebuilding teams should not bring in expensive untradeable players |
|
|
|
They are worth $4 million each not 5. Regardless, I don’t want them back - CanuckDon
The players want them back, ask any one of them, even connor is amazed watching them and we don't see the inside stuff they do but 5 million each is to much. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
The players want them back, ask any one of them, even connor is amazed watching them and we don't see the inside stuff they do but 5 million each is to much. - Bettmanhatesus
They have great respect around the league. OF course other teams players want them back, they are easy to play against! |
|