He is not high on the depth chart Canucks have 8 Dman now and Holm Wierchioch OJ and McEneny ahead of him but he is still young
- VANTEL

Can never have enough D but at some point. Guys are going to have to be moved. Holm won't play another year in the AHL. Picked up DP just added to the log jam.

Can never have enough D but at some point. Guys are going to have to be moved. Holm won't play another year in the AHL. Picked up DP just added to the log jam.
- manvanfan

Holm will be on the roster next year starting off as a 7/8

Have not seen Rawls back in the game since he opened his stupid yap. NFL is too full of that garbage.

Thank you Carol for everything you do...it truly is appreciated.

Best you of course in the new year and may you have good fortune.

Seahawks just tied it but it may not matter Carolina is tanking the game vs ATL anyways...

Because it is close to TO
- VANTEL

TO is no hockey town. Not enough hockey fans there to support Buffalo.

Jets 1-0 on their 1st shot

TO is no hockey town. Not enough hockey fans there to support Buffalo.
- Nighthawk

The only reason Sabers haven't moved is because of the support for Canadians, over 50% of the attendance at Sabers go.e games come from across border.

i would just as soon sign EG and trade Tanev, especially if the team projects Joe Levi to make it next season , Guds would be a good partner for him to break into the league with imo

i would just as soon sign EG and trade Tanev, especially if the team projects Joe Levi to make it next season , Guds would be a good partner for him to break into the league with imo
- onesmallleap

I need to look into this Joe Levi guy. Thought I knew most of our picks!

I need to look into this Joe Levi guy. Thought I knew most of our picks!
- canucksfan1944

I think he was a free agent signing.

I think he was a free agent signing.
- Reubenkincade

i figured he'd sound tougher , more north americany if i started calling him joe

i figured he'd sound tougher , more north americany if i started calling him joe
- onesmallleap

He is soft call him Joel

i figured he'd sound tougher , more north americany if i started calling him joe
- onesmallleap

I like it. Joe it is.

I think he was a free agent signing.
- Reubenkincade

Along with Loof Lirpa...

Along with Loof Lirpa...
- Nighthawk

We don't sign him until April

Generally if you get a top 5 pick, I think most want a game breaker type of player. Not all drafts have 5 game breakers in them. It doesn't seem as if he is a game breaker, more of just a really good D.

Tanev 2.0.

Noticed during the game that the apple fell the same way for both Matthew and Brady. Chippy kid Brady is.

Matthew isn't as good as most would lead some to believe. 48 points last season. Only on pace for around 40 points again this season. Baertschi is on a better pace.

- manvanfan

The only player I would have wanted ahead of Juolevi is Sergachev. Seemed to me at the time of the draft that you could tell he was going to do the kind of damage we're seeing him do now. If Juolevi is Tanev 2.0 that would be awesome for the Canucks. It also means we still desperately need a top pairing offensive Dman.

I saw a scouting report on Brady Tkachuk that said he has the same grit as his brother but with a better scoring touch.

i would just as soon sign EG and trade Tanev, especially if the team projects Joe Levi to make it next season , Guds would be a good partner for him to break into the league with imo
- onesmallleap

the difference is one is good at hockey and one isnt. trade them both or trade gud but and not time is gud a replacement for tanev.

Pettersson puck moving skills. Nice.

the difference is one is good at hockey and one isnt. trade them both or trade gud but and not time is gud a replacement for tanev.
- mauryballstein

we are a much better team with tanev, It'd be crazy to trade him at this point. He's not expendable he's an essential

Pettersson puck moving skills. Nice.
- VanHockeyGuy

I liked your previous avatar.

I hate that Nike ad. Just hate it.


You're a good poster.

we are a much better team with tanev, It'd be crazy to trade him at this point. He's not expendable he's an essential
- SMBDragon

So keeping Tanev as he barely plays 30-50 games per year now? Respectfully I think it's time to move on...

So keeping Tanev as he barely plays 30-50 games per year now? Respectfully I think it's time to move on...
- LordHumungous

If he gets traded he'll play the next 3 or 4 seasons injury free.

So keeping Tanev as he barely plays 30-50 games per year now? Respectfully I think it's time to move on...
- LordHumungous

once theres an adequate replacement sure. Not until then tho

The only player I would have wanted ahead of Juolevi is Sergachev. Seemed to me at the time of the draft that you could tell he was going to do the kind of damage we're seeing him do now. If Juolevi is Tanev 2.0 that would be awesome for the Canucks. It also means we still desperately need a top pairing offensive Dman.

I saw a scouting report on Brady Tkachuk that said he has the same grit as his brother but with a better scoring touch.
- NorthNuck

I have to admit, i had juolevi higher than sergachev. Russian factor plus the fact he was better offensively than defensively scared me. Juolevi will be a safe pick for us, just takes a bit longer than what most hoped i think