Your sarcasm is not needed or wanted here, try and be a professional like WhiteLie
- LeftCoaster

Try and be a professional I am a professional, a professional mariner.

I’m a bloody volunteer mod for a group of high maintenance posters

BTW, I can see why Turris is sooo coveted, he is a shootout specialist, definitely a wanted commodity for our phenomenal team...

Yes, he doesn't have anyone obvious to target this game.
- Pres.cup

Next game against Flames DD will probably stay in for what he brings.

Vanek was effective net front and shot. Burmi line with Gagner and JV played well. Bo's line had its moments but shut down by Burr. Doubt LE sits.

So kind of hard to see BB play next game either or Jets too. Maybe next week against Sens.

TG was boxed in with the line up today. They had too good of an effective game against Oilers.

Sure, it would have made sense to have more offense with BB. Especially against a Sen's team that was in a defensive shell. But that's not how reality works with dynamics of team and players.

Maybe now TG's more free to tinker or stay the course.
- Nuck4U

And how do you claim the statement “it would have made sense to have more offence with BB”.

As Green stated a few times Boeser just didn’t finish well in preseason to label Boeser as a offensive asset at this point is really premature.

Oh I feel I need to add, this is my opinion and not trying to influence anyone’s thoughts on their opinions.

Whitelie was on to something having Turris on a line with Kane and JV.
- Nuck4U

No he wasn’t, he was being facetious, it was a joke against my stance on those two overrated players, being Canuck players.

IMO

No he wasn’t, he was being facetious, it was a joke against my stance on those two overrated players, being Canuck players.

IMO
- Makita

No he wasn’t, he was being facetious, it was a joke against my stance on those two overrated players, being Canuck players.

IMO
- Makita

Maybe you missed the satire as it was added on to the Turris post by Vantel after that snipe.

But of course someone else, not you, thinks they are smarter in their emoji reaction. How contrite of them.

No he wasn’t, he was being facetious, it was a joke against my stance on those two overrated players, being Canuck players.

IMO
- Makita

Maybe you missed the satire as it was added on to the Turris post by Vantel after that snipe.

But of course someone else, not you, thinks they are smarter in their emoji reaction. How contrite of them.
- Nuck4U

Maybe you missed the satire as it was added on to the Turris post by Vantel after that snipe.

But of course someone else, not you, thinks they are smarter in their emoji reaction. How contrite of them.
- Nuck4U

Poor you.

Maybe you missed the satire as it was added on to the Turris post by Vantel after that snipe.

But of course someone else, not you, thinks they are smarter in their emoji reaction. How contrite of them.
- Nuck4U

So are you referring to Marwood or A_SL both have emoji reactions, and besides they are emojis, really nothing to react to, send your own emoji reaction right back at them. But I don’t think either will really care one way or the other.

Remember ignore and do not respond eventually it will go away....in a year or two

So are you referring to Marwood or A_SL both have emoji reactions, and besides they are emojis, really nothing to react to, send your own emoji reaction right back at them. But I don’t think either will really care one way or the other.

Remember ignore and do not respond eventually it will go away....in a year or two
- Makita

No it wont

I just heard that the USA did not qualify for the World Cup, awesome news

So are you referring to Marwood or A_SL both have emoji reactions, and besides they are emojis, really nothing to react to, send your own emoji reaction right back at them. But I don’t think either will really care one way or the other.

Remember ignore and do not respond eventually it will go away....in a year or two
- Makita

It's very astute of them to act that way isn't it. I don't care just pointing out the level of intelligence. They are stunning examples.

And how do you claim the statement “it would have made sense to have more offence with BB”.

As Green stated a few times Boeser just didn’t finish well in preseason to label Boeser as a offensive asset at this point is really premature.

Oh I feel I need to add, this is my opinion and not trying to influence anyone’s thoughts on their opinions.
- Makita

Take a listen to TG's pre-game presser. He emphasizes that the decision was based on team not player readiness.

http://www.tsn.ca/radio/a...gh-oct-10-hour-2-1.880674

I just heard that the USA did not qualify for the World Cup, awesome news
- Makita

Yeah I read that a couple of hours ago.

Take a listen to TG's pre-game presser. He emphasize that decision was based on team not player.

http://www.tsn.ca/radio/a...gh-oct-10-hour-2-1.880674
- Nuck4U

Yes I had heard the interview, I was referring to the statement that it would have made more sense to go with more offence. I’m not completely sold that Boeser is more offence from his preseason games.

I would like to see quite a few challenging games for Boeser, it would be interesting to see if he disappears as the games get tougher. Personally (and again my opinion) I think Green has the same apprehension with Boeser, but what the fcuk do I know

Yes I had heard the interview, I was referring to the statement that it would have made more sense to go with more offence. I’m not completely sold that Boeser is more offence from his preseason games.

I would like to see quite a few challenging games for Boeser, it would be interesting to see if he disappears as the games get tougher. Personally (and again my opinion) I think Green has the same apprehension with Boeser, but what the fcuk do I know
- Makita

I think that what you know, is that if Boeser is going in, it’s probably not Dorsett who’s coming out.

Players play, coaches coach, managers manage.

I’ve been ignoring for what seems like forever and it doesn’t go away...

And how do you claim the statement “it would have made sense to have more offence with BB”.

As Green stated a few times Boeser just didn’t finish well in preseason to label Boeser as a offensive asset at this point is really premature.

Oh I feel I need to add, this is my opinion and not trying to influence anyone’s thoughts on their opinions.
- Makita

from a few blogs back...I agree social media has a certain sterile, cold, lifelessness to it that differs from the warm a real human reporting can have.

the way you put it was well done!

That burrows video sucked balls. Embarrassing effort Canucks.
- Scooby_Doo

Ya it wasn't very good.

Ya it wasn't very good.
- LordHumungous

Missed it and the game, Cunberland hockey pool draft last night (a bunch of poolies away last week).

Missed it and the game, Cunberland hockey pool draft last night (a bunch of poolies away last week).
- Marwood

I noticed you weren't here annoying everyone last night

roster lines are one thing once the season has started, no problems there. whatever gets your rocks off.

but future roster lines that include unrestricted free agents from multiple other teams on 2018/2019/2020 lineups is just ridiculous.

Bo needs legit wingers .

Bo needs legit wingers .
- VANTEL

Much like Kesler had to endure for many years, no wingers who should actually be top six wingers to play with.

Daniel looked terrible last night, Henrik was fine imo but wow this is still a major work in progress.