Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee Joined: 10.22.2011
Oct 9 @ 5:40 PM ET
Yes you get under my skin but i assure you I’m calm. I just think you are a little rat. I find it hilarious that you call me a Pom Pom waving fan when you think every Canuck prospect is a stud. You wave your Pom poms as much as anyone here - CanuckDon
I've never called any canuck prospect a stud. I say play the prospects so we can get a better draft pick.
See the difference tough guy?
I was once called the Kenny Linseman of HB. So you are not the only one who thinks I'm a rat. I take it as a compliment.
1st off assuming BB in for DD makes no sense.
DD can agitate against any team.
Burmi would be the odd man out imo - Nighthawk
It's not playoffs so DD applicaton on any team not an impact. Sens have no superstar to shadow so role less needed. Burmi more effective against Sens playing a two way game and PP.
True & its all about team building beyond the draft picks.
Anyone can pick high in the draft but who can fill in the roster top down is who ascends in the end. Old school says build from the net out. I agree with that but getting top C's can supercede that philosophy when its presents itself. Our prospect pool is looking better than ever except on D. Work yet to do there. - Nighthawk
D easier to draft out of top 10. So that might fill up if team improves to bubble status.
I've never called any canuck prospect a stud. I say play the prospects so we can get a better draft pick.
See the difference tough guy?
I was once called the Kenny Linseman of HB. So you are not the only one who thinks I'm a rat. I take it as a compliment. - bloatedmosquito
Will ask you again:
If DD has an impact now, beyond Booner's punching bag take, but TG deployment as a pest/agitator, is he needed to play in game against Sens over sitting BB?
If DD has an impact now, beyond Booner's punching bag take, but TG deployment as a pest/agitator, is he needed to play in game against Sens over sitting BB? - Nuck4U
Location: A dose of reality in this cesspool of glee Joined: 10.22.2011
Oct 9 @ 6:02 PM ET
Will ask you again:
If DD has an impact now, beyond Booner's punching bag take, but TG deployment as a pest/agitator, is he needed to play in game against Sens over sitting BB? - Nuck4U
DD has had one good game out of 160+ he's played for the canucks. Let's see him play a second good game before we think of him as a "needed" player.
I would play BB against a team like Ottawa. But as Donna has stated, I'm not a hockey person, so what the (frank) do I know.
DD has had one good game out of 160+ he's played for the canucks. Let's see him play a second good game before we think of him as a "needed" player.
I would play BB against a team like Ottawa. But as Donna has stated, I'm not a hockey person, so what the (frank) do I know. - bloatedmosquito
Agree. Let's see what DD does against Flames and Jets. Perhaps JG and Laine assignments. In that light if he raises his value then he can return futures. Like what Burr did at TDL.
But if BB doesn't draw in against a team Canucks should apply offensive pressure to; then, not sure when the time is right.