More than 1 or 2 per generation.

It's just a weird criteria. I guarantee you're the only one using that definition.
- prock

I guarantee that your guarantee can't be guaranteed.

I would concede to that.....at least you put forth a solid argument to help convince me.
That dingaling that suggested a list that included Pierre (frank)ing Turgeon as generational did not.
- Larsson_fan

I've let you off the hook so many times, it's hilarious, but you CAN'T READ

Not one time in the history of the franking universe did I say Turgeon was a generational talent...I just provided a list, that he was on, that said he had one amazing season. It just so happens that most of the other guys on that list you can make a good argument for being a generational talent.

I feel like reading comprehension just doesn't exist anymore.

Look, if you don't want to read a post, it's OK. Don't read it. But for the love of Pete, if you want to respond to it....franking READ IT.

I've let you off the hook so many times, it's hilarious, but you CAN'T READ

Not one time in the history of the franking universe did I say Turgeon was a generational talent...I just provided a list, that he was on, that said he had one amazing season. It just so happens that most of the other guys on that list you can make a good argument for being a generational talent.

I feel like reading comprehension just doesn't exist anymore.

Look, if you don't want to read a post, it's OK. Don't read it. But for the love of Pete, if you want to respond to it....franking READ IT.


- W_1

No.there are NO arguements for the majority of the names on that list.

trust me guy, edmonton fans know talent. they've been drafting 1st overall for centuries