to me, if benning is looking to move up, then:

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect

is a really good deal for the nucks.
- Tumbleweed

Honka or bust

Did we pass on Glass and/or Vilardi yet?
- Nucker101

Makar ........Glass or Vilardi work fine assuming he is gone

Makar ........Glass or Vilardi work fine assuming he is gone
- CanuckDon

you (frank)ing spineless shill

to me, if benning is looking to move up, then:

Tanev and 5ov
For
3ov, 29ov and an A prospect

is a really good deal for the nucks.
- Tumbleweed

And the way I_See_It is the 3rd and 5th are close to being a wash, so Tanev is worth 29th and a prospect, not naming a prospect but a prospect that could not amount to anything.

And this is why Tanev will stay a Canuck, because it's not worth 2 possibilities for someone that has a proven skill set.

you (frank)ing spineless shill
- Nucker101

should I provide more options? fine, add Petersson, Heiskanen and Mittlestad to the list

And the way I_See_It is the 3rd and 5th are close to being a wash, so Tanev is worth 29th and a prospect, not naming a prospect but a prospect that could not amount to anything.

And this is why Tanev will stay a Canuck, because it's not worth 2 possibilities for someone that has a proven skill set.
- Makita

probably costs 2 2nds to move up from 5 to 3. i think there is a lot of value for the nucks there.

and it's the proper structure for trade so that dallas doesn't get (frank)ed long-term.

should I provide more options? fine, add Petersson, Heiskanen and Mittlestad to the list
- CanuckDon

Honka or bust
- Nucker101

personally, i think 3OA + honka for 5OA + tanev is close.

the other deal is really good.

you are correct, but I still don't like you
- CanuckDon

personally, i think 3OA + honka for 5OA + tanev is close.

the other deal is really good.
- Tumbleweed

Honka is pretty damn good but I'd want at least something decent added to that deal since I don't value the jump from 5 to 3 that highly unless Patrick is there of course

Honka is pretty damn good but I'd want at least something decent added to that deal since I don't value the jump from 5 to 3 that highly unless Patrick is there of course
- Nucker101

Yeah. Why not just stay at 5 and ask for honka, #29 and 2018 2nd.

Yeah. Why not just stay at 5 and ask for honka, #29 and 2018 2nd.
- Tumbleweed

I'd take that easily

same player they could probably get at 5OA 8OA
- manvanfan

oh ... and fixed.

you (frank)ing spineless shill
- Nucker101

Lilgjren (sp) will be the best defensemen out of this draft for at least 3 years......

personally, i think 3OA + honka for 5OA + tanev is close.

the other deal is really good.
- Tumbleweed

3ov....29ov....36ov...honka for 5ov ... tanev.... 33ov.....55ov
Real good deal, I'd do it...

I see leaf fans telling us how we should be posting, that's always a good thing. I'll come back tomorrow.

3ov....29ov....36ov...honka for 5ov ... tanev.... 33ov.....55ov
Real good deal, I'd do it...
- Pres.cup

value wise it's close imo.

seems too complex...8 pieces. so rare to see such a large trade.

I see leaf fans telling us how we should be posting, that's always a good thing. I'll come back tomorrow.
- A_SteamingLombardi

See you then.

And the way I_See_It is the 3rd and 5th are close to being a wash, so Tanev is worth 29th and a prospect, not naming a prospect but a prospect that could not amount to anything.

And this is why Tanev will stay a Canuck, because it's not worth 2 possibilities for someone that has a proven skill set.
- Makita

I already said the 5OA + Tanev for 3OA + 29OA + Prospect was the makings of a solid deal. A deal that is somewhat plausible. Obviously the prospect still needs to be established, but you can see that it's realistic. Tanev for the 3OA + "A" prospect simply is not... And that's fairly clear, wouldn't you agree?

As far as your "validation" comment goes, obviously nobody needs anything from anybody... But am I not allowed to disagree or even cut down COMPLETE bullpoop trades regardless of which blog they appear? Yes. Just like anyone can do the same for me and does from time to time.

Lightnen up, brother. We're all hockey fans here and we don't have to agree or even like each other.

So we want to trade down after tanking to get a high pick

Trade down after a two month debate about BPA

Extend the Sedins and Benning

And oh my lord we will lose Sbisa

Okay as you were

I don't think Dragon grasps sarcasm to well
- VANTEL

not really, just depends if Im tired at the time.

I think it means he can only eat what she allows him to. Until he heads out golfing, has a few beers and chicken wings.
- Makita

basically what I thought. So he's enjoying lots of Kale then

not really, just depends if Im tired at the time.
- SMBDragon

Some things do fly right by you big guy, but I always appreciate the input. You do add some decent debates.

basically what I thought. So he's enjoying lots of Kale then
- SMBDragon

Only if his kale is made of hot dog meat and no leafy stuff

I already said the 5OA + Tanev for 3OA + 29OA + Prospect was the makings of a solid deal. A deal that is somewhat plausible. Obviously the prospect still needs to be established, but you can see that it's realistic. Tanev for the 3OA + "A" prospect simply is not... And that's fairly clear, wouldn't you agree?

As far as your "validation" comment goes, obviously nobody needs anything from anybody... But am I not allowed to disagree or even cut down COMPLETE bullpoop trades regardless of which blog they appear? Yes. Just like anyone can do the same for me and does from time to time.

Lightnen up, brother. We're all hockey fans here and we don't have to agree or even like each other.
- As_I_See_It

You can play the victim card if you like, especially when you post inflammatory posts like this in the Leafs Blog and promptly need to tell Canuck fans that whether or not their valuation is garbage.

"The collective brain damage and delusion in the Nucks' thread surrounding Tanev's value is staggering.

It's as if they think the rest of the league wants to help fast track their rebuild and bail them out of the their problems by doing them favours.

Sad, but not surprising".

Go play your silly bugger games elsewhere, maybe you should head back to your thread to report on the brain damaged ref in the canucks thread