|
|
Both Grenier and Pedan one year two way deals. No mention of AAV |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
More cowbell for Zogg. |
|
|
|
That's ok. We are trading Edler Hutton and the drop pass designer for Landeskog and Barrie.  - VANTEL
I'm in. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
No doubt, hopefully they also got better. - belcherbd
MEAT AND POTATOES |
|
|
|
He is going to arbitration so you can't. Also if Wash doesn't like what arb awards him, he goes to UFA and they get nothing for him. Perfect time to buy cheap the closer it gets to arbitration day. - Retinalz
Johansson's arbitration case is tomorrow, Kreider & Grigorenko are Friday. |
|
WhatTheNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 06.17.2014
|
|
|
Both Grenier and Pedan one year two way deals. No mention of AAV - VANTEL
That's good to have dealt with. The team is set unless a trade occurs and I'm pretty happy if we started the year as is. |
|
Retinalz
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 01.31.2015
|
|
|
Johansson's arbitration case is tomorrow, Kreider & Grigorenko are Friday. - A_SteamingLombardi
I would love to get one of MoJo or Kreider. Provided it doesn't cost one of our top prospects. I would do a mid level one like Subban with Sbisa or something like that. |
|
|
|
I would love to get one of MoJo or Kreider. Provided it doesn't cost one of our top prospects. I would do a mid level one like Subban with Sbisa or something like that. - Retinalz
I have a feeling Kreider will be signed before Friday. |
|
|
|
I would love to get one of MoJo or Kreider. Provided it doesn't cost one of our top prospects. I would do a mid level one like Subban with Sbisa or something like that. - Retinalz
Could be a trade for Grenier or Pedan now too |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Could be a trade for Grenier or Pedan now too  - VANTEL
speaking of lineups, it has been anything but static since JB arrived. makes some moves, see the impact/ lack of and goes from there. JB has more work to do. |
|
|
|
speaking of lineups, it has been anything but static since JB arrived. makes some moves, see the impact/lack of and goes from there. JB has more work to do. - hillbillydeluxe
I doubt Benning is going to lose another RFA to waivers ala Corrado. I think they could be moved soon unless they are keeping Pedan as a 7 th. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Both Grenier and Pedan one year two way deals. No mention of AAV - VANTEL
Good to have those guys as depth, Utica roster is starting to come together but unfortunately we don't have many potential NHLers in the mix.
Gaunce- Megna – Grenier
Hulak- Chaput – Rendulic
Zalewski - Bancks - Hamilton
Archibald – Cassels – Laplante
Labate
Pedan - Stecher
Billins - Subban
Sautner – Nilsson
McEneny, Cederholm ?
Bachman
Demko |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
I doubt Benning is going to lose another RFA to waivers ala Corrado. I think they could be moved soon unless they are keeping Pedan as a 7 th. - VANTEL
I could see them protecting Biega over Pedan. |
|
|
|
Good to have those guys as depth, Utica roster is starting to come together but unfortunately we don't have many potential NHLers in the mix.
Gaunce- Megna – Grenier
Hulak- Chaput – Rendulic
Zalewski - Bancks - Hamilton
Archibald – Cassels – Laplante
Labate
Pedan - Biega
Billins - Subban
Sautner – Stecher
McEneny, Nilsson
Bachman
Demko - belcherbd
Pedan Biega Grenier all would need to clear waivers . We know the Leafs would claim all three and have Pedan and Biega as their second pair D and Grenier as their top 6 .
The sad thing is they could all fit in unseemingly |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
I could see them protecting Biega over Pedan. - belcherbd
I don't see it. Pedan is still improving and is relatively young. Biega will never be more than a 7th defensemen. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
I don't see it. Pedan is still improving and is relatively young. Biega will never be more than a 7th defensemen. - CanuckDon
If they want to remain competitive they are going to want the guy who can at least hold his head above water in the NHL.
WD wouldn't even play Pedan at D when we were really shorthanded. |
|
Makita
Referee Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
That was a beautiful hit. Our team has gotten VERY heavy. - Retinalz
And the reason why some want Pirri when he's easily knocked over by an out of shape breathing heavy russian... |
|
|
|
Can we trade Pedan and RHD Biega for McDavid?
Stupid Hamhuis . We could have had Hall if he would have waived that NTC |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
If they want to remain competitive they are going to want the guy who can at least hold his head above water in the NHL.
WD wouldn't even play Pedan at D when we were really shorthanded. - belcherbd
So you think we should expose Pedan to waivers based on the small sample size last year? Pedan would be claimed, Biega probably not. Willie tried Pedan at wing for a couple games...it was stupid
edit...this pains me to say this Belcher....but this is basic asset management |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
So you think we should expose Pedan to waivers based on the small sample size last year? Pedan would be claimed, Biega probably not. Willie tried Pedan at wing for a couple games...it was stupid - CanuckDon
No I wouldn't expose Pedan over Biega.
I also think Pedan is more likely to be claimed out of the two of them but I think the impact of losing Biega would be more detrimental to this team's goal.
Edit.for your edit. Then you would understand why this team would waive Pedan |
|
|
|
No I wouldn't expose Pedan over Biega.
I also think Pedan is more likely to be claimed out of the two of them but I think the impact of losing Biega would be more detrimental to this team's goal.
Edit.for your edit. Then you would understand why this team would waive Pedan  - belcherbd
I think if someone picked up Biega Canucks would be happy that he is rewarded. I don't think they would be happy to lose Pedan for nothing. |
|
|
|
So you think we should expose Pedan to waivers based on the small sample size last year? Pedan would be claimed, Biega probably not. Willie tried Pedan at wing for a couple games...it was stupid
edit...this pains me to say this Belcher....but this is basic asset management  - CanuckDon
Oh yeah you can't expose Pedan. Biega's contract was a reward for his work as the captain in Utica, his contract is designed to keep him from being claimed. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
I think if someone picked up Biega Canucks would be happy that he is rewarded. I don't think they would be happy to lose Pedan for nothing. - VANTEL
I hear what you are saying but I think there are a lot of question marks with our Defense still and they will want some of that stability that Biega brings.
I also don't think they are as high on Pedan as they were earlier in his career. I can't see them being that upset losing him either. |
|
|
|
I hear what you are saying but I think there are a lot of question marks with our Defense still and they will want some of that stability that Biega brings.
I also don't think they are as high on Pedan as they were earlier in his career. I can't see them being that upset losing him either. - belcherbd
If they aren't as high on Pedan then they should trade him. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Oh yeah you can't expose Pedan. Biega's contract was a reward for his work as the captain in Utica, his contract is designed to keep him from being claimed. - A_SteamingLombardi
I don't understand that?
If a team claims him they wouldn't be able to send the player down and save that additional money without Van or some other team getting to claim him.
|
|