This.
I don't understand how it was called anything but a goal.
- Scoob

Guys, don't let logic and facts get in the way of personal bias.

Season is over. So...

This.
I don't understand how it was called anything but a goal.
- Scoob

Because it's the bruins. This kind of stuff has been happening to us all season.

Here's the Sharp goal from last month
http://nesn.com/2016/02/p...fter-net-dislodges-video/
"Among them was Patrick Sharp’s goal, which never legally crossed the goal line, but was deemed to be a good goal after Adam McQuaid crashed into the net, which dislodged. After an official review, referees determined that the puck would have crossed the goal line legally had the net not been moved, giving Dallas a 3-1 lead over Boston at the time"

Notice is says "referees determined that the puck WOULD HAVE crossed the goal line....." - How is that any different from the two disallowed Bruins goals over the passed two night?

Although you couldn't see the full puck across the goal line against the Rangers, you could assume that it would have crossed the goal line, as it was clearly seen across in Henriks's glove.

Last nights call is just a disgrace how it's inconclusive when you can clearly see the puck behind the post in the net.

Yet a Sharp's shot that didn't even cross the goal line is called against us.



Bruins aren't playing well, but they're up against the league as well. I still believe we can make the playoffs and can't beat any of the teams in our division. Don't count these boys out yet. Us against the world.

Bunch of crybaby bytches. Even if it was a goal you still would've lost. How about all the non-calls that go unnoticed or ignored by the refs? Like when Luongo was speared by a Boston player last night? Or every other call once a night on every game they play. It all even out in the end and the Panthers were the better, rested team in the 3rd so LIS they would've lost anyway.
- BravePackCats27

Even Luongo said it was in the net after the fact, and had that goal counted there's nothing to say the Bruins wouldn't have played harder with the game tied up and won it considering it was a completely different game up to that point.

Even Luongo said it was in the net after the fact, and had that goal counted there's nothing to say the Bruins wouldn't have played harder with the game tied up and won it considering it was a completely different game up to that point.
- Rayven

Crybaby bytch.

Even Luongo said it was in the net after the fact, and had that goal counted there's nothing to say the Bruins wouldn't have played harder with the game tied up and won it considering it was a completely different game up to that point.
- Rayven

So you're saying down a goal wouldn't make them play harder? Great logic. If anything they would play harder down a goal pal. They were tired and it showed more and more as the game went on. The goal/no goal made no difference.

As a Panther fan, that was a goal. I wasn't surprised by the bad call. I was surprised a bad call went in Florida's favor. I've been accustomed to those calls going against Florida so often, I'm baffled one went in our favor. Boston fans, give us this moment. I promise it won't happen again any time soon.

So you're saying down a goal wouldn't make them play harder? Great logic. If anything they would play harder down a goal pal. They were tired and it showed more and more as the game went on. The goal/no goal made no difference.
- BravePackCats27

That goal would've made it 2-2. You guys scored to make it 3-1 less than a minute later on a PP for too many men, then scored an empty net goal. It was a good goal that got disallowed and changed the outcome of the game. Take the lucky break you got and run, don't defend your team on winning by error

So you're saying down a goal wouldn't make them play harder? Great logic. If anything they would play harder down a goal pal. They were tired and it showed more and more as the game went on. The goal/no goal made no difference.
- BravePackCats27

well, im not going to read anything dumber this week

well, im not going to read anything dumber this week
- Lee Denault

http://www.huffingtonpost..._56f41314e4b04c4c376186ad

well, im not going to read anything dumber this week
- Lee Denault

That's only because you can't. Oh yeah the leafs blow.

Crybaby bytch.
- glove_was_stuck

stfu