SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
We needed a C so prolly the better pick.
We followed it up with a power winger anyways. - Nighthawk
Yes you are correct we did need a C. Perhaps gillis drafted by position?
Nichushkins skill set was just so tempting. I'd have picked him based on that. I do wonder what Bo's potential ceiling potential is though. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
@Vantel
Bro whats up? Your kinda in my court on my musings lately π
I know i throw out random thoughts but i do change my stances time to time.
Nothing more than banter though. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Yes you are correct we did need a C. Perhaps gillis drafted by position?
Nichushkins skill set was just so tempting. I'd have picked him based on that. I do wonder what Bo's potential ceiling potential is though. - SMBDragon
IMO a C is always picked over a winger if equal probability of success.
C can convert easy enough n all teams search for gems at C.
Thats nothing new ala the Wings model
Edit:
A C with a 200' game is very important other than a winger that is a true NHL sniper. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
You are wrong. Demko will play one year in AHL at the most . We will have no one on the farm other than Bachman - VANTEL
I meant maximum of 2 though.
There is Canatta too
Theres college route, KHL, trade, UFA etc. Doesnt have to be drafted per se. BUt if the right goalie is in the draft then of course. |
|
|
|
@Vantel
Bro whats up? Your kinda in my court on my musings lately π
I know i throw out random thoughts but i do change my stances time to time.
Nothing more than banter though. - Nighthawk
I am loving , nurturing and caring
Like I said it is a good bunch of guys on here. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I meant maximum of 2 though.
There is Canatta too
Theres college route, KHL, trade, UFA etc. Doesnt have to be drafted per se. BUt if the right goalie is in the draft then of course. - SMBDragon
There is a UFA goalie at Yale that many teams will try to sign for free.
As for a trade idk about that. Rather draft one if not a UFA. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
IMO a C is always picked over a winger if equal probability of success.
C can convert easy enough n all teams search for gems at C.
Thats nothing new ala the Wings model
Edit:
A C with a 200' game is very important other than a winger that is a true NHL sniper. - Nighthawk
I wonder in that draft who JB would have selected between them....OR maybe someone else even |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I am loving , nurturing and caring
Like I said it is a good bunch of guys on here. - VANTEL
Definitelyππ
We all won't agree with each other on everything but thats what we do here.
We play Armchair GM yes but at heart we r fans 1st. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
I wonder in that draft who JB would have selected between them....OR maybe someone else even - SMBDragon
All i can add is check who the Bruins then to maybe get an idea.
Edit:
Nvm the B's had no 1st rounder that draft. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
There is a UFA goalie at Yale that many teams will try to sign for free.
As for a trade idk about that. Rather draft one if not a UFA. - Nighthawk
Ya Im with you on that. Im more of not a direct trade for a goalie but as part of package....can be your prospect part.
Markstrom was a prospect part of a deal and thats worked out awesome. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
All i can add is check who the Bruins then to maybe get an idea. - Nighthawk
but they didnt have #9....I meant if JB was here that year and with that same pick.... |
|
|
|
I meant maximum of 2 though.
There is Canatta too
Theres college route, KHL, trade, UFA etc. Doesnt have to be drafted per se. BUt if the right goalie is in the draft then of course. - SMBDragon
Of course there are other routes to find a goalie.
The most successful way though is through the draft.
If you look at the second round choices there is nothing really of high quality unless you consider Tyler Benson a good player.
I think it is the perfect time to pick for need and not pick BPA . There are some undersized players but we have a few of them already. I would target the best goalie available
|
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
but they didnt have #9....I meant if JB was here that year and with that same pick.... - SMBDragon
2013 draft Bo #9 Shink #24
In hindsight we take Theodore #26 n we don't have Granlund now.
Woulda coulda shoulda i know ππππ» |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
All in all our future lies in our kids n draft picks.
Now if JB keeps on proving his drafting talent we r fine.
So far so good n if he keeps dealing to help out weaknesses
or upgrading then even better yet. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Pens 5-3 over NYR without Malkin. Huge win for them.
East sure is a strange conference n weaker than the west obviously. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Of course there are other routes to find a goalie.
The most successful way though is through the draft.
If you look at the second round choices there is nothing really of high quality unless you consider Tyler Benson a good player.
I think it is the perfect time to pick for need and not pick BPA . There are some undersized players but we have a few of them already. I would target the best goalie available - VANTEL
Second round is too high for a goalie. That would be twice in 3 years we select a goalie with our second pick. I'd be ok with a goalie in the 4th or 5th round but I feel we should use our 2nd on a D |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Second round is too high for a goalie. That would be twice in 3 years we select a goalie with our second pick. I'd be ok with a goalie in the 4th or 5th round but I feel we should use our 2nd on a D - CanuckDon
Agree but prolly BPA is most likely.
Idk if I want any small forwards though but a good smaller D is ok.
Must be gifted on offense .
Hart will be around maybe but i figure a team like the Leafs or Oil take him.
Edit: Flames could pick Hart also |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Of course there are other routes to find a goalie.
The most successful way though is through the draft.
If you look at the second round choices there is nothing really of high quality unless you consider Tyler Benson a good player.
I think it is the perfect time to pick for need and not pick BPA . There are some undersized players but we have a few of them already. I would target the best goalie available - VANTEL
theres FA college guys too that are reported to be very good. |
|
|
|