I find them extremely irritating!
- CanuckDon

doubt you've watched either play a game

doubt you've watched either play a game
- Crazybagoham

You are referring to who Hammy? Matthews and ____? Or do you mean I've never watched a blue chip prospect play? I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for your response

You are referring to who Hammy? Matthews and ____? Or do you mean I've never watched a blue chip prospect play? I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for your response
- CanuckDon

Laine, your #1 pick apparently. Sometimes i think my dog has more hockey knowledge than you, slightly more bearable as well

(edit) needed more smack talk

Laine, your #1 pick apparently.
- Crazybagoham

I'd probably take Matthews first but it would be tough. I've seen all of their games in the world juniors and highlights that's it

Matthews would be our number one center. He is better than any of our prospects

I'd probably take Matthews first but it would be tough. I've seen all of their games in the world juniors and highlights that's it
- CanuckDon

yeah, not enough to claim that either are a franchise player, let alone laine.

Laine, your #1 pick apparently. Sometimes i think my dog has more hockey knowledge than you, slightly more bearable as well

(edit) needed more smack talk
- Crazybagoham

You are right at the top of my top 10 list of stupidest posters Hammy...it's a privilege to converse with you. Bye for now

You are right at the top of my top 10 list of stupidest posters Hammy...it's a privilege to converse with you. Bye for now
- CanuckDon

as usual, no actual arguement, showing how much real hockey knowledge you have (or lack thereof). Better luck next time

Just you wait!!
- Marwood

Oh come on now, it's not like people around here piss and moan about nothing.

Or we could say all the best with retirement
- VANTEL

They're still top scorers in the league, and you want them to just go away?

The twins can provide secondary scoring for awhile yet.

They're still top scorers in the league, and you want them to just go away?

The twins can provide secondary scoring for awhile yet.
- golfingsince

I'm okay with the Sedins being our 2nd/3rd line down the road if we have a legitimate top line (most fans would agree), that would be a potent offense. Especially if they both took match 3m AAV deals.

Calgary takes Chychrun? They don't need D they need 2nd 3rd and 4th line scoring…badly.
- LordHumungous

Take BPA ...id lean towards a forward but it's not as bad 2nd-4th line as you think

I like Laine better but do you want to be the GM that turned down Mathews? I wouldn't
- VANTEL

Mathews is the easy choice ...especially for Van

Top 3 would be great.
- thundachunk

Would love one of those two big Finns bro. It would go a long way

They're still top scorers in the league, and you want them to just go away?

The twins can provide secondary scoring for awhile yet.
- golfingsince

They will be great help to the kids for years to come ....until you have a top line they don't need to go anywhere

Would love one of those two big Finns bro. It would go a long way
- VANTEL

I wouldn't be too upset if the lotto went :

Van
Cgy
Anyone not edm or Toronto

They're still top scorers in the league, and you want them to just go away?

The twins can provide secondary scoring for awhile yet.
- golfingsince

Lets talk in three years see how they are doing. It is a long time away. if they are still producing then they deserve to stay.

Take BPA ...id lean towards a forward but it's not as bad 2nd-4th line as you think
- Redmile247

Fair enough and I guess I forgot you don't have Russell anymore and they will most likely try to get Wideman off the books. having said that you still have Gio Brodie and Hamilton which most teams would just kill for. I just think with some shrewd drafting the Flames can shore up secondary scoring maybe even get a top 6 stud.

I wouldn't be too upset if the lotto went :

Van
Cgy
Anyone not edm or Toronto
- Redmile247

The funny thing is I want Laine over Mathews but I wont find to many to back me on that

Fair enough and I guess I forgot you don't have Russell anymore and they will most likely try to get Wideman off the books. having said that you still have Gio Brodie and Hamilton which most teams would just kill for. I just think with some shrewd drafting the Flames can shore up secondary scoring maybe even get a top 6 stud.
- LordHumungous

If the flames land a Fin(or heaven forbid matthews), they are going to be a female dog to play against in 3 years.

The funny thing is I want Laine over Mathews but I wont find to many to back me on that
- VANTEL

Do we need Matthews if we are signing Stamkos??



Outside of the top 5 I really think we need to draft D D and more Dmen.

I don't mind this Sergechev kid you mentioned...

Fair enough and I guess I forgot you don't have Russell anymore and they will most likely try to get Wideman off the books. having said that you still have Gio Brodie and Hamilton which most teams would just kill for. I just think with some shrewd drafting the Flames can shore up secondary scoring maybe even get a top 6 stud.
- LordHumungous

For right now a top 6 stud would be ideal ...but we really don't know after the top 3 D who is going to stick ...it's just as likely one of the wingers in Stockton might develop as the D

If the flames land a Fin(or heaven forbid matthews), they are going to be a female dog to play against in 3 years.
- Crazybagoham

That could be very true.

The funny thing is I want Laine over Mathews but I wont find to many to back me on that
- VANTEL

Why do you want laine over Mathews ??

The funny thing is I want Laine over Mathews but I wont find to many to back me on that
- VANTEL

tbh I dont even want in the top 3 being in the 3-7 will force JB to pick a d man :3

Lets talk in three years see how they are doing. It is a long time away. if they are still producing then they deserve to stay.
- VANTEL

Well their deals end in 2 years so hopefully we'll have it figured out by then.