Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Game Review: Royally Dominated by Los Angeles Kings
Author Message
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 3:25 PM ET
Who knows what players JB will be targeting in the draft. we hear all about wanting those lottery picks and then hear years later how this or that player was passed over by all these teams and picked later in the draft.

trading down a few spots doesn't sound too far fetched to me, if it does happen, I'd guess it would be a move that happens just before the Canucks turn to pick.

I kept on seeing us in the 8th spot with one of those draft simulators and can't guess who JB likes.

- hillbillydeluxe


Same here n i ponder daily who we pick. Figure 5-7 likely.
I just cannot get wound up much about the draft past the 1st.
Scooby_Doo
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Somewhere close to Vancouver., BC
Joined: 06.10.2009

Mar 8 @ 3:27 PM ET
Highly intelligent. U have some more?
- Nighthawk


In a rebuild you want to trade a potential top 3 or 5 pick who could be a franchise player to get some defenseman ranked anywhere from 15-22nd because he shoots right handed?

Dumbest post of the season. Congrats.
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 3:30 PM ET
If its an RHD we want its Fabbro.
Trade down?


Trade down to 20th?
- Scooby_Doo


Hard to out do dumb but ur tops.
MaWLz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Langley , BC
Joined: 01.05.2009

Mar 8 @ 3:31 PM ET
First round you take BPA.. Especially if we're top 5.. If it happens to be a D man the you take him but you don't draft by position that high up
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:31 PM ET
Hard to out do dumb but ur tops.
- Nighthawk


WTF are you trying to say?
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Mar 8 @ 3:32 PM ET
If its an RHD we want its Fabbro.
Trade down?

- Nighthawk

A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Mar 8 @ 3:33 PM ET
First round you take BPA.. Especially if we're top 5.. If it happens to be a D man the you take him but you don't draft by position that high up
- MaWLz

CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:40 PM ET
First round you take BPA.. Especially if we're top 5.. If it happens to be a D man the you take him but you don't draft by position that high up
- MaWLz


I've been saying this for as long as my ban has been lifted...BPA with your first pick. You can't pass on a first line forward to draft a D prospect simply because it's an organizational need. Then, unless there is a serious dark horse Benning wants, pick all D.

Benning essentially validated my opinion several weeks ago
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 3:41 PM ET
Outside of the top 3 this draft u pick needs. Tkachuk is fine for the right team.
We r not that team IMO. Overloaded on LHD if none moved. We want speed n skill up front n highly mobile puck moving D.
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:42 PM ET
First round you take BPA.. Especially if we're top 5.. If it happens to be a D man the you take him but you don't draft by position that high up
- MaWLz


I've been saying this for as long as my ban has been lifted...BPA with your first pick. You can't pass on a first line forward to draft a D prospect simply because it's an organizational need. Then, unless there is a serious dark horse Benning wants, pick all D.

Benning essentially validated my opinion several weeks ago
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:44 PM ET
I've been saying this for as long as my ban has been lifted...BPA with your first pick. You can't pass on a first line forward to draft a D prospect simply because it's an organizational need. Then, unless there is a serious dark horse Benning wants, pick all D.

Benning essentially validated my opinion several weeks ago

- CanuckDon


I stated in the other post. If we ended up with a top 3 pick, I would go BPA between Matthews, Laine, Pulj. If we land 4-10, I would choose the Best D-man available between Chychrun and Juolevi (sp?). I know there are some really good gritty forwards to choose from but I think drafting a D-man in the first round (outside the top 3) would be pretty useful. I think Benning needs to also draft D throughout the next draft. Apart of Olson/Brisbois/Neil, he hasn't really drafted many D-men in his 2 years here has he?
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:47 PM ET
WTF are you trying to say?
- 1970vintage

Ronning4ever
Joined: 09.11.2008

Mar 8 @ 3:48 PM ET
Daniel Sedin is a disaster.
- Marwood


I know. He's got the worst +/- in the league, is in the bottom 97% in terms of Corsi and Fenwick and is one of the worst league-wide in terms of giving up a goal when his team is leading by 1.
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:48 PM ET
I stated in the other post. If we ended up with a top 3 pick, I would go BPA between Matthews, Laine, Pulj. If we land 4-10, I would choose the Best D-man available between Chychrun and Juolevi (sp?). I know there are some really good gritty forwards to choose from but I think drafting a D-man in the first round (outside the top 3) would be pretty useful. I think Benning needs to also draft D throughout the next draft. Apart of Olson/Brisbois/Neil, he hasn't really drafted many D-men in his 2 years here has he?
- Codes1087


He drafted Tree, Forslingand traded for Pedan
Makita
Referee
Vancouver Canucks
Location: #theonlyrealfan, BC
Joined: 02.16.2007

Mar 8 @ 3:48 PM ET
Most times just pressing submit "ONCE" is all that's needed
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Canuckville, BC
Joined: 01.09.2015

Mar 8 @ 3:48 PM ET
I stated in the other post. If we ended up with a top 3 pick, I would go BPA between Matthews, Laine, Pulj. If we land 4-10, I would choose the Best D-man available between Chychrun and Juolevi (sp?). I know there are some really good gritty forwards to choose from but I think drafting a D-man in the first round (outside the top 3) would be pretty useful. I think Benning needs to also draft D throughout the next draft. Apart of Olson/Brisbois/Neil, he hasn't really drafted many D-men in his 2 years here has he?
- Codes1087


I agree. After the top 3 saying BPA is stupid. Was Boesser BPA?
As for picking D its a tough call n JB will sort it out. Trades could
could happen yet n a more clear picture ahead.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Mar 8 @ 3:50 PM ET
.Utan efst 3 Þessi drög u velja þörfum. Tkachuk er fínn fyrir rétta liðið.
Við r ekki að liðið er. Mikið á LHD ef enginn flutt. Við viljum hraði n færni upp fyrir framan n mjög hreyfanlegur plata flytja D.

- Nighthawk

Totally!
Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:52 PM ET
He drafted Tree, Forslingand traded for Pedan
- CanuckDon


Absolutely right about Tree and Forsling.

Lets try not to bring up Forsling please

I have faith in Benning's ability to analyze talent. He has proven me wrong in any trade/acquisition that I have doubted.
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Mar 8 @ 3:52 PM ET
I stated in the other post. If we ended up with a top 3 pick, I would go BPA between Matthews, Laine, Pulj. If we land 4-10, I would choose the Best D-man available between Chychrun and Juolevi (sp?). I know there are some really good gritty forwards to choose from but I think drafting a D-man in the first round (outside the top 3) would be pretty useful. I think Benning needs to also draft D throughout the next draft. Apart of Olson/Brisbois/Neil, he hasn't really drafted many D-men in his 2 years here has he?
- Codes1087


3 per draft.

Tryaminkin, Forsling, Stewart
Brisbois, Neil, Olson

Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:53 PM ET
Really good read here from CanucksArmy on the top 5 NCAA free agents and who we should go after, including Boeser's linemate at UND, and Chris Tanev's brother.

http://canucksarmy.com/20...at-the-canucks-may-target
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Mar 8 @ 3:54 PM ET
I agree. After the top 3 saying BPA is stupid. Was Boesser BPA?
As for picking D its a tough call n JB will sort it out. Trades could
could happen yet n a more clear picture ahead.

- Nighthawk


BPA is a good strategy, but teams have different lists of who they want to draft after perhaps the top 3...
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:54 PM ET
Totally!
- Marwood


Well played son
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:56 PM ET
Absolutely right about Tree and Forsling.

Lets try not to bring up Forsling please

I have faith in Benning's ability to analyze talent. He has proven me wrong in any trade/acquisition that I have doubted.

- Codes1087


That was probably his worst trade...but it definitely made sense. I would be surprised if Forsling ever makes the NHL though so it likely won't cost us
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Mar 8 @ 3:58 PM ET
That was probably his worst trade...but it definitely made sense. I would be surprised if Forsling ever makes the NHL though so it likely won't cost us
- CanuckDon


It is funny that after we had Clendening, other clubs wanted/traded for him.

Codes1087
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 09.24.2014

Mar 8 @ 3:59 PM ET
That was probably his worst trade...but it definitely made sense. I would be surprised if Forsling ever makes the NHL though so it likely won't cost us
- CanuckDon


we can't even say we lost that trade. We can look back in 5 years, maybe, to see if there is a winner.

Benning was super handcuffed for a D-man at the time, and it didn't seem like a bad trade.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next