|
|
You sure? I thought Subban and Suter were both making around 8 or 9 too. What's Doughty making? - neem55
Average is 7 + |
|
Scooby_Doo
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Somewhere close to Vancouver., BC Joined: 06.10.2009
|
|
|
I don't want fleas - A_SteamingLombardi
Obviously you're not a dog owner. No dogs have fleas in February. |
|
|
|
I know JB said he wants D at the draft but I sure wouldn't mind big Logan Brown |
|
neem55
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 02.02.2012
|
|
|
AAV vs yearly breakdown might be causing some discrepancy. - dbot
That's fair. I still think top two guys on d pairs usually are making between 6-9... but maybe it's more like 5-8. Either way, Edler's contract is not bad. The salaries of these types of players is definetly going up all the time. As 7 mil is becoming more and more common for d men. |
|
|
|
What's the last number one defenceman that made it to free agency? Never happens anymore. There is a league wide shortage on differance making defenceman. We will not get one in free agency. It's draft or trade. And if we trade it's a massive overpayment. No thanks...I'd rather draft my own. - Bullfrog77
If you asked the Leaf fans they would answer Corrado |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
I know JB said he wants D at the draft but I sure wouldn't mind big Logan Brown - VANTEL
I wouldnt mind Julien Gauthier, apparently been a gym rat since 10 years old, nobody would push him around. |
|
|
|
I wouldnt mind Julien Gauthier, apparently been a gym rat since 10 years old, nobody would push him around. - phyllee
Probably a top 10 pick. I was hoping we picked up another pick around 20 |
|
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: vancouver, BC Joined: 06.12.2015
|
|
|
I hope not...this draft is loaded with potential first line forwards. I'd be happy with Matthews, The Finns, Tkachuck, McLeod or even Nylander. He is quite a bit bigger than his smurf brother. We can grab a D with our second 1st rounder (Hamhuis trade) and our high 2nd round pick - CanuckDon
Id have zero problem with dubios at 7 too |
|
phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
Probably a top 10 pick. I was hoping we picked up another pick around 20 - VANTEL
Fabbro is now rated between 12-20, hes the defenseman i really want in the draft, if we had another pick pick between there id have no problem taking a forward with the top ten pick |
|
|
|
Bob essentially says Juolevi/Chychrun are the best two but nothing is set. I Still think Chychrun still has the overall skillset that is much better, but maybe he doesn't have the mental side for the big stage, time will tell. - neem55
Either one would be fine |
|
|
|
Fabbro is now rated between 12-20, hes the defenseman i really want in the draft, if we had another pick pick between there id have no problem taking a forward with the top ten pick - phyllee
I watch him play all the time, he's not that great. But then i'm not a scout. |
|
|
|
I watch him play all the time, he's not that great. But then i'm not a scout. - VanHockeyGuy
Is he an upgrade on Hutton? |
|
|
|
I watch him play all the time, he's not that great. But then i'm not a scout. - VanHockeyGuy
Hey hey, you're a hell of a scout
|
|
|
|
Is he an upgrade on Edler? - VANTEL
Fixed |
|
|
|
Is he an upgrade on Hutton? - VANTEL
No, not yet at least. Jost is the guy to watch, a bit small but man does he stand out. |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Or maybe the shock wave will be something similar to what was felt when Bieksa left?
I look at Edler's +/- over the years and I'm not so sure his contributions would be a crushing loss to the defensive scheme.
07-08 6
08-09 11
09-10 0
10-11 13
11-12 0
12-13 -5
13-14 -39
14-15 13
15-16 -8
My Kingdom for a #1 with consistency! - bloatedmosquito
'I would think edler would be better in 2nd pairing honestly. If we didnt have edler whoever moved up would likely be worse for plus minus.
Again as Ive said before, while the lineup could certianly improve, the problem really isnt the lineup. Every D we have would improve with a better D plan. Notice all of them suck? |
|
|
|
'I would think edler would be better in 2nd pairing honestly. If we didnt have edler whoever moved up would likely be worse for plus minus.
Again as Ive said before, while the lineup could certianly improve, the problem really isnt the lineup. Every D we have would improve with a better D plan. Notice all of them suck? - SMBDragon
Why not just go in a different direction |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Why not just go in a different direction - VANTEL
thats vague....how can you agree to go a different way when you have no idea what that plan is? If its better then sure. Edler leaves shoes to fill.
What do you have in mind? |
|
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: vancouver, BC Joined: 06.12.2015
|
|
|
No, not yet at least. Jost is the guy to watch, a bit small but man does he stand out.  - VanHockeyGuy
Ive watched him too. He almost reminds me of steve yzerman. |
|
|
|
Ive watched him too. He almost reminds me of steve yzerman. - mauryballstein
He's exciting for sure. I will still go D though unless we get another #1. |
|
|
|
thats vague....how can you agree to go a different way when you have no idea what that plan is? If its better then sure. Edler leaves shoes to fill.
What do you have in mind? - SMBDragon
I'm sure Benning doesn't either lately |
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
Why not just go in a different direction - VANTEL
I suggested a different direction last season....a different coach that knows what the F&CK theyre doing on D.
But some wont be onboard since it shuts down their daily online trade idea fun |
|
|
|
thats vague....how can you agree to go a different way when you have no idea what that plan is? If its better then sure. Edler leaves shoes to fill.
What do you have in mind? - SMBDragon
As a poster said earlie if you trade Edler for a first round pick and a prospect plus Edlers replacement even if it is just Hamhuis, is better than Edler |
|
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: vancouver, BC Joined: 06.12.2015
|
|
|
He's exciting for sure. I will still go D though unless we get another #1. - VanHockeyGuy
I think he will be very good player, small though but I see him as that playoff leader/captain type. but there is probably 8-10 forwards id take before him. |
|
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: vancouver, BC Joined: 06.12.2015
|
|
|
As a poster said earlie if you trade Edler for a first round pick and a prospect plus Edlers replacement even if it is just Hamhuis, is better than Edler - VANTEL
Couldnt agree more now is the time to sell high on him that prospect would hopefully be a defensemen and in 2-3 years step in to the role edler currently plays. |
|