I have heard Leon D....but admittedly I know nothing about him. Havent seen him play either. So I couldnt say. Perhaps fill me in?

But ya there's too much hate to trade with either of those....usually the trades that are fair are not in your conference. CBJ and buff are possibilities.

philly might be the right team too. Schenn maybe. Or some other D


on an unrelated note...I wonder if tampa will move stamkos at TD since he wont sign there.
- SMBDragon

Although lots will disagree, trading for both schenns would be awesome, there tough and can play.
B.Schenn-Sutter-Burrows
Sbisa-L.Schenn

If anyone gos from that team its RNH, EBS, or Yak.

If the return is good enough PERHAPS Hall. But I cant see that happening.
- vancity787

' nothing from oilers interests me unless its nurse.

only want D men at this point.

Im wondering if JB has had recent contact with tryamkin about his plans

So these guys have a big dinner and drinks on the rookies tab and then the 1st game after they leave the rookies to fend for themselves, nice (frank)ing teammates.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Not sure why we were considered one of the most despised teams for so long.

Although lots will disagree, trading for both schenns would be awesome, there tough and can play.
B.Schenn-Sutter-Burrows
Sbisa-L.Schenn
- phyllee

are they both on philly ? I think 1 is in TO now?
I want Luke for sure.

Edler/ (insert Buff here?) tanev
tryamkin/ schenn
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski

we'd be tough to play against

are they both on philly ? I think 1 is in TO now?
I want Luke for sure.

Edler/ (insert Buff here?)
tryamkin/ schenn
pedan / sbisa

we'd be tough to play against
- SMBDragon

Im pretty sure there both on the flyers and are both on the block. I like the D lines u have but would swap edler for hutton

Currently we are paying 20.6 mil for

Edler Tanev
Hamhuis Weber
Bart Sbisa
Hutton

For 19.1 mil it could be

Hutton 800 K Byfuglien 6.75
Tryamkin 1.5 Hamonic 3.8
Benn 1.75 Sbisa 3.6

Subban 1 mil

Trade Edler for Hamonic
Trade and sign Byf for Tanev

BTW it is Tuesday so this post is perfectly acceptable

Currently we are paying 20.6 mil for

Edler Tanev
Hamhuis Weber
Bart Sbisa
Hutton

For 19.1 mil it could be

Hutton 800 K Byfuglien 6.75
Tryamkin 1.5 Hamonic 3.8
Benn 1.75 Sbisa 3.6

Subban 1 mil

Trade Edler for Hamonic
Trade and sign Byf for Tanev
- VANTEL

Although Tryamkin is big is he good enough for top 4 defence? I havent been following him.

Im pretty sure there both on the flyers and are both on the block. I like the D lines u have but would swap edler for hutton
- phyllee

yes I knew I was forgetting someone.

ok so edler I feel needs a different partner to utilize his game

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski

better?

Although Tryamkin is big is he good enough for top 4 defence? I havent been following him.
- phyllee

We have Weber there with slow foot Hamhuis . Could it be worst?

yes I knew I was forgetting someone.

ok so edler I feel needs a different partner to utilize his game

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski

better?
- SMBDragon

Yeah that would be fine, would have enough cap to easily get lucic

Although Tryamkin is big is he good enough for top 4 defence? I havent been following him.
- phyllee

oh ya....just youtube him. I salivate every time I watch his play

We have Weber there with slow foot Hamhuis . Could it be worst?
- VANTEL

Very good point, If Sbisa continues to play good he could probably handle top 6 and tryamkin paired with Pedan

Yeah that would be fine, would have enough cap to easily get lucic
- phyllee

I'd rather have byf

Canucks did you see how the RedWings swarmed Kane as he went after Datsyuk? Look long and hard at that.

Currently we are paying 20.6 mil for

Edler Tanev
Hamhuis Weber
Bart Sbisa
Hutton

For 19.1 mil it could be

Hutton 800 K Byfuglien 6.75
Tryamkin 1.5 Hamonic 3.8
Benn 1.75 Sbisa 3.6

Subban 1 mil

Trade Edler for Hamonic
Trade and sign Byf for Tanev

BTW it is Tuesday so this post is perfectly acceptable
- VANTEL

Still missing that PMD.

Yeah that would be fine, would have enough cap to easily get lucic
- phyllee

Bye Higgins bye Burrows Hello Milan

Still missing that PMD.
- dbot

Byf Hutton

All 4 of the top 4 listed can move the puck

Very good point, If Sbisa continues to play good he could probably handle top 6 and tryamkin paired with Pedan
- phyllee

I wouldnt put 1st year guys together. thats why I put seasoned guys with them.

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski

I wouldnt put 1st year guys together. thats why I put seasoned guys with them.

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski
- SMBDragon

Touche

I heard you turds want new young defensemen on your sad sack of a team, how about frank corrado? I heard you guys are obsessed with him.

I heard you turds want new young defensemen on your sad sack of a team, how about frank corrado? I heard you guys are obsessed with him.
- Conquest

No need we will just offer sheet Rielly

I wouldnt put 1st year guys together. thats why I put seasoned guys with them.

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski
- SMBDragon

Are you crazy? The opposition would think twice about bumping our goalie or parking in the slot!

Wait, is that what we want?

are they both on philly ? I think 1 is in TO now?
I want Luke for sure.

Edler/ (insert Buff here?) tanev
tryamkin/ schenn
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski

we'd be tough to play against
- SMBDragon

They've both been on the Flyers for 4 seasons.

I wouldnt put 1st year guys together. thats why I put seasoned guys with them.

edler / schenn
tryamkin / Hutton
pedan / sbisa
bartkowski
- SMBDragon

huh?
Luke Schenn on top line?
Hutton is 'seasoned' and a rookie on 2nd line.
another rookie on 3rd line?

Dislike.

huh?
Luke Schenn on top line?
Hutton is 'seasoned' and a rookie on 2nd line.
another rookie on 3rd line?

Dislike.
- dbot

edler / schenn
pedan / sbisa
tryamkin / Hutton
bartkowski

there....better?
As I said...always pair experience with anyone new, this does that.

oh and use edler and hutton in 6 men situations....perhaps PP if using 2 D