Physics?

The immovable object (Bickell) and the irresistible force (Sharp).
- kwolf68

and the wannabe rapper stuck in the NHL (Versteeg)

Exactly Paul. Since I am a tree-hugger and all.
- kwolf68

But are you a racoon hugger?

I'm behind in my reading here, so forgive me if this sentiment hasn't already been added...

The above reminds me of a quote from Warren Buffett, which goes something along the lines of... "When someone with experience proposes a deal to someone with money, often the person with experience ends up with the money and the person with the money ends up with the experience."
- Fergie

Very true Fergie. Fergalicious defilicious

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson

But are you a racoon hugger?
- paulr

LOL. They are kinda cute so they do have the cuddle factor. Not a hugger, maybe more a liker. Is that even a thing?

thread is really taking quite a turn. Maybe we need another system depth trade.

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson
- Bjm84

Pretty solid list. I'd move McNeill up a bit, I expect him to make waves this offseason. Also maybe move Pokka up a slot.

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson
- Bjm84

How would most of us be able to do this? Unless we have seen all of them play a number of times last season you still have to factor in the competition they competed against.

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson
- Bjm84

I wouldn't classify Panarin or Dano as prospects. I would also put Ross and Hayden above Gustafsson, and work in Hinostroza somewhere in the 7-10 range. Schmaltz should also be higher than both Pokka and Johns.

Fergalicious defilicious
- nurk

I had my name LONG before she was in the picture!

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson
- Bjm84

Do u consider them prospects if some are suppose to make the opening night roster? If not, then TT should be on that list too....

Must say, this thread is comical....


between physics and now finances, whats next???
- Ur Not Me

We're beyond bored waiting for some shoes to drop. Keds, Converse, whatever needs to be done.

come on bro, its magellan.
- flyershockey

Hey ain't dat da guy what circumsized da werld wit a 100 foot schooner?

the bordom of waiting for something to happen can lead us down paths that usually wouldnt come up.
- SaskHawkFan

That's rather ominous sounding.

LOL. They are kinda cute so they do have the cuddle factor. Not a hugger, maybe more a liker. Is that even a thing?

thread is really taking quite a turn. Maybe we need another system depth trade.
- kwolf68

I'd like to see a chart showing the many directions JJ's threads have gone since the SC Final.

Fair to WHO? Mitt Romney?

So figure he has $15-20 million banked. he will never have to worry about a thing financially for the rest of his days on earth.
- John Jaeckel

Huh!?

He probably loses at least half of those earnings among taxes, agent fees, and escrow

Zero chance any of these guys take home and bank 85% of their contract. Maybe if they are smart with investments over the years they can wind up with that much

I'd like to see a chart showing the many directions JJ's threads have gone since the SC Final.
- howiehandles

Flowcharts are supposed to demonstrate a logical outcome ....

another question. i thought pictures of ice girls were no longer allowed to be used for blogs.

because you are making an assumption of 15-20 mil in the bank off of 23 mil in earnings. thats pretty far fetched. you are also assuming appearance and endoresement fees for which you have no backing whatsoever. when others throw things out with no research or backing, you hound them. is that true or false?
- flyershockey

So you're just here to argue about what? Anything and everything, do you have any backing he doesn't or are you just assuming he doesn't, can't have it both ways sunshine.

If he was in need of money wouldn't of he signed some where already? I don't know kind of makes sense, at least to me it does

Huh!?

He probably loses at least half of those earnings among taxes, agent fees, and escrow

Zero chance any of these guys take home and bank 85% of their contract. Maybe if they are smart with investments over the years they can wind up with that much
- FourFeathers773

As a board we also decided that we are assuming Oduya owns businesses and huge swedish endorsement deals.

another question. i thought pictures of ice girls were no longer allowed to be used for blogs.
- flyershockey

That's a statement not a question.

Why? Swedish NHL players are a big deal in Sweden. Fact.

Why are we even arguing about this? Oh yeah . . .
- John Jaeckel

Apparently it's so pathetic on the Flyers blog and no one wanting to talk about them that they feel they have to come over here and troll.

Curious here how everyone would re-rank the top 10 “prospects” given some of the new additions?

My guess:
1. Dano
2. Panarin
3. Pokka
4. Johns
5. Schmaltz
6. Danault
7. Knott
8. McNeill
9. Hartman
10. Gustaffson
- Bjm84

If you're listing Dano, then TT and TvR should be eligible for the list since they played about the same number of NHL games or less. So I'd go:
1. TT
2. Panarin
3. Dano
4. Johns
5. Pokka
6. Danault
7. Hartman
8. TvR
9. Schmaltz
10. Hayden

As a board we also decided that we are assuming Oduya owns businesses and huge swedish endorsement deals.
- nurk

I'll take that comment as u calling me out? Or u just making a general comment?

That's a statement not a question.
- paulr

paulr-1
flyershockey-0

I'll take that comment as u calling me out? Or u just making a general comment?
- Ur Not Me

Are you asking him or telling him?