Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Bill Meltzer: Meltzer's Musings: Gagner, Dillabaugh, Konecny, Zepp and More
Author Message
hereticpride
New Jersey Devils
Location: HEY. Does this pole still work?, NJ
Joined: 01.14.2011

Jun 29 @ 8:53 PM ET
My point was that everyone is speculating that it's drugs or something of that ilk, and with Lombardi supposedly finding out about it on Friday, that its been 3 days and nohting has been made public.

Makes it hard for me to believe that it's a legal issue.

- fecondo

You can't really terminate a contract for any other reason though.
fecondo
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Wading in the velvet sea, PA
Joined: 03.16.2008

Jun 29 @ 8:53 PM ET
In other news (may be leight)

A buyout of Sam Gagner would only cost the Flyers a cap hit of $366,667 this coming season and $566,667 the year after if Hextall chooses to go that route.
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 8:57 PM ET
My point was that everyone is speculating that it's drugs or something of that ilk, and with Lombardi supposedly finding out about it on Friday, that its been 3 days and nohting has been made public.

Makes it hard for me to believe that it's a legal issue.

- fecondo


I was just thinking it maybe it was an altercation off the ice between Richards and a Kings official, or a player? I don't know, so many questions.
nails
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: thread killer, PA
Joined: 02.05.2007

Jun 29 @ 8:58 PM ET
I would expect that from the NHLPA, since they were probably informed of this very recently. Richards is represented by a very high powered law firm.

Just thinking out loud here, the NHL could be opening a bad can of worms here. If they terminate Richards contract based on an off ice incident, that possibly didn't involve an arrest, they are setting a standard here. Any other off ice incident by another player, of the same basic level of seriousness, then has to be dealt with similarly. Or at least that is what I would argue if I was the Richards camp, or the NHLPA. I keep getting back to if it is an off ice incident, if there is no arrest, how bad could it be?

- MJL


conduct detrimental to the team is an easy one to use. Even I have gotten to use that one.
When I have seen that used though, it really was something that was going to be a black eye to a team/university (in my case).
But again, they could have used it on Voynov, so I have to think this is worse than that
UrbanAchiever
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Joined: 06.29.2015

Jun 29 @ 8:59 PM ET
What's the D line up look like this year assuming they re-sign MDZ?
johndewar
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: South Jersey, NJ
Joined: 01.16.2009

Jun 29 @ 8:59 PM ET
I was just thinking it maybe it was an altercation off the ice between Richards and a Kings official, or a player? I don't know, so many questions.
- MJL


Possible, sure.

johndewar
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: South Jersey, NJ
Joined: 01.16.2009

Jun 29 @ 8:59 PM ET
In other news (may be leight)

A buyout of Sam Gagner would only cost the Flyers a cap hit of $366,667 this coming season and $566,667 the year after if Hextall chooses to go that route.

- fecondo


I'm fine with whatever they do with Gagner.
fecondo
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Wading in the velvet sea, PA
Joined: 03.16.2008

Jun 29 @ 8:59 PM ET
I was just thinking it maybe it was an altercation off the ice between Richards and a Kings official, or a player? I don't know, so many questions.
- MJL

Indeed, far too many questions right now. Guess I'll wait to see what evidence LA has before I form an opinion. Just a crazy and strange scenario right now
dcflyerfan71
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Washington, DC
Joined: 09.18.2009

Jun 29 @ 9:00 PM ET
What if Richards was approached quietly by law enforcement and has already confessed to save him / his family a long trial and maybe buy some sentence reduction. That, I assume, if made known to LAK would be grounds to void the contract.
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:00 PM ET
conduct detrimental to the team is an easy one to use. Even I have gotten to use that one.
When I have seen that used though, it really was something that was going to be a black eye to a team/university (in my case).
But again, they could have used it on Voynov, so I have to think this is worse than that

- nails



How about fondling a police officer? Could that be considered conduct detrimental to the team, and give them a black eye?

How can it be worse then Voynov with no report of an arrest record?
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:01 PM ET
What if Richards was approached quietly by law enforcement and has already confessed to save him / his family a long trial and maybe buy some sentence reduction. That, I assume, if made known to LAK would be grounds to void the contract.
- dcflyerfan71


He would still be arrested, which would be public record, and would've been made known publicly by now.
ob18
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: That matters less than you hope it does
Joined: 07.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:01 PM ET
What if Richards was approached quietly by law enforcement and has already confessed to save him / his family a long trial and maybe buy some sentence reduction. That, I assume, if made known to LAK would be grounds to void the contract.
- dcflyerfan71


Somebody would have still leaked it, very hard to keep that quiet.
Glak18
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: "It's pretty big loogie on my face, so I was pretty psssted".", PA
Joined: 06.26.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:03 PM ET
I would expect that from the NHLPA, since they were probably informed of this very recently. Richards is represented by a very high powered law firm.

Just thinking out loud here, the NHL could be opening a bad can of worms here. If they terminate Richards contract based on an off ice incident, that possibly didn't involve an arrest, they are setting a standard here. Any other off ice incident by another player, of the same basic level of seriousness, then has to be dealt with similarly. Or at least that is what I would argue if I was the Richards camp, or the NHLPA. I keep getting back to if it is an off ice incident, if there is no arrest, how bad could it be?

- MJL


Only thing I can find:

14. The Club may also terminate this SPC upon written notice to the Player (but only after obtaining Waivers from all other Clubs) if the Player shall at any time:

(a) fail, refuse, or neglect to obey the Club's rules governing training and conduct of Players, if such failure, refusal or neglect should constitute a material breach of this SPC.

(b) fail, refuse or neglect to render his services hereunder or in any other manner materially breach this SPC.


Extremely vague.

I agree, if not arrested that means no law was broken, but doesn't mean he can't get formally arrested at a later date.

I just have a hard time thinking this termination happened without major law firms representing the Kings breaking down the ramifications over ill found evidence. Obviously DL didn't make the call on a whim.
opeth_pa
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: The Implication
Joined: 12.13.2011

Jun 29 @ 9:03 PM ET
Good deal in getting rid of Rinaldo..

I thought he brought some useful things to the the team but his repeated transgressions on the ice pretty much overruled anything good he did.

I feel like Hexy has something coming...
nails
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: thread killer, PA
Joined: 02.05.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:04 PM ET
Anyone find the comment from lombardi about not buying him out last year at the end of the article odd:
"It could be the worst decision I've ever made," he said. "But for all the right reasons."

Face value he is saying he should have bought him out because he sucks and his cap hit is terrible.
it's the but that gets me.
Like there was something wrong last year, they knew about it, but were trying to work through it with him.
it really could be drugs etc. and he didn't follow the program/clean up and it became a breach of contract by him not following the rules of his rehab.
Maybe Stoll gave Richards up as part of the plea, which would make the Friday timeline understandable.
dcflyerfan71
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Washington, DC
Joined: 09.18.2009

Jun 29 @ 9:04 PM ET
He would still be arrested, which would be public record, and would've been made known publicly by now.
- MJL

I feel that there is a long history of white collar crime that gets special treatment due tot the personality involved. I dunno - just speculating.
FlyersGrace
Season Ticket Holder
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Pronger "Play the game puffnuts!" , DE
Joined: 07.02.2012

Jun 29 @ 9:05 PM ET
Any ideas what rules are in place for performance improving drugs? Not necessarily illegal but might be cause for termination.
Course he could have just helped two criminals escape a maximum security prison in a love rectangle gone wrong.

MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:05 PM ET


I just have a hard time thinking this termination happened without major law firms representing the Kings breaking down the ramifications over ill found evidence. Obviously DL didn't make the call on a whim.

- Glak18


Richards representatives haven't had their say yet, that will come in the grievance process if there is one, and even possibly in other legal proceedings.
nails
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: thread killer, PA
Joined: 02.05.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:06 PM ET
How about fondling a police officer? Could that be considered conduct detrimental to the team, and give them a black eye?

How can it be worse then Voynov with no report of an arrest record?

- MJL


Don't know.
Just saying what I have seen in the past.
But, fondling a police officer... people giggle at that.
And, lets be honest.
Stars get away with stuff that other don't.
Patrick Kane.

Not fair, but that's just reality
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:08 PM ET
i refuse to speculate as it is not fair to anyone so im just going to assume he was chomping percocets by the handful
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:09 PM ET
Any ideas what rules are in place for performance improving drugs? Not necessarily illegal but might be cause for termination.
Course he could have just helped two criminals escape a maximum security prison in a love rectangle gone wrong.

- FlyersGrace


Players are tested for performance enhancing drugs during training camp and during the season. I don't think that's it.
Bullet_Bills
Buffalo Sabres
Location: Buffalo, NY
Joined: 07.31.2009

Jun 29 @ 9:09 PM ET
Way off topic but check out this LEGO bubble hockey project. https://ideas.lego.com/projects/84032 Unfortunately it needs 10,000 supporters to even be considered as a real set.
Glak18
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: "It's pretty big loogie on my face, so I was pretty psssted".", PA
Joined: 06.26.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:10 PM ET
Somebody would have still leaked it, very hard to keep that quiet.
- ob18


Unless it's under the Patriot Act, then no one is leaking nothing. For the record that does not mean terrorism.
nails
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: thread killer, PA
Joined: 02.05.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:10 PM ET
Players are tested for performance enhancing drugs during training camp and during the season. I don't think that's it.
- MJL


besides, this year, it didn't help
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Candyland, PA
Joined: 09.20.2007

Jun 29 @ 9:10 PM ET
Don't know.
Just saying what I have seen in the past.
But, fondling a police officer... people giggle at that.
And, lets be honest.
Stars get away with stuff that other don't.
Patrick Kane.

Not fair, but that's just reality

- nails


Good point, Patrick Kane assaulted a taxi driver, correct? Why wasn't his contract terminated? I guess maybe because Chicago still wanted him as a player?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49  Next