Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Saturday Leafs News & Notes
Author Message
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Jun 13 @ 7:05 PM ET
5 years eats into when we want to be a contender. A little long for my taste.
- RogerRoeper


I like the way you think!
John6644
Location: Mansfield , ON
Joined: 02.23.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:06 PM ET
thing is, they'd have to trade other players. Can't trade a guy for 12 months if they match an offer sheet.

it forces them into a decision of giving up a guy like connolly for less than market, or trading another roster player.

Given boston will likely have to trade a player or 2 to keep Hamilton, they may not be inclined to lose other roster players just to keep a guy like connolly.

- Tumbleweed


I agree 100%. It seems like a great opportunity to push the envelope. The Leafs seem to be open to doing things a different way. Maybe this too?
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON
Joined: 09.12.2007

Jun 13 @ 7:06 PM ET
I agree but it might be necessary for LA fit Kessel's salary. I might prefer Richards 5.25 or whatever for 5 years over Semin's 7 for 3 years.
- Phenom


Id take Semin. Shorter burden plus they have a pick worth more than anything LA would be willing big to give up.
Jeropotato
Season Ticket Holder
Edmonton Oilers
Joined: 01.03.2013

Jun 13 @ 7:06 PM ET
thing is, they'd have to trade other players. Can't trade a guy for 12 months if they match an offer sheet.

it forces them into a decision of giving up a guy like connolly for less than market, or trading another roster player.

Given boston will likely have to trade a player or 2 to keep Hamilton, they may not be inclined to lose other roster players just to keep a guy like connolly.

- Tumbleweed



Someway, somehow, they need to cut 6-8 million this year. Any team with cap space and future assets to spare should be prepared to low ball them. With all the NMC's they have pretty sure everyone else can be had for a song, much like Boychuck was.
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly
Joined: 05.07.2013

Jun 13 @ 7:07 PM ET
5 years eats into when we want to be a contender. A little long for my taste.
- RogerRoeper

You expect this team to be a contender in five years?
Sammich
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: You're the fukin best Bellows!
Joined: 02.10.2011

Jun 13 @ 7:07 PM ET
semin is lazy
richards is fat and lazy

semin>richards
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Jun 13 @ 7:07 PM ET
You expect this team to be a contender in five years?
- BetterCallSaul


You noticed that too?
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Jun 13 @ 7:07 PM ET
Id take Semin. Shorter burden plus they have a pick worth more than anything LA would be willing big to give up.
- systemtool



I bet u would... .............
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly
Joined: 05.07.2013

Jun 13 @ 7:08 PM ET
semin is lazy
richards is fat and lazy

semin>richards

- Sammich

I'm sure Richards can throw a proper punch though.

Richards>Semin.
John6644
Location: Mansfield , ON
Joined: 02.23.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:08 PM ET
You expect this team to be a contender in five years?
- BetterCallSaul


God I hope so!
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Jun 13 @ 7:08 PM ET
You expect this team to be a contender in five years?
- BetterCallSaul

Yes I do. 5 years is a long time.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Jun 13 @ 7:09 PM ET
God I hope so!
- John6644



Oh
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK
Joined: 03.15.2014

Jun 13 @ 7:10 PM ET
Oh
- Fruitcakenipple

Oh
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly
Joined: 05.07.2013

Jun 13 @ 7:10 PM ET
Yes I do. 5 years is a long time.
- RogerRoeper

You're more optimistic than I am. Perennial playoff contender in five years, sure. Stanley Cup contender? Don't think so.
Tumbleweed
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: avid reader of the daily douche news
Joined: 03.14.2014

Jun 13 @ 7:11 PM ET
I agree 100%. It seems like a great opportunity to push the envelope. The Leafs seem to be open to doing things a different way. Maybe this too?
- John6644


anytime you can acquire a guy that can be a good fit for the team for less than market value, i think you should look into it.
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Jun 13 @ 7:11 PM ET
You're more optimistic than I am. Perennial playoff contender in five years, sure. Stanley Cup contender? Don't think so.
- BetterCallSaul


They already will have some good starting pieces at the end of the draft.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Jun 13 @ 7:12 PM ET
Oh
- ClarksonDavid


Agreed
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON
Joined: 08.12.2010

Jun 13 @ 7:13 PM ET
Gabby is an injury away from retirement or just completely falli BFF apart IMO. Kings have good enough young pieces where Kessel would make them more competitive for longer than Gabor will, but of course the money doesn't make sense.for LA
- systemtool


If Williams and Stoll bolt as UFAs and we take Richards, I think they could work it out.
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly
Joined: 05.07.2013

Jun 13 @ 7:16 PM ET
Someway, somehow, they need to cut 6-8 million this year. Any team with cap space and future assets to spare should be prepared to low ball them. With all the NMC's they have pretty sure everyone else can be had for a song, much like Boychuck was.
- Jeropotato

Maybe the Leafs could try extending an olive branch to the Bruins and offering to help ease the burden at the price of a few draft picks.
John6644
Location: Mansfield , ON
Joined: 02.23.2015

Jun 13 @ 7:16 PM ET
You're more optimistic than I am. Perennial playoff contender in five years, sure. Stanley Cup contender? Don't think so.
- BetterCallSaul


Well we don't know for sure of course, but I'm hoping they are a little better than just a playoff contender by then. Otherwise it means they are still sitting around the 7 through 10 spot and we've spent too many years doing that. If that's all the progress we make in 5 years we'll be blowing it up again.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Jun 13 @ 7:19 PM ET
Well we don't know for sure of course, but I'm hoping they are a little better than just a playoff contender by then. Otherwise it means they are still sitting around the 7 through 10 spot and we've spent too many years doing that. If that's all the progress we make in 5 years we'll be blowing it up again.
- John6644



In 2yrs the Leafs will be trading picks and hoping to "win now"...
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Jun 13 @ 7:19 PM ET
Well we don't know for sure of course, but I'm hoping they are a little better than just a playoff contender by then. Otherwise it means they are still sitting around the 7 through 10 spot and we've spent too many years doing that. If that's all the progress we make in 5 years we'll be blowing it up again.
- John6644


Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON
Joined: 08.12.2010

Jun 13 @ 7:21 PM ET
5 years eats into when we want to be a contender. A little long for my taste.
- RogerRoeper


For how long, a year? Wouldn't make much of a difference.
H8terade
Joined: 06.20.2014

Jun 13 @ 7:23 PM ET
Ah. Nothing like riling up the Oilers thread with a little Phaneuf talk. I kinda what him dealt there just so I can watch all of their heads explode!
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC
Joined: 08.10.2008

Jun 13 @ 7:24 PM ET
Ah. Nothing like riling up the Oilers thread with a little Phaneuf talk. I kinda what him dealt there just so I can watch all of their heads explode!
- H8terade


Just like if Hodgson signs with the Leafs. Same thing.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34  Next