vancity787
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: My Parents Basement, BC Joined: 07.14.2008
|
|
|
Wow, Johnny Hockey. Clutch! |
|
|
|
come on, there was clearly a white portion between the puck and the red line which, based on rudimentary physics, means that the puck is over the line. If that's not conclusive then I don't know what is.
Again, I'm not a Calgary fan and am actually hoping they are ousted by Anaheim; however, this is just f*cking ridiculous. You're telling me that wasn't conclusive? - Zogg
Even the announcers were asking is that snow on the line or is that white ice. There was no angle proving the puck was without a doubt 100% over. We know it was over but there was no clear cut camera shot proving it. |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
come on, there was clearly a white portion between the puck and the red line which, based on rudimentary physics, means that the puck is over the line. If that's not conclusive then I don't know what is.
Again, I'm not a Calgary fan and am actually hoping they are ousted by Anaheim; however, this is just f*cking ridiculous. You're telling me that wasn't conclusive? - Zogg
Oh the Hockey Gods are toying with our emotions :lol... |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Even the announcers were asking is that snow on the line or is that white ice. There was no angle proving the puck was without a doubt 100% over. We know it was over but there was no clear cut camera shot proving it. - VANTEL
There was clearly a white gap between the puck and the red line - so what if it was snow? you can line up the red line from one side to to the other even if there was snow, which means there is only one conclusion - it was a f*cking goal. Let's not get retarded about this, mkay. Pretty obvious, at least to me |
|
|
|
There was clearly a white gap between the puck and the red line - so what if it was snow? you can line up the red line from one side to to the other even if there was snow, which means there is only one conclusion - it was a f*cking goal. Let's not get retarded about this, mkay. Pretty obvious, at least to me - Zogg
Show me the picture where it shows . They made the right call. If you have a different angle let's see it.
That is no different than knowing a puck is under a pad and in the net. You need the undoubtably proof before you call it a goal |
|
vancity787
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: My Parents Basement, BC Joined: 07.14.2008
|
|
|
I finally got a look at the replay. The fukking puck was over the line. No question about it. |
|
|
|
There was clearly a white gap between the puck and the red line - so what if it was snow? you can line up the red line from one side to to the other even if there was snow, which means there is only one conclusion - it was a f*cking goal. Let's not get retarded about this, mkay. Pretty obvious, at least to me - Zogg
Hey buddy just flag someone you'll feel better. |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Show me the picture where it shows . They made the right call. If you have a different angle let's see it.
That is no different than knowing a puck is under a pad and in the net. You need the undoubtably proof before you call it a goal - VANTEL
Not even close to being the same situation. Which part of the 'puck was clearly over the line' did you not agree with? The one angle definitely shows the puck over the line. End of story, we'll have to agree to disagree. |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Hey buddy just flag someone you'll better.  - A_SteamingLombardi
Flagged |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Flagged  - Zogg
Same. |
|
vancity787
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: My Parents Basement, BC Joined: 07.14.2008
|
|
|
Grumpy13
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 01.09.2014
|
|
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
Last year we went to Isla Muheras (island of women) and it was swell, the diving was amazing, but its damn near South America; I think the weather honestly is roughly the same all through mexico at this time... hot, humid. - jeffgouldonfire
Been to Isla Mujeres, cool little island |
|
|
|
Been to Isla Mujeres, cool little island  - bezz44
It is indeed |
|
|
|
Been to Isla Mujeres, cool little island  - bezz44
Except the paying for TP part. When you're feeling the after effects of the night before. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
FA List
Centers
Jim Slater 4th
Mark Letestu 4th
Right Wing
Ryan White 4th
Jay beagle 4th
Left Wing
Matt Belesky 3rd
Defence
Jeff Petry 3/4
Zbynek Michalek 5/6
Adam McQuaid 4/5
|
|
|
|
FA List
Centers
Jim Slater 4th
Mark Letestu 4th
Right Wing
Ryan White 4th
Jay beagle 4th
Left Wing
Matt Belesky 3rd
Defence
Jeff Petry 3/4
Zbynek Michalek 5/6
Adam McQuaid 4/5 - manvanfan
No Franson?
All will be overpriced
|
|
|
|
No Franson?
All will be overpriced - VANTEL
If there was ever a time that I wanted no NTC's it would be this year. |
|
|
|
There was clearly a white gap between the puck and the red line - so what if it was snow? you can line up the red line from one side to to the other even if there was snow, which means there is only one conclusion - it was a f*cking goal. Let's not get retarded about this, mkay. Pretty obvious, at least to me - Zogg
http://www.thehockeynews....as-a-goal-check-this-out/ |
|
|
|
If there was ever a time that I wanted no NTC's it would be this year. - thundachunk
The only player I would want in UFA pool is Beleskey, but I am pretty sure he will be swallowed up
Trades will be the fashionable way to go this year. I think this will be. Good yer to discourage players on becoming UFAs |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
No Franson?
All will be overpriced - VANTEL
No franson. And over course. We think everyone is overpriced these days. You didn't want to give Tanev over 4. Sbisa's not worth 3.6. They are 4th liners, 2nd 3rd pairing D. Will probably still be cheaper then what we have. |
|
|
|
The only player I would want in UFA pool is Beleskey, but I am pretty sure he will be swallowed up - VANTEL
I don't think he will be in Anaheim after their season is over. He was put in the skybox on a few different occasions for bad attitude and unspecified misconduct. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
No Franson?
All will be overpriced - VANTEL
No franson. And over course. We think everyone is overpriced these days. You didn't want to give Tanev over 4. Sbisa's not worth 3.6. They are 4th liners, 2nd 3rd pairing D. Will probably still be cheaper then what we have. |
|
|
|
The only player I would want in UFA pool is Beleskey, but I am pretty sure he will be swallowed up - VANTEL
I don't think he will be in Anaheim after their season is over. He was put in the skybox on a few different occasions for bad attitude and unspecified misconduct. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
 |
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/if-youre-convinced-sam-bennetts-shot-was-a-goal-check-this-out/ - VANTEL
Nobody likes the flames |
|