They don't need another center...
- WaterBoy

Yeah, and this was in support of your statement. THey don't need another center, but the Habs can't land another center without unloading at least one.

Neutral site.
Go Habs
- habs12

GBA

Yeah, and this was in support of your statement. THey don't need another center, but the Habs can't land another center without unloading at least one.
- EssuieToutJeune

One team can never have too many good centers.

They could unload the unnecessary ones they have.

One team can never have too many good centers.

They could unload the unnecessary ones they have.
- Pecafan Fan

This also applies to 6-7th dmen, according to Bergevin.

One team can never have too many good centers.

They could unload the unnecessary ones they have.
- Pecafan Fan

I doubt there are teams lining up for the unnecessary Habs centers.

I doubt there are teams lining up for the unnecessary Habs centers.
- WaterBoy

Pretty sure Desharnais holds value. Especially with his cap hit.

I doubt there are teams lining up for the unnecessary Habs centers.
- WaterBoy

Habs are buyers. They won't be moving roster players at the deadline unless it is to make room for an acquisition.

Vanek didn't cost a roster player. Neither will a guy like Vermette.

Habs are buyers. They won't be moving roster players at the deadline unless it is to make room for an acquisition.

Vanek didn't cost a roster player. Neither will a guy like Vermette.
- blarneylad

I'd try to get Boedker, not Vermette.

Pretty sure Desharnais holds value. Especially with his cap hit.
- Pecafan Fan

True.

Pretty sure the Habs want to hold on to him

Habs are buyers. They won't be moving roster players at the deadline unless it is to make room for an acquisition.

Vanek didn't cost a roster player. Neither will a guy like Vermette.
- blarneylad

Vermette

Center, that can play wing that would'nt the Habs at all

- Pecafan Fan

Haineux vont hainer

So what ended happening?

So, who's right?
- TouenneTiiTree

I thought we were talking about the play with 5 minutes left in the game, in the context of what the right play was AT THE TIME; I didn't know we were talking about hindsight. In that case, it was clearly Seattle's goal to fall behind 16-0 at the half, have their QB toss more interceptions than completions to his own team, sport a QB rating under 10.0 until the 4th quarter, as this was all part of their plan to lull GB into a false sense of security.

What a sly coach, that Pete Carroll is.

Haineux vont hainer
- stinger67

Boom.

Vermette

Center, that can play wing that would'nt the Habs at all
- WaterBoy

Honestly I haven't really seen him play since he was with the Sens.

It was an example of adding a roster guy that has flexibility to play wing or center and solid two way play without subtracting the bodies the Habs will likely need to survive the playoffs.

Vermette

Center, that can play wing that would'nt the Habs at all
- WaterBoy

I love Vermette. Versatile player.
Plekanec-Vermette-Desharnais is not bad.
Galchenyuk requested to play wing, so be it.

True.

Pretty sure the Habs want to hold on to him
- WaterBoy

Gotta hate the guy that shows up at every game.

Honestly I haven't really seen him play since he was with the Sens.

It was an example of adding a roster guy that has flexibility to play wing or center and solid two way play without subtracting the bodies the Habs will likely need to survive the playoffs.
- blarneylad

He's gonna cost a lot.

I love Vermette. Versatile player.
Plekanec-Vermette-Desharnais is not bad.
Galchenyuk requested to play wing, so be it.
- Not_Yan

Vermette is dreamy good looking

I love Vermette. Versatile player.
Plekanec-Vermette-Desharnais is not bad.
Galchenyuk requested to play wing, so be it.
- Not_Yan

He's clearly an update over Eller.

I love Vermette. Versatile player.
Plekanec-Vermette-Desharnais is not bad.
Galchenyuk requested to play wing, so be it.
- Not_Yan

I said, BOEDKER!

I said, BOEDKER!
- Pecafan Fan

You just want another Dane to hate.

I thought we were talking about the play with 5 minutes left in the game, in the context of what the right play was AT THE TIME; I didn't know we were talking about hindsight. In that case, it was clearly Seattle's goal to fall behind 16-0 at the half, have their QB toss more interceptions than completions to his own team, sport a QB rating under 10.0 until the 4th quarter, as this was all part of their plan to lull GB into a false sense of security.

What a sly coach, that Pete Carroll is.
- 3M

I'm not talking about hindsight...I said it has he went down yesterday. I understand the logic behind it (sliding)...but it was too early in the game. The game was not sealed-up at that time, but the acted as if it were. Plus McCarthy went all conservative on the 2 drives trying to "eat-up clock"...which resulted in two 3-n-outs which only compounded the previous mental-error.

The end result validates my point...

I said, BOEDKER!
- Pecafan Fan

I doubt he's available to be honest

I'm not talking about hindsight...I said it has he went down yesterday. I understand the logic behind it (sliding)...but it was too early in the game. The game was not sealed-up at that time, but the acted as if it were. Plus McCarthy went all conservative on the 2 drives trying to "eat-up clock"...which resulted in 3-n-outs which only compounded the previous mental-error.

The end result validates my point...
- TouenneTiiTree

So, it's hindsight, but you just don't want to call it hindsight? Okay, you win.