hey, glucks.

if you ever don't get your facts straight it's okay because you can just disappear for a couple days and come back and not have your facts straight again! it's great!

just act like nothing ever happened and be as arrogant of a loser as you want to be!
- kicksave856

That sounds pretty easy!



Crap...

kijiji

kijiji
- dt99999

hihihi

They don't do a private ceremony, they do a private identification where they are compelled to uncover their face. So they don't (do a private ceremony).

Try and get your facts straight.

It's not any kind of phobia, it's a stand, a line in the sand, where most Canadians want the gradual erosion of our way of life, culture & heritage, to end and understand that Canadian Citizenship is a privilege and not a right. Rights come after you're become a Citizen, not before.



A public-opinion poll ordered by Prime Minister Stephen Harper earlier this year found overwhelming support among Canadians for the requirement that women remove their niqabs or burkas at citizenship ceremonies.

The March telephone survey by Léger Marketing found 82 per cent of Canadians favoured the policy somewhat or strongly, with just 15 per cent opposed. Support was widespread, but especially strong in Quebec, where 93 per cent were in favour of the requirement.

http://news.nationalpost....ives-niqab-ban-poll-finds
- D0PPELGANGER

Im sorry. It's not a private ceremony. It's private identification for someone going into that ceremony.

I wonder if everyone in that poll was made aware of the private identification, or if they were just on the xenophobic side of the line in the sand.

Im sorry. It's not a private ceremony. It's private identification for someone going into that ceremony.

I wonder if everyone in that poll was made aware of the private identification, or if they were just on the xenophobic side of the line in the sand.
- Feeling Glucky?

Participants in the survey were asked “do you support or oppose a requirement that people show their face during Canadian citizenship ceremonies?”

Eighty-two per cent of those surveyed supported the requirement, 15 per cent opposed and four per cent didn’t know or refused to answer. The most common answer in the poll being the need for identification.

The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.


No mention of race, religion or gender...............just showing their face.









In 12 focus groups conducted at the same time, participants gave more context to why they supported the ban.

“Participants felt that those who attended such ceremonies needed to be clearly identifiable and did not think it made sense that someone should be able to hide their face,” said Leger’s report.

“Other participants felt that this was first and foremost a value-based issue. To them, this was about new immigrants embracing Canadian values when being welcomed as new citizens. Removing their niqab or burka was the normal thing to do in Canada and therefore, the Canadian government was right in issuing this direction about showing their faces.”

Participants in the survey were asked “do you support or oppose a requirement that people show their face during Canadian citizenship ceremonies?”

Eighty-two per cent of those surveyed supported the requirement, 15 per cent opposed and four per cent didn’t know or refused to answer. The most common answer in the poll being the need for identification.

The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.


No mention of race, religion or gender...............just showing their face.


- D0PPELGANGER

i mean, it could apply to anyone guys

Participants in the survey were asked “do you support or oppose a requirement that people show their face during Canadian citizenship ceremonies?”

Eighty-two per cent of those surveyed supported the requirement, 15 per cent opposed and four per cent didn’t know or refused to answer. The most common answer in the poll being the need for identification.

The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.


No mention of race, religion or gender...............just showing their face.
- D0PPELGANGER

So, no mention of a private identification done before the ceremony.


90% of Canadians see the charter of rights as a symbol of Canada. It's number one on the list, tied with the flag.

And it protects the right to wear religious garments.

i mean, it could apply to anyone guys
- the_cause2000

How would people know that's what they were referring to? It's not like Harper is talking about it endlessly to deflect away from the state of the economy or bill c51, or anything like that.

What kind of sex Sean Avery was into. Oxy, percocet, cialis and laxatives. Interesting mixture

What kind of sex Sean Avery was into. Oxy, percocet, cialis and laxatives. Interesting mixture
- Lahey

- the_cause2000

Im sorry. It's not a private ceremony. It's private identification for someone going into that ceremony.

I wonder if everyone in that poll was made aware of the private identification, or if they were just on the xenophobic side of the line in the sand.
- Feeling Glucky?

Who gives a poop? If we make them show their face, who cares?

If we don't, again, who cares?

Who gives a poop? If we make them show their face, who cares?

If we don't, again, who cares?
- BINGO!

I kinda like to know what I'm hitting on

I kinda like to know what I'm hitting on
- Lahey

I assumed a black ghost.

I assumed a black ghost.
- BINGO!

Dude you need a soul to become a ghost that's the whole point.

Dude you need a soul to become a ghost that's the whole point.
- dt99999

Well are they, like, the absence of a ghost, then?

- Crimsoninja

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand

I'm not sure what is so hard to understand
- Lahey

only reason i know what it means is because of experience

explain to me how it makes sense though

only reason i know what it means is because of experience

explain to me how it makes sense though
- Crimsoninja

Two lanes converge into one? I don't see the issue here.

only reason i know what it means is because of experience

explain to me how it makes sense though
- Crimsoninja

time to run someones license through the data base again

So, no mention of a private identification done before the ceremony.


90% of Canadians see the charter of rights as a symbol of Canada. It's number one on the list, tied with the flag.

And it protects the right to wear religious garments.
- Feeling Glucky?

That's your mistake. A Niqab is NOT a religious garment, neither is a Burka.

BTW, the charter of rights applies to Canadian Citizens, not someone who is in the process of becoming one. Are you okay with non Canadian Citizens telling you and all of us what is allowed in our Citizenship ceremony?

http://www.quran-islam.or...ess_code_%28P1150%29.html


http://www.answering-christianity.com/niqab_no.htm

That's your mistake. A Niqab is NOT a religious garment, neither is a Burka.

http://www.quran-islam.or...ess_code_%28P1150%29.html
- D0PPELGANGER

you put a b where an r goes

That's your mistake. A Niqab is NOT a religious garment, neither is a Burka.

BTW, the charter of rights applies to Canadian Citizens, not someone who is in the process of becoming one. Are you okay with non Canadian Citizens telling you and all of us what is allowed in our Citizenship ceremony?

http://www.quran-islam.or...ess_code_%28P1150%29.html


http://www.answering-christianity.com/niqab_no.htm
- D0PPELGANGER

Is divorce an affront against God?
Are Christians allowed to drink alcohol or eat pork?

Religions change over time. You're not the arbiter of what is and isn't a legitimate religious practice.

Also, those people aren't the ones telling the Harper government they can't ban the niqqab and hijab... It's the supreme courts. Are you OK with a government that tries to ignore the courts? To me that's a far bigger issue than a piece of cloth on the head that doesn't interfere with anything.

Is divorce an affront against God?
Are Christians allowed to drink alcohol or eat pork?

Religions change over time. You're not the arbiter of what is and isn't a legitimate religious practice.
- Feeling Glucky?

pretty sure he is, bro.