Jocelyn26
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Libertyville, IL Joined: 05.04.2010
|
|
|
True, but TT is 6 years younger with a cap hit that is $1M less. TT would have been a good value, too. - Dannyboy
and about 20 goals less. |
|
|
|
I agree with that.
However, what makes you think they'll l GET any 2nd line center if cap lands below 71 million? NExt year the growth will be similar and they'll be up $hits creek again. that's my point.
if the Hawks MISJUDGED the cap this year, then somebody better be held accountable because it will start a chain of events for not only this year, but next year as well....and teams aren't going to give you the return next summer they will this year for an Oduya or Sharp. - SteveRain
They didn't misjudge the cap. They just didn't want to give up Saad AND Leddy plus a high pick for an injury prone player who would have made it near impossible to keep this core together.
|
|
Dannyboy
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 06.25.2010
|
|
|
It's because the Hawks offer HAD to include Saad, a first and probably Leddy to complete the deal. - CaptainBlackhawk
And how do you know that? I thought it was being reported by multiple sources that Vancouver wanted TT and Stan couldn't part with him. |
|
|
|
And how do you know that? I thought it was being reported by multiple sources that Vancouver wanted TT and Stan couldn't part with him. - Dannyboy
Because Bonino right now is a significantly better piece than TT. That's why. |
|
Sconnie
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Milwaukee, WI Joined: 08.20.2009
|
|
|
I agree with that.
However, what makes you think they'll l GET any 2nd line center if cap lands below 71 million? NExt year the growth will be similar and they'll be up $hits creek again. that's my point.
if the Hawks MISJUDGED the cap this year, then somebody better be held accountable because it will start a chain of events for not only this year, but next year as well....and teams aren't going to give you the return next summer they will this year for an Oduya or Sharp. - SteveRain
Really glad we ran out and threw all that money at Crow while we were still drunk on champagne |
|
JRoenick97
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Spokane, WA Joined: 07.20.2012
|
|
|
@DarrenDreger
Told the Coyotes are strongly considering buying out Mike Ribeiro. The veteran forward is under contract through 2016-2017. Not official.
I haven't watched him much since Dallas. Anyone know whether he'd still be worth a band-aid for a year or 2? |
|
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: 5.13.4.9 Joined: 02.23.2012
|
|
|
True, but TT is 6 years younger with a cap hit that is $1M less. TT would have been a good value, too. - Dannyboy
There's no guarantee TT is ready yet. Plus, Teravainen could play 3C or on the wing. |
|
ArlingtonRob
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: 230 years was a good run, IL Joined: 01.20.2012
|
|
|
"We like Andrew Shaw as our 2C...." - hawks2010
Shaw's fine, and I'm glad he's on the club...
...but I really have doubt's that he's the answer at 2C. |
|
Return of the Roar
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Solidly grounded in reality, IL Joined: 07.27.2009
|
|
|
Because Bonino right now is a significantly better piece than TT. That's why. - CaptainBlackhawk
Which means he is being overvalued by the Hawk FO.
|
|
bogiedoc
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: VA Joined: 09.27.2011
|
|
|
Renaud Lavoie @renlavoietva 3s
Concerning Ryan Kesler, Blackhawks were interested but the impact on the cap was a concern, specially for the 15-1f season. - mrpaulish
gee...i wonder why...what is so special about the 2015-16 season...: oh yeah kane and toews looking like a 20 mil hit and leddy, saad and krugs are RFA's with a cap that might be going up less than expected...
hawks did not have the cap flex and they sure as hell were not going to give up their only 1st round pick
Ducks had the cap flex and two 1st round picks and a player and a decent young player they were willing to deal... |
|
EnzoD
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Denver, CO Joined: 02.19.2014
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with some forward thinking while still remaining competitive for the Cup. Would have loved Kesler, but there are other moves they can still make and noticeably improve the team without having to purge more than they want to.  - howiehandles
Yes. and they would likely be able to add a solid UFA or 2 with the Cap space freed up in a Sharp trade. |
|
|
|
True, but TT is 6 years younger with a cap hit that is $1M less. TT would have been a good value, too. - Dannyboy
And TT has 2 points in the nhl. Bonino scored 52 last year. Five more than saad. |
|
|
|
Which means he is being overvalued by the Hawk FO. - Return of the Roar
No. It means the Hawks weren't ready to part with Saad in this deal for Kesler. |
|
eburgio
|
|
 |
Location: SF, CA Joined: 07.18.2011
|
|
|
gee...i wonder why...what is so special about the 2015-16 season...: oh yeah kane and toews looking like a 20 mil hit and leddy, saad and krugs are RFA's with a cap that might be going up less than expected...
hawks did not have the cap flex and they sure as hell were not going to give up their only 1st round pick
Ducks had the cap flex and two 1st round picks and a player and a decent young player they were willing to deal... - bogiedoc
Right, so by that math, you can look at guys like Vermette, NIelsen, Spezza, Bonino (doubt it happens), Eller...as your center targets, either because they are affordable, or have limited term |
|
EnzoD
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Denver, CO Joined: 02.19.2014
|
|
|
@DarrenDreger
Told the Coyotes are strongly considering buying out Mike Ribeiro. The veteran forward is under contract through 2016-2017. Not official.
I haven't watched him much since Dallas. Anyone know whether he'd still be worth a band-aid for a year or 2? - JRoenick97
he's a wussy but his hands are silky and he refuses to shoot the puck...at 2 mil cap hit id take him |
|
SteveRain
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Connor Murphy Sucks, IL Joined: 05.07.2010
|
|
|
They didn't misjudge the cap. They just didn't want to give up Saad AND Leddy plus a high pick for an injury prone player who would have made it near impossible to keep this core together. - CaptainBlackhawk
They did misjudge the cap if it comes in at 68 million or 69 and NOT 71. That has a direct snowball affect on NOT only this year, but next year as well. There future budgets will be off at least 2-3 million and that may force AN extra body to go.
I guarantee those Kane/Toews deals are being held up right now because of the fact that the owners are scrambling to get that cap up right now. They, Hawks, need 71 million. |
|
ArlingtonRob
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: 230 years was a good run, IL Joined: 01.20.2012
|
|
|
@DarrenDreger
Told the Coyotes are strongly considering buying out Mike Ribeiro. The veteran forward is under contract through 2016-2017. Not official.
I haven't watched him much since Dallas. Anyone know whether he'd still be worth a band-aid for a year or 2? - JRoenick97
I want to see the Hawks compete for cups, not reach for the medicine cabinet.
Just say no to Ribiero... |
|
BlazinMike
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 05.08.2013
|
|
|
@DarrenDreger
Told the Coyotes are strongly considering buying out Mike Ribeiro. The veteran forward is under contract through 2016-2017. Not official.
I haven't watched him much since Dallas. Anyone know whether he'd still be worth a band-aid for a year or 2? - JRoenick97
Pretty sure he was a healthy scratch more than a few times this past season. |
|
|
|
They did misjudge the cap if it comes in at 68 million or 69 and NOT 71. That has a direct snowball affect on NOT only this year, but next year as well. There future budgets will be off at least 2-3 million and that may force AN extra body to go.
I guarantee those Kane/Toews deals are being held up right now because of the fact that the owners are scrambling to get that cap up right now. They, Hawks, need 71 million. - SteveRain
Ummm, the Hawks can't sign Toews or Kane yet. Nothing is being "held up". |
|
ChicagoDave
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 02.20.2013
|
|
|
I would be more than happy if the hawks are able to secure a vermette or turris this offseason |
|
tomcat24
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Gomer's Pyle, IL Joined: 06.04.2012
|
|
|
That'll pretty much eliminate any talks of Spezza or Stastny.
Suppose Bowman could trade for #1 and draft a C, but that's too ballsy of a move. - Hawks82
I would like it but I still don't think tallon takes it. I know he wants someone to help him now make the playoffs but other teams can still come up with a better offer than that, I think. Of course even if we get the #1 we could use it for other trades, too, not just keep it. Even though I'm fine with ekblad or one of the Sams |
|
z1990z
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: NW USA Joined: 02.09.2012
|
|
|
Bottom line is we STILL NEED C HELP!!!!! A piece needs to go. To say Shaw and TT can hold the #2 spot is a rediculous assumption. Now is the prime time to move Sharp. Get a damn legit C Stanley!!! |
|
JRoenick97
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Spokane, WA Joined: 07.20.2012
|
|
|
Pretty sure he was a healthy scratch more than a few times this past season. - BlazinMike
Just saw his FO% was at like 43 last season. Damn, i thought he used to be good. |
|
Return of the Roar
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
 |
Location: Solidly grounded in reality, IL Joined: 07.27.2009
|
|
|
No. It means the Hawks weren't ready to part with Saad in this deal for Kesler. - CaptainBlackhawk
If you look at what ANA gave up, no one that fits Saad's profile was in their deal. My Spidey sense tells me SB offered nothing of equal or better value in return, likely not even TT.
We will never see a real value for value deal made by this front office. Too conservative.
|
|
|
|
To the Frans Nielsen folks...
what do you think nets Nielsen here to Chicago? |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 Next |