Buick?
- UnnamedSource

- Ogilthorpe2

Grand National.

Grand National.
- EKolb13

That was like THE car when I was in High School. That, and the Monte Carlo SS.

It's not so much being a Q guy as a few have stated but more being a guy Q trusts on the ice......and as shown he gives young players who work hard a fair chance.
- UnnamedSource

Interesting point. It's definitely something to take into consideration.

That was like THE car when I was in High School. That, and the Monte Carlo SS.
- Ogilthorpe2

I remember those.

Grand National.
- EKolb13

The last muscle car......

So lines with TT in the lineup?

10 19 23
28 86 81
65 16 11
52 12 26

This assumes, obviously, that Bickell and Saad are still oot.

Interesting point. It's definitely something to take into consideration.
- EKolb13

Please let me know your final analysis once all the data is collected......

question: Do the folks in Kuala lumpur play hockey ? I know they can all fly.

Please let me know your final analysis once all the data is collected......
- UnnamedSource

question: Do the folks in Kuala lumpur play hockey ? I know they can all fly.
- spanky

?

So lines with TT in the lineup?

10 19 23
28 86 81
65 16 11
52 12 26

This assumes, obviously, that Bickell and Saad are still oot.
- Ogilthorpe2

With Kane out, I was thinking that maybe they start Teravainen on the wing instead?

So lines with TT in the lineup?

10 19 23
28 86 81
65 16 11
52 12 26

This assumes, obviously, that Bickell and Saad are still oot.
- Ogilthorpe2

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 20
81 86 88
65 16 29
52 26 12


Omfg

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 20
81 86 88
65 16 29
52 26 12


Omfg
- mrpaulish

Hossa and Kane both play RW so won't me on the same line. Plus you left out Smith.

10-19-88
20-86-81
29-65-23
52-16-28
12, 26

With Kane out, I was thinking that maybe they start Teravainen on the wing instead?
- EKolb13

10 19 23
65 28 81
11 16 86
52 12 26

?

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 20
81 86 88
65 16 29
52 26 12


Omfg
- mrpaulish

Full lineup you have separate Kane and TT....to much the same.


29-19-88
10-86-81
20-65-23
52-16-28

26/12

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 20
81 86 88
65 16 29
52 26 12


Omfg
- mrpaulish

No Versteeg?

Edit: yeah, and Smith?

A lot is made about the chances given and lack thereof to young players in the Hawk system. Many of us have a different point of view as to why certain players don't succeed under Q. However when you watch Bollig and Smith work hard, remain consistent, and play like they don't want to let go of their spot on the ice the answer is and will always be right in front of us.

Bollig & Smith, like Krugman and Shaw in the past get better every game. Smith, whom I thought was a bridge player like Morin & Pirri may have found a permanent spot on this year for the next few years. He will be cheap, works hard, and is versatile. Bollig, who I thought was a one dimensional player had also worked hard to strengthen his game and become a consistent asset to the team when he is on the ice.

I see a similar work ethic with a player like Nordstrom...who I think will grow into a more permanent spot on the roster next year.....

It's not so much being a Q guy as a few have stated but more being a guy Q trusts on the ice......and as shown he gives young players who work hard a fair chance.
- UnnamedSource

Excellent post, US. Some young players don't make it under Q. Plenty do. Q does have his favorites among the kids - he likes the ones that are good.

Today's article....

Not a 60 min. effort but good enough to outlast Canes 3-2. Leddy and TT facts-On The Blackhawks:Fox Chicago:http://bit.ly/1lZvuA0

On Twitter@AlCimaglia

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 81
20 86 88
29 65 23
52 16 28

Omfg
- mrpaulish

Fixed.

...and this is more like a line-up for next season.

A lot is made about the chances given and lack thereof to young players in the Hawk system. Many of us have a different point of view as to why certain players don't succeed under Q. However when you watch Bollig and Smith work hard, remain consistent, and play like they don't want to let go of their spot on the ice the answer is and will always be right in front of us.

Bollig & Smith, like Krugman and Shaw in the past get better every game. Smith, whom I thought was a bridge player like Morin & Pirri may have found a permanent spot on this year for the next few years. He will be cheap, works hard, and is versatile. Bollig, who I thought was a one dimensional player had also worked hard to strengthen his game and become a consistent asset to the team when he is on the ice.

I see a similar work ethic with a player like Nordstrom...who I think will grow into a more permanent spot on the roster next year.....

It's not so much being a Q guy as a few have stated but more being a guy Q trusts on the ice......and as shown he gives young players who work hard a fair chance.
- UnnamedSource

Q's input on whether a player succeeds is sometimes overstated.

Today's article....

Not a 60 min. effort but good enough to outlast Canes 3-2. Leddy and TT facts-On The Blackhawks:Fox Chicago:http://bit.ly/1lZvuA0

On Twitter@AlCimaglia

Full lineup you have separate Kane and TT....to much the same.


29-19-88
10-86-81
20-65-23
52-16-28

26/12
- UnnamedSource

Agreed on Kane/TT too smurfy if they're together.

Hossa and Kane both play RW so won't me on the same line. Plus you left out Smith.

10-19-88
20-86-81
29-65-23
52-16-28
12, 26
- DarthKane

Hossa can play LW.

My bad on smith .


Still omfg

Fixed.

...and this is more like a line-up for next season.
- EKolb13

Still......


Omfg

Yup. And with a full line up..

10 19 88
20 86 81
29 65 23
52 16 28

Omfg
- mrpaulish


Fixed.

...and this is more like a line-up for next season.
- EKolb13

Fixed your fix