mrpaulish
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Itasca, IL Joined: 01.18.2010
|
|
|
i had to google it, dont' get that commercial up here. - sensarmy_11
Ha |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
i had to google it, dont' get that commercial up here. - sensarmy_11
And aren't you sorry you did? |
|
|
|
And aren't you sorry you did? - StLBravesFan
a little bit, yeah |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
Any GM that pays Bolland $5 mill should be fired. Are you nuts. A walking wounded soldier, that is Bolland. Why even last season he was hurting in the playoffs. Not the same Bolland as the first Cup. Though he had a big moment against Bruins. - jhawk59
I disagree.
When the cap goes up, salaries increase. Sure, $5 million per season for Bolland sounds high at first, but in a couple of seasons it might be viewed as a bargain. |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
Bickell and McNeil for Bourque and Eller. There is no other way. - soad_live
No. |
|
mohel
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 02.08.2013
|
|
|
I disagree.
When the cap goes up, salaries increase. Sure, $5 million per season for Bolland sounds high at first, but in a couple of seasons it might be viewed as a bargain. - EKolb13
I agree completely about the salaries issue, Eli. Many here have not made the adjustment to the new salary structure as the cap increases. Many use the salary of another player signed three years ago as the comparison to a player that has recently signed. This is wrong; the proper comparison is to a player that was signed VERY recently. In fact, for a long contract (over three years) agents and teams will project the market out over the length of the contract and try to get the AAV to a number that will be appropriate in the middle of the deal. Doing otherwise would be malpractice for the agent. |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
rtang415
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Palatine, IL Joined: 02.07.2009
|
|
|
I know this doesn't mean much in the grand scheme of things, but Toledo's head coach stepped down yesterday...
Slow news morning...
http://www.13abc.com/stor...alleye-head-coach-resigns - EKolb13
Judging by their record and where they are in the standings, which is last, I would say he was about ready to get canned anyway. A case of the players tuning him out? |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
Judging by their record and where they are in the standings, which is last, I would say he was about ready to get canned anyway. A case of the players tuning him out? - rtang415
Maybe that's part of it? I don't follow the Walleye too heavily.
I know there was a news story last week that I posted here that stated that Toledo had thought about dumping or changing one or more of it's NHL affiliations after the season ends. The main complaint was that Toledo has had 80 player transactions so far this season and it was believed by the Toledo organization that this was a big part of the problem reflecting their record.
With 80 personnel changes, I would venture to guess that it's tough for the team to have any chemistry for too long.
http://www.toledoblade.co...rt-Walleye-s-success.html |
|
philco28
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Mississauga, ON Joined: 12.06.2011
|
|
|
philco28
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Mississauga, ON Joined: 12.06.2011
|
|
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
He's a lock as a finalist and has a great shot to get his 2nd Norris
- philco28
All of this talk about Keith being a Norris candidate - and I know he has a ton of assists- but:
Aren't the Hawks somewhere in the middle of the league in goals allowed?
Shouldn't a defenseman who plays 35%+ of his teams minutes be downgraded for that performance?
Shouldn't the Norris winner come from a team with a better simplistic defensive record (and I realize that GA is a simplistic and perhaps unfair way of measuring a team's defensive results)? |
|
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 5.13.4.9 Joined: 02.23.2012
|
|
|
@MarkLazerus: #Blackhawks RT "@MaStrozyk: Teuvo Teräväinen, the youngest player in the line-up, will be sporting the C for Jokerit tonight." |
|
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 5.13.4.9 Joined: 02.23.2012
|
|
|
I disagree.
When the cap goes up, salaries increase. Sure, $5 million per season for Bolland sounds high at first, but in a couple of seasons it might be viewed as a bargain. - EKolb13
The same can be said for Bickell at $4 million. |
|
paulr
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: YYZ Joined: 06.26.2011
|
|
|
Judging by their record and where they are in the standings, which is last, I would say he was about ready to get canned anyway. A case of the players tuning him out? - rtang415
You can't necessarily judge the coach of a farm team on wins and losses. A farm team is in place primarily for developing players. |
|
|
|
All of this talk about Keith being a Norris candidate - and I know he has a ton of assists- but:
Aren't the Hawks somewhere in the middle of the league in goals allowed?
Shouldn't a defenseman who plays 35%+ of his teams minutes be downgraded for that performance?
Shouldn't the Norris winner come from a team with a better simplistic defensive record (and I realize that GA is a simplistic and perhaps unfair way of measuring a team's defensive results)? - StLBravesFan
let's be honest here, the norris is about points first, and defense second.
keith is, i believe, 2nd in scoring by d-men (just behind karlsson), but it quite a bit better than him defensively.
he isn't the best shutdown guy in the league, but when you mix offense + defense, he's easily, IMO, the best overall d-man in the league this year.
I would guess the 3-4 finalists would be keith, karlsson, pietrangelo, weber....and I think keith wins it pretty easily (i think karlsson and weber are gonna get killed cuz of their +/-) |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
@MarkLazerus: #Blackhawks RT "@MaStrozyk: Teuvo Teräväinen, the youngest player in the line-up, will be sporting the C for Jokerit tonight." - DarthKane
Interesting. Where's our Finnish correspondent at to shed more light on this story? |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
You can't necessarily judge the coach of a farm team on wins and losses. A farm team is in place primarily for developing players. - paulr
I don't know if that's necessarily true at the "AA" level. If I'm not mistaken, at that level, affiliate teams can only have "x" amount of players they can send to that level.
In a way, it's part development, but it's also about putting a winning team on the ice at the same time. If you want to fill the seats, teams have to win in that league.
EDIT: ECHL teams are allowed twenty players on the active roster. In order to make it work, especially with a team that has two NHL affiliates, I would venture to guess that the ECHL team needs to keep a certain percentage of regular players who have no affiliation with AHL/NHL players, and have to keep a certain percentage of roster spots open for their NHL affiliates.
Toledo currently has 7 players on the roster with ties to Rockford and Chicago, and Cinncinatti is currently housing one "prospect" (I'm using the term loosely). |
|
paulr
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: YYZ Joined: 06.26.2011
|
|
|
All of this talk about Keith being a Norris candidate - and I know he has a ton of assists- but:
Aren't the Hawks somewhere in the middle of the league in goals allowed?
Shouldn't a defenseman who plays 35%+ of his teams minutes be downgraded for that performance?
Shouldn't the Norris winner come from a team with a better simplistic defensive record (and I realize that GA is a simplistic and perhaps unfair way of measuring a team's defensive results)? - StLBravesFan
The Norris trophy seldom goes to the best defensive defenseman, it goes to the defenseman with the highest point total and the defensive stats are sort of factored in. That said a plus 19 for Keith looks awfully good in that regard.
One day I would like to see a new trophy, call it the Bobby Orr trophy for the highest scoring defenseman and give the Norris to the best all round defenseman. |
|
paulr
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: YYZ Joined: 06.26.2011
|
|
|
I don't know if that's necessarily true at the "AA" level. If I'm not mistaken, at that level, affiliate teams can only have "x" amount of players they can send to that level.
In a way, it's part development, but it's also about putting a winning team on the ice at the same time. If you want to fill the seats, teams have to win in that league. - EKolb13
The Toronto Marlies had a very good winning percentage a few years back. But they did it with journeyman veterans who weren't being considered as Leaf prospects. Other than winning what is the point of that? I want to see the Hawk farm teams develop players as they have been rather than focusing on winning. That said if the players are well developed and are a winning team, that is a huge bonus. |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
The Toronto Marlies had a very good winning percentage a few years back. But they did it with journeyman veterans who weren't being considered as Leaf prospects. Other than winning what is the point of that? I want to see the Hawk farm teams develop players as they have been rather than focusing on winning. That said if the players are well developed and are a winning team, that is a huge bonus. - paulr
One of the attributes young players have to learn is how to win - which can only be taught by winning: protecting a one-goal lead with three minutes left, overcoming a one or two goal 3rd period deficit, keeping control of a three-goal second period lead.
It's a delicate balance, but I would think - like in baseball - consistently winning NHL teams have consistently winning farm teams. |
|
the_dough_boy
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 07.01.2012
|
|
|
let's be honest here, the norris is about points first, and defense second.
keith is, i believe, 2nd in scoring by d-men (just behind karlsson), but it quite a bit better than him defensively.
he isn't the best shutdown guy in the league, but when you mix offense + defense, he's easily, IMO, the best overall d-man in the league this year.
I would guess the 3-4 finalists would be keith, karlsson, pietrangelo, weber....and I think keith wins it pretty easily (i think karlsson and weber are gonna get killed cuz of their +/-) - sensarmy_11
Thanks for bringing weber up! wanted to see what you guys thought about the possibility of him being traded is and for what return. Oh, And Zepplin is the best band in history IMO |
|
paulr
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: YYZ Joined: 06.26.2011
|
|
|
One of the attributes young players have to learn is how to win - which can only be taught by winning: protecting a one-goal lead with three minutes left, overcoming a one or two goal 3rd period deficit, keeping control of a three-goal second period lead.
It's a delicate balance, but I would think - like in baseball - consistently winning NHL teams have consistently winning farm teams. - StLBravesFan
I agree 100%, but my point is there is no chance for a team that is there primarily to develop players when other teams are stacking their rosters with older non prospects. |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
I agree 100%, but my point is there is no chance for a team that is there primarily to develop players when other teams are stacking their rosters with older non prospects. - paulr
Yes. |
|
mohel
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 02.08.2013
|
|
|
One of the attributes young players have to learn is how to win - which can only be taught by winning: protecting a one-goal lead with three minutes left, overcoming a one or two goal 3rd period deficit, keeping control of a three-goal second period lead.
It's a delicate balance, but I would think - like in baseball - consistently winning NHL teams have consistently winning farm teams. - StLBravesFan
I understand the learning to win thing. Many of them already have that in the tool belt, as they've generally been the most dominant player on the ice growing up. To me it is far more important to develop the physical AND mental skills (how to think the game) that will help the NHL team (and the player). Sometimes this means that the "prospect" gets put in positions he hasn't yet earned in comparison to the "vet". Let's say Brookbank could be sent down freely, without waiver fears. He'd be the best defenseman on Rockford's back line, clearly a better defender than Clendenning at this point. But they might decide (and should, imo) to play Clendenning and Dahlstrombergman against the other team's top line to try to get them ready for the bigs. I would think those two would develop better playing the other teams' best line. And to me, that is more important than the learning how to win thing - the Hawks have that in their group in spades and the new guys will catch on there. |
|