Amazing. No he did you waste of skin. He retired the season he was traded, after winning the cup.

Seems you watch a lot of hockey eh
- Bieksa#3

he was traded during the 1999/2000 season. he retired after the avs won the cup in 2001.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...tats/pdisplay.php?pid=520

why so mad bro?

You can cling to those all you want. It's a Stanley Cup or nothing to brag about. Your hollow Northwest division titles may as well be a participation ribbon, that division was a joke. They earned their President's trophy, and poop all over it with that embarrassing home loss in game 7 to the Bruins. Instead of typing Division titles and President's trophies vs. Nothing you should have typed Division titles and President's trophies = Nothing, because that's just the truth of the matter.
- BetterCallSaul

Didn't the Leafs recently lose a game 7 to the Bruins?

as an example, your phase could be worded thus in future:

"the table in the laboratory is flame mentally challenged"
- MetroidPrime

No, I think that is too specific as well. We must embrace people-first language (or table first) such as this.....

"The differently abled table is unstable when able."

(Ok, seriously, I need some for that one) Can A Brother get a

Didn't the Leafs recently lose a game 7 to the Bruins?

- hillbillydeluxe

Yes, and it was embarrassing.

Actually, the leaf guy is correct. Bourque was traded to the Av's and played 14 regular season games with them and the playoffs. Then the following year he played 80 games and the playoffs, won the CUp and retired.
- woopstash

Just checked

Has my mind gotten that bad with age

You can cling to those all you want. It's a Stanley Cup or nothing to brag about. Your hollow Northwest division titles may as well be a participation ribbon, that division was a joke. They earned their President's trophy, and poop all over it with that embarrassing home loss in game 7 to the Bruins. Instead of typing Division titles and President's trophies vs. Nothing you should have typed Division titles and President's trophies = Nothing, because that's just the truth of the matter.
- BetterCallSaul

Yet, your organization celebrates that last time team won a Stanley Cup 50 years ago with a pre-game ceremony on national television when they league was practically the same size as what divisions are now

That would essentially be the same if we were to have a pre-game ceremony commemorating 50th anniversary of a Northwest Division title; no one cares. The only reason you guys have a history of winning the Stanley Cup is because it was the only thing that was award HALF A CENTURY ago. You guys should be embarrassed, not over here trolling about it.

Let's face facts, the Leafs wouldn't even have a conference playoff title if we were comparing apples to apples here between the same era of the Leafs and Canucks. The Leafs haven't been past the 3rd round in the expansion era; the Canucks have been to the SCF 3 times in the same era. We don't have pre-game ceremonies every Saturday night on national television bragging about it.

Just checked

Has my mind gotten that bad with age
- Bieksa#3

No more Sunday morning benders for you.

he was traded during the 1999/2000 season. he retired after the avs won the cup in 2001.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...tats/pdisplay.php?pid=520

why so mad bro?
- MetroidPrime

So what do you cite as a reason for the Leafs not being able to win it all? There's more than 5 other teams?
- woopstash

From '68 until '91, the answer is painfully simple:

Harold Ballard.

Just checked

Has my mind gotten that bad with age
- Bieksa#3

No B, your fine. We are all out of practice dealing with Leaf trolls as they have been afraid to show their heads for so long.

It will pass.

From '68 until '91, the answer is painfully simple:

Harold Ballard.
- Atomic Wedgie

Has it been better under MLSE

Yeti gave me authority
- Bieksa#3

That would be like the Government of Greece offering personal loans and mortgages...

Agreed.

Hey Lumlums... long time no see!
- Beatle_john

Hey man, whats up?

Just checked

Has my mind gotten that bad with age
- Bieksa#3

Don't worry, at least you remember watching Wendell Clark, Doug Gilmour, Mats Sundin & Cujo hoist the cup for the leafs right?

Has it been better under MLSE
- Bieksa#3

Yes.

Ballard is dead

From '68 until '91, the answer is painfully simple:

Harold Ballard.
- Atomic Wedgie

A cold wind just blew open my front door.

That is the name that should not be spoken.

Just checked

Has my mind gotten that bad with age
- Bieksa#3

Apparently your apologies are just as bad.

Yet, your organization celebrates that last time team won a Stanley Cup 50 years ago with a pre-game ceremony on national television when they league was practically the same size as what divisions are now

That would essentially be the same if we were to have a pre-game ceremony commemorating 50th anniversary of a Northwest Division title; no one cares. The only reason you guys have a history of winning the Stanley Cup is because it was the only thing that was award HALF A CENTURY ago. You guys should be embarrassed, not over here trolling about it.

Let's face facts, the Leafs wouldn't even have a conference playoff title if we were comparing apples to apples here between the same era of the Leafs and Canucks. The Leafs haven't been past the 3rd round in the expansion era; the Canucks have been to the SCF 3 times in the same era. We don't have pre-game ceremonies every Saturday night on national television bragging about it.
- Chest Rockwell

Yes, because those are the guys who pioneered the game, played for the love of the sport, and allowed for the foundation of the league as we know it

Yes, because those are the guys who pioneered the game, played for the love of the sport, and allowed for the foundation of the league as we know it
- lumlums

In honour of them:

Hey man, whats up?
- lumlums

Believe it or not.... just entering the final year of my Masters. (You would not know it from my sentence structure and spelling here on HB but I am 8 months away from a Masters of Education in Educational Practice.

Yet, your organization celebrates that last time team won a Stanley Cup 50 years ago with a pre-game ceremony on national television when they league was practically the same size as what divisions are now

That would essentially be the same if we were to have a pre-game ceremony commemorating 50th anniversary of a Northwest Division title; no one cares. The only reason you guys have a history of winning the Stanley Cup is because it was the only thing that was award HALF A CENTURY ago. You guys should be embarrassed, not over here trolling about it.

Let's face facts, the Leafs wouldn't even have a conference playoff title if we were comparing apples to apples here between the same era of the Leafs and Canucks. The Leafs haven't been past the 3rd round in the expansion era; the Canucks have been to the SCF 3 times in the same era. We don't have pre-game ceremonies every Saturday night on national television bragging about it.
- Chest Rockwell

You can throw a bone to those players out of respect, but most Leaf fans I know don't care for those pregame ceremonies.

If we're facing facts, then let's face the one that says both of out teams have failed to capture a championship in over 40 years. At the end of the day, that's all that matters.

Don't worry, at least you remember watching Wendell Clark, Doug Gilmour, Mats Sundin & Cujo hoist the cup for the leafs right?
- I-own_da-Northwest

Gotta love Doug Gilmour.

The rest are nobody's.

Clark is Tortos Linden. A nice well above average player who was beloved by the organizations fans. But wasnt a star

Has it been better under MLSE
- Bieksa#3

Quite a bit better.

Subtract the JFJ years, and it hasn't been half bad.

In honour of them:

- woopstash

- Bieksa#3

This is a funny one