Since we keep track of time in terms of Before Christ Era and After Death of Christ Era, why shouldn't our new year start on Christmas or on the possible day of year Christ died? Oh, well, Happy Jesus' birthday everyone!
Location: Unpopular opinion (i think): The best Die Hard movie is the 4th one- Live free or Die Hard -jdfitz7, NY Joined: 10.07.2010
Dec 25 @ 3:22 PM ET
Since we keep track of time in terms of Before Christ Era and After Death of Christ Era, why shouldn't our new year start on Christmas or on the possible day of year Christ died? Oh, well, Happy Jesus' birthday everyone! - sskkoo1
Because the Gregorian calendar is based on the Julian calendar which was implemented in 45 BC, well before Christ.
Also, Jesus wasn't born on December 25th either, so it doesn't make much of a difference.
Since we keep track of time in terms of Before Christ Era and After Death of Christ Era, why shouldn't our new year start on Christmas or on the possible day of year Christ died? Oh, well, Happy Jesus' birthday everyone! - sskkoo1
The Jesus birth after party was so lit that it took the calendar guy 7 days to recover and complete the calendar.
Being the egomaniac with an inferiority complex, he declared December 31st the final day of the year. Im Russ Brandon and I approve this story.
Location: Unpopular opinion (i think): The best Die Hard movie is the 4th one- Live free or Die Hard -jdfitz7, NY Joined: 10.07.2010
Dec 25 @ 4:54 PM ET
The Jesus birth after party was so lit that it took the calendar guy 7 days to recover and complete the calendar.
Being the egomaniac with an inferiority complex, he declared December 31st the final day of the year. Im Russ Brandon and I approve this story. - washedup20
I read that as "The Jesus after birth party..." puts a whole new spin on "the blood of Christ".
Location: Unpopular opinion (i think): The best Die Hard movie is the 4th one- Live free or Die Hard -jdfitz7, NY Joined: 10.07.2010
Dec 25 @ 5:21 PM ET
The Chargers and Titans have to lose with a Bills win for the Bills to get in.
How does that week when McDermott lost his (frank)ing mind look now?
Edit: He better stand up and take the heat for that absolutely moronical decision at the end of season presser. And not give the old "Peterman gave us the best chance to win" bullpoop. I'm already close to being done with his utterly conservative decisions, 4th and 1 inside opponents territory? Punt. 4th and 15 when you're down fairly late in the game? Screen pass. GTFO with that bullpoop.
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
Dec 25 @ 7:21 PM ET
Projecting that the Bills were going to win that game with Tyrod and moron AC Dennison is a rather large assumption in my opinion.
Time to move past it.
Location: You are all Weirdos, NY Joined: 06.06.2012
Dec 25 @ 7:29 PM ET
Projecting that the Bills were going to win that game with Tyrod and moron AC Dennison is a rather large assumption in my opinion.
Time to move past it. - IonSabres
It's not a matter of projecting the Bills to win. Everyone knows they'd need a miracle to beat the Patriots. The problem lies in the fact that the Patriots get to play with a different set of rules than the rest of the league, and this have been evident since the early 2000s. The Bills only had about a 10% chance of winning that game and with the officials spotting the Pats a good 10 points it took them down to a 1% chance.
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
Dec 25 @ 9:35 PM ET
It's not a matter of projecting the Bills to win. Everyone knows they'd need a miracle to beat the Patriots. The problem lies in the fact that the Patriots get to play with a different set of rules than the rest of the league, and this have been evident since the early 2000s. The Bills only had about a 10% chance of winning that game and with the officials spotting the Pats a good 10 points it took them down to a 1% chance. - sskkoo1
I’m talking about the projection you seem to mak3 that the Bills would have won against LAC, the game McDermott started Peterman
Location: You are all Weirdos, NY Joined: 06.06.2012
Dec 25 @ 9:46 PM ET
I’m talking about the projection you seem to mak3 that the Bills would have won against LAC, the game McDermott started Peterman - IonSabres
Wait. What? I never stated the Bills would win any game. I've only stated that it's B.S. how the league is only clear and obvious in it's love affair with Boston.
Wait. What? I never stated the Bills would win any game. I've only stated that it's B.S. how the league is only clear and obvious in it's love affair with Boston. - sskkoo1
Location: We are in 30th place. It's 2017 , NY Joined: 02.12.2012
Dec 25 @ 10:03 PM ET
Projecting that the Bills were going to win that game with Tyrod and moron AC Dennison is a rather large assumption in my opinion.
Time to move past it. - IonSabres
Location: I said that months ago, keep up!, FL Joined: 03.10.2013
Dec 25 @ 10:13 PM ET
Wait. What? I never stated the Bills would win any game. I've only stated that it's B.S. how the league is only clear and obvious in it's love affair with Boston. - sskkoo1
My bad, I lost track of who said what.
My original response was towards Bandits post in which he seems to project a win vs LAC when he went off on McDermott.
Then you replied to my response about counting on that to be a win as a large assumption...thought it was Bandit not you.... my bad.
I do agree with you that The Pats get every benefit of the doubt, it can not any longer be considered coincidence. They must have pictures of several high placed league officials
