Todd Cordell: Kinkaid shines as Devils bounce-back with win over Rangers

nice win

I hope the Devils don't revert back to last year's barely get 20 shots on net team. They need to find ways to get looks and shots on net like the first 3 games

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?

Other then that we're top of the conference, yes it's early, and don't have much to be unhappy about.

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?
- Bobd62

A win is a win. Stay salty

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?
- Bobd62

Bounce back win = bounce back from losing the night before.

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?
- Bobd62

1-5.

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?
- Bobd62

Lol love how this guy is complaining about devils fans coming onto the Rangers thread and talking poop (they really aren't), but then comes on here and says something dumb.

Not salty at all not answering the question pretty much sums it up like I said enjoy it while it lasts

Lol love how this guy is complaining about devils fans coming onto the Rangers thread and talking poop (they really aren't), but then comes on here and says something dumb.
- NJDevsFan27

Lmao are you serious butch? Go back to your comic books.

1-5.
- smellmyfinger

And that explains what?

And that explains what?
- Bobd62

One, and, Five.

Okay thanks for the insight great job!

Lmao are you serious butch? Go back to your comic books.
- Bobd62

This might actually be insulting if it made any sense whatsoever... Kind of like your first attempt with the "bounce back win" thing, another big swing and miss. keep trying.

Swing and miss? nice!

:one of you guys need to explain how being dominated for two periods translates into a bounce back win?
- Bobd62

Devils didn’t show up until the 2nd period and played with a short bench 9 forwards for the rest of the game and they kind of took their foot off the gas after scoring a minute into the 3rd period wouldn’t say they got dominated besides the first period yes the rangers had 14 shots in the 3rd but many of them were not quality chances until the end when they pulled the goalie

And that explains what?
- Bobd62

It explains why you are here on this thread.

You make the victory even sweeter, keep it up, we are thirsty for your tears!

This is what I mean... (took their foot off the gas?) look you won the game but I think it had more to do with being dominated than taking their foot off the gas.how about you didn’t win the game the rangers lost it ?

It explains why you are here on this thread.

You make the victory even sweeter, keep it up, we are thirsty for your tears!


- TRDevil

You can’t be this stupid..........oh wait

This is what I mean... (took their foot off the gas?) look you won the game but I think it had more to do with being dominated than taking their foot off the gas.how about you didn’t win the game the rangers lost it ?
- Bobd62

Six games in I’ll talk to you again after twenty we will see what’s up then. And please no predictions

You can’t be this stupid..........oh wait
- Bobd62

YASSS MORE TEARS PLEASE

- TRDevil

Your avatar says it all Bluto

I love messin with you aholes almost as much fun as the flyer thread