Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Paul Berthelot: Post Battle ECQF Game #1 – Jackets can’t capitalize on strong first period
Author Message
Paul Berthelot
Columbus Blue Jackets
Location: Peterborough, ON
Joined: 07.14.2015

Apr 13 @ 12:07 PM ET
Paul Berthelot: Post Battle ECQF Game #1 – Jackets can’t capitalize on strong first period Blue Jackets lose Game 1 3-1.
jkumpire
Location:
Joined: 03.16.2009

Apr 13 @ 12:36 PM ET
Didn't see a second of the game due to work, but it sounds like another great effort wasted just like the last month of the season. I trust the coaching staff to have the right players on the ice, but maybe the wrong third pair was out there for two of the three or three of the three goals they scored.

It's one game, but they need to get off the schnide offensively.
holeinone
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: United States, PA
Joined: 07.03.2007

Apr 13 @ 12:44 PM ET
Time for the BOO Jackets to step up to the big time. They are not playing the JV squad
Alexzanki
Columbus Blue Jackets
Location: Montreal, QC
Joined: 06.03.2008

Apr 13 @ 1:21 PM ET
As stated in ek's blogg , this was all show and no bite , once again, and it's frustrating.

If last night was any indication, then it's over before it started , valiant effort, but I cringe at the idea they cannot beat Pittsburgh's B team.
Shakers
Columbus Blue Jackets
Joined: 03.22.2017

Apr 13 @ 1:39 PM ET
Other than the 3 minutes or so of the 2nd period I thought it was a good effort. They just needed to capitalize on some of the early scoring opportunities and it could have been a different outcome. And please Torts, don't play that 3rd D pair again, that was brutal. Oh, and PIT fans apparently think CHECKING is a penality.
GO JACKETS!
Alexzanki
Columbus Blue Jackets
Location: Montreal, QC
Joined: 06.03.2008

Apr 13 @ 2:07 PM ET
Other than the 3 minutes or so of the 2nd period I thought it was a good effort. They just needed to capitalize on some of the early scoring opportunities and it could have been a different outcome. And please Torts, don't play that 3rd D pair again, that was brutal. Oh, and PIT fans apparently think CHECKING is a penality.
GO JACKETS!

- Shakers

Agreed , Torts gambled and lost....
Rinosaur
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Somewhere, NJ
Joined: 01.21.2016

Apr 13 @ 4:16 PM ET
As stated in ek's blogg , this was all show and no bite , once again, and it's frustrating.

If last night was any indication, then it's over before it started , valiant effort, but I cringe at the idea they cannot beat Pittsburgh's B team.

- Alexzanki


The series is about to get better for you as it looks like you'll see more of MAF. He's actually great at home, but TERRIBLE on the road.

Losing Letang drastically hurts the Pens' chances of going deep, but I wouldn't call this their B Team.
Rinosaur
Pittsburgh Penguins
Location: Somewhere, NJ
Joined: 01.21.2016

Apr 13 @ 4:17 PM ET
Other than the 3 minutes or so of the 2nd period I thought it was a good effort. They just needed to capitalize on some of the early scoring opportunities and it could have been a different outcome. And please Torts, don't play that 3rd D pair again, that was brutal. Oh, and PIT fans apparently think CHECKING is a penality.
GO JACKETS!

- Shakers


You sound like a Flyers fan.