Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Does Toronto Have Interest In Vancouver Veterans? Leafs Vs Canucks
Author Message
Mike Augello
Commissioner
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Buffalo, NY
Joined: 06.25.2006

Feb 8 @ 3:10 PM ET
Mike Augello: Does Toronto Have Interest In Vancouver Veterans? Leafs Vs Canucks
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON
Joined: 09.12.2007

Feb 8 @ 3:10 PM ET
Mike Augello: Does Toronto Have Interest In Vancouver Veterans? Leafs Vs Canucks
- mikeinbuffalo


FIRST




TO SAY NO.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:10 PM ET
6-1 Leafs....
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:12 PM ET

Does Toronto Have Interest In Vancouver Veterans?.


....FK no Mike...
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 8 @ 3:12 PM ET
Can't see to many of Vancouver guys waiving to go to Toronto. Their already playing for a we a ea going nowhere. Might as well get to stay in a beautiful city
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:13 PM ET
Can't see to many of Vancouver guys waiving to go to Toronto. Their already playing for a we a ea going nowhere. Might as well get to stay in a beautiful city
- Bieksa#3



Good...Dont want the diving losers....
Aaron85
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.20.2013

Feb 8 @ 3:13 PM ET
Honest question, do they have any defensemen that could be another gleason type?
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 8 @ 3:13 PM ET
6-1 Leafs....
- Fruitcakenipple

Can't see us allowing 6 goals to a fellow ahl team but I'm fully expecting a toronto wink
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON
Joined: 09.12.2007

Feb 8 @ 3:13 PM ET
Does Toronto Have Interest In Vancouver Veterans?.


....FK no Mike...

- Fruitcakenipple


I would take Bieska for Holland and Gunnar. That's about it.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:13 PM ET
Honest question, do they have any defensemen that could be another gleason type?
- Aaron85



Nope
Mike Augello
Commissioner
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Buffalo, NY
Joined: 06.25.2006

Feb 8 @ 3:14 PM ET
Can't see to many of Vancouver guys waiving to go to Toronto. Their already playing for a we a ea going nowhere. Might as well get to stay in a beautiful city
- Bieksa#3


They can crash and burn with the Canucks or go elsewhere and possibly succeed.

Wait.......Vancouver........burn.....hmmm.
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:14 PM ET
I would take Bieska for Holland and Gunnar. That's about it.
- systemtool



True forgot about him....The only one i would want on the leafs...
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:14 PM ET
They can crash and burn with the Canucks or go elsewhere and possibly succeed.

Wait.......Vancouver........burn.....hmmm.

- mikeinbuffalo


systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON
Joined: 09.12.2007

Feb 8 @ 3:15 PM ET
They can crash and burn with the Canucks or go elsewhere and possibly succeed.

Wait.......Vancouver........burn.....hmmm.

- mikeinbuffalo



Ooooh, I love you Mikey!

Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:16 PM ET
Jesus...Gonna have to cheer for the B's....
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 8 @ 3:16 PM ET
Honest question, do they have any defensemen that could be another gleason type?
- Aaron85

Um Vancouver has 5 defenseman that are easily in leafs top 4. Hamhuis is defense 1st and day and night better then any of the leafs d men. Doubt he'd wanna move east and price would be very steep as well
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:17 PM ET
Um Vancouver has 5 defenseman that are easily in leafs top 4. Hamhuis is defense 1st and day and night better then any of the leafs d men. Doubt he'd wanna move east and price would be very steep as well
- Bieksa#3



Ya,ya we know....top 4 with every team in the league...
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 8 @ 3:17 PM ET
They can crash and burn with the Canucks or go elsewhere and possibly succeed.

Wait.......Vancouver........burn.....hmmm.

- mikeinbuffalo

Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 8 @ 3:17 PM ET
I would take Bieska for Holland and Gunnar. That's about it.
- systemtool

Alright, we'll take Kessel and JVR for Setisto
Fruitcakenipple
Location: NF
Joined: 01.12.2011

Feb 8 @ 3:17 PM ET

- Nucker101


Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 8 @ 3:18 PM ET
Ya,ya we know....top 4 with every team in the league...
- Fruitcakenipple

Not sure about every team, but close. Can't (frank)ing score to save their lives though
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 8 @ 3:18 PM ET
Ya,ya we know....top 4 with every team in the league...
- Fruitcakenipple

Homer comments aside, I'd be pretty surprised if Hamhuis/Edler/Bieksa/Tanev/Garrison would not be top 4 in ice time with the Leafs this year. The same way Canucks fans would be drooling over a guy like JVR if he was in our lineup.
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON
Joined: 09.12.2007

Feb 8 @ 3:19 PM ET
Alright, we'll take Kessel and JVR for Setisto
- Bieksa#3


I bet you would.
cdjaakkola
Location: PEI
Joined: 02.08.2013

Feb 8 @ 3:19 PM ET


GO LEAFS GO
Leafs43
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.16.2010

Feb 8 @ 3:20 PM ET
Homer comments aside, I'd be pretty surprised if Hamhuis/Edler/Bieksa/Tanev/Garrison would not be top 4 in ice time with the Leafs this year. The same way Canucks fans would be drooling over a guy like JVR if he was in our lineup.
- Nucker101


Probably right.

Our defense is not an area of strength by any means.

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66  Next