Eklund: Kings and Oilers Talking Big Deal- (e4)

hmmm first?

Big Deal? If it's Gagner it's not a "big deal".

Its gotta be for Yakupov..cant see em trading away anything else.

So is the e4 to represent that four people have said there "might" be a move or does it mean that four people said there will be a move?

Its gotta be for Yakupov..cant see em trading away anything else.
- nascarguy

forgot about gagne, but, if its a big deal.. it wouldn't be for just gagne.. yak is part of this if its true..IF

It's not surprising Vanek doesn't want to play for a dysfunctional organization, starting with a meddling owner, a GM who's yet to prove anything other than he can draft first overall fairly well and a coach who shouldn't be coaching in the NHL.

Yak and Ebs for Doughty?

Eklund: Kings and Oilers Talking Big Deal- (e4)
- Eklund

So, Cammy to the Kings then?

It's not surprising Vanek doesn't want to play for a dysfunctional organization, starting with a meddling owner, a GM who's yet to prove anything other than he can draft first overall fairly well and a coach who shouldn't be coaching in the NHL.
- LeftCoaster

When did he say he wouldn't play for Vancouver???

So, Cammy to the Kings then?
- whipper334

Burke has to bash Cammy's skills and work ethic first!

It's not surprising Vanek doesn't want to play for a dysfunctional organization, starting with a meddling owner, a GM who's yet to prove anything other than he can draft first overall fairly well and a coach who shouldn't be coaching in the NHL.
- LeftCoaster

I guess Snow came on board after they drafted DiPietro?

What a disaster that Moulson/Vanek trade is turning out to be for them. It's only funny because 95% of us saw it coming.

LA desperately needs scoring. Edmonton needs a long term solution to the ongoing problems on their back end. LA has some very nice pieces.....can they put enough in a package for a guy like Eberle?

Don't think LA has any interest in Yakupov. They need a guy who can make a difference this year and in the playoffs.

I'll bring up a trade proposal that had some heat yesterday:
Sam Gagner + 2015 1st = Mike Richards.

I find it hard to believe they would trade Eberle or Yakupov, who I find would be the most likely to be traded amongst the kids, to a Western Conference team. Eberle is already known to be good, and Yak will score plenty of goals in his career, so keeping them within the division is a death sentence for the Oilers, you know how well ex-Oilers ply against us.

When did he say he wouldn't play for Vancouver???
- stuckey

touchè

Big Deal? If it's Gagner it's not a "big deal".
- LeftCoaster

Agreed.

It's just a deal.

When did he say he wouldn't play for Vancouver???
- stuckey

I guess Snow came on board after they drafted DiPietro?

What a disaster that Moulson/Vanek trade is turning out to be for them. It's only funny because 95% of us saw it coming.
- 1979AD

I believe RD was none other than, Mike Milbury?

I'll bring up a trade proposal that had some heat yesterday:
Sam Gagner + 2015 1st = Mike Richards.
- ChetManly

No thanks.

All that does is make us worse at C when we need a LW.

I believe RD was none other than, Mike Milbury?
- LeftCoaster

What an ass-clown! I hate that guy the most out of everyone on tv. and I can't stand Nick Kypreos or Glenn Healey/Kelly Hrudy.

When did he say he wouldn't play for Vancouver???
- stuckey

XxNYIxX

So we can cross off a deal between EDM and LA then....

Likely a deal between CAL and ANA then...

I believe RD was none other than, Mike Milbury?
- LeftCoaster

It's been a succession of fools. I'd be meddling too if I was Wang.

No thanks.
- LAownsALL

Do you mind providing additional information as to why you don't like it? I figured the proposal would provide some decent debate.