Colin Dambrauskas: Which Canadian Team Has Been The Most Successful - Finale - SENS vs CANUCKS

Ya, Canucks... Those Sedin twins have helped make that franchise so great lately...

You should do a blog about the Canadian teams and the franchise MVP over the last twenty years. Or a player at each position or maybe one forward, one defenceman and one goalie that acheived greatness in that teams uniform...

Ya, Canucks... Those Sedin twins have helped make that franchise so great lately...

You should do a blog about the Canadian teams and the franchise MVP over the last twenty years. Or a player at each position or maybe one forward, one defenceman and one goalie that acheived greatness in that teams uniform...
- riceroni

A little better than the Senators have done

I just want a (frank)ing Stanley Cup!

I just want a (frank)ing Stanley Cup!
- Nucker101

Nah this is better..... Congrats on not choking

Think the Sens lost this game, but whatever.

Think the Sens lost this game, but whatever.
- Gord_Wilson_2.0

That's disgusting.. in a good way. The only Sen that I don't want to pummel into a concrete floor.

I just want a (frank)ing Stanley Cup!
- Nucker101

Agreed, I would trade our best overall record to MTL for their Cup win in 93...

Colin Dambrauskas: Which Canadian Team Has Been The Most Successful - Finale - SENS vs CANUCKS
- Colin Dambrauskas

Considering Burke built the Canucks....I think the Leafs are the most successful.

Considering Burke built the Canucks....I think the Leafs are the most successful.
- stormey

You dont know how tempted I was to add in the "most profitable" criteria to the analysis....but that would skew the results considerably lol

Agreed, I would trade our best overall record to MTL for their Cup win in 93...
- Sirfunkyton

Not sure the owners would feel the same way

Mind you...

1) Toronto Maple Leafs $521 million

2) New York Rangers $507 million

3) Montreal Canadiens $445 million

4) Detroit Red Wings $336 million

5) Boston Bruins $325 million

6) Chicago Blackhawks $306 million

7) Vancouver Canucks $300 million

I just want a (frank)ing Stanley Cup!
- Nucker101

i just want playoffs!

i just want playoffs!
- Leaffan8113

Ill go even lower.....I just want 5 o'clock!!

Ah, the great debate as to which team that's never won a goddamned thing is more successful.

Not sure the owners would feel the same way


3) Montreal Canadiens $445 million


7) Vancouver Canucks $300 million
- Colin Dambrauskas

Really? 'Cause I am.

Ill go even lower.....I just want 5 o'clock!!
- Colin Dambrauskas

Ah, the great debate as to which team that's never won a goddamned thing is more successful.
- oniremosewa

Ah, the old argument that any team who dosnt win a cup has done nothing.

Montreal winning a cup 20 years ago dosnt make them successful over a 20 year period. It makes them the most successful, 20 years ago.

Ah, the old argument that any team who dosnt win a cup has done nothing.

Montreal winning a cup 20 years ago dosnt make them successful over a 20 year period. It makes them the most successful, 20 years ago.
- Colin Dambrauskas

Colin, have you thought about a team by team player comparison?
Iggy - Hall Kessel - Sedin...

Really? 'Cause I am.
- oniremosewa

Total population BC: 4,400,057

Total population Quebec: 7,903,001

Just saying...only "french" Canadian team, surely has a lot to do with it.

Colin, have you thought about a team by team player comparison?
Iggy - Hall Kessel - Sedin...
- geta02it

it was brought up a earlier, and couldnt break it down into a blog....best you could do is compare each teams top 6 players offensively and defensively....but what does this give you?

it was brought up a earlier, and couldnt break it down into a blog....best you could do is compare each teams top 6 players offensively and defensively....but what does this give you?
- Colin Dambrauskas

Significant hits... would be good for the banter. Honestly, it would be interesting to see what constitutes each teams "top-player". Points doesn't always = the top player...

Significant hits... would be good for the banter. Honestly, it would be interesting to see what constitutes each teams "top-player". Points doesn't always = the top player...
- geta02it

haha, I feel that would be a repetition of "cup is only measurement of success" type of debates

Ill consider it for next week if nothing else develops...with nothing but CBA talks, there isnt much NHL news to write about

haha, I feel that would be a repetition of "cup is only measurement of success" type of debates

Ill consider it for next week if nothing else develops...with nothing but CBA talks, there isnt much NHL news to write about
- Colin Dambrauskas

Sorry Colin, but am I missing something.

You said that Canucks have 1 Conference (10-11), 2 President (10-11, 11-12). How can you have 1 Con title and 2 PTs? Should it not be 2 and 2?

Sorry Colin, but am I missing something.

You said that Canucks have 1 Conference (10-11), 2 President (10-11, 11-12). How can you have 1 Con title and 2 PTs? Should it not be 2 and 2?
- bloatedmosquito

Winning the 3rd round would be the conference. Hence when we beat SJ to go to the finals

Sorry Colin, but am I missing something.

You said that Canucks have 1 Conference (10-11), 2 President (10-11, 11-12). How can you have 1 Con title and 2 PTs? Should it not be 2 and 2?
- bloatedmosquito

It should be two and two but not why you think. Colin forgot the '94 conference title. Anyway... screw it, we won!

*Burns car*