Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: John Jaeckel: Rumor And Non-Rumor
Author Message
CBHawks88
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Pallie
Joined: 07.05.2012

Jul 9 @ 6:45 PM ET
What is up with all the chatter about Kyle Beach lately? I thought the "Bust" label was already firmly planted on his forehead
- CBHawks88




That's what I thought as well. Who has been talking about Beach???

- nelli312


No one important. I just have been seeing his name thrown around more often recently I almost forgot we wasted a first on him
Dieselhead
Location: CA
Joined: 11.01.2011

Jul 9 @ 6:45 PM ET


Can we have a Luongo free day, or am I going to have to post this as a response to EVERY Luongo post?

- EKolb13


You could plug "trade Frolic" in there as well. That idea has been beaten like a dead horse on this board for 6 weeks now, and nobody wants to accept the fact that were stuck with him for next season.
Dieselhead
Location: CA
Joined: 11.01.2011

Jul 9 @ 6:46 PM ET
No one important. I just have been seeing his name thrown around more often recently I almost forgot we wasted a first on him
- CBHawks88


Yep, and we passed on Tyler Myers in that round.
Al
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: , IL
Joined: 08.11.2006

Jul 9 @ 6:48 PM ET
Hockeyy Insiderr ‏@HockeyyInsiderr
I can confirm that Kane's name has been mentioned several times in these discussions. But ‪#BlackHawks‬ price way 2high for ‪#Habs‬ right now.

Kane appears to be off the table.

Hearing among names discussed going to ‪#BlackHawks‬ Bourque/Weber/Kristo. Also picks being discussed. Nothing imminent as of right now. ‪#Habs‬

Don't like the names, except Weber.

- scorerstouch


If Bergevin can get Bowman to take Rene Bourque back in a trade...The GM of the Year Award should go to him immediately.

On Twitter@AlCimaglia
To mention someone is on the table one day and off the next is a good way of never being wrong...
LA_Kings6720
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Kings fan since '96 ticket holder since '98 Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.12.2010

Jul 9 @ 6:51 PM ET
???? Not good enough, Pri$ey.
- djd

Want to give Bernier a shot??

.....This was in response to you saying Crawford/Emery not good enough
ArlingtonRob
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: 230 years was a good run, IL
Joined: 01.20.2012

Jul 9 @ 6:51 PM ET
You could plug "trade Frolic" in there as well. That idea has been beaten like a dead horse on this board for 6 weeks now, and nobody wants to accept the fact that were stuck with him for next season.
- Dieselhead


frol·ic n.

1. Gaiety; merriment: fun and frolic.
2. A gay, carefree time.
3. A playful antic.
intr.v. frol·icked, frol·ick·ing, frol·ics
1. To behave playfully and uninhibitedly; romp.
2. To engage in merrymaking, joking, or teasing.

Frolik n.

1. Forward, professional hockey player, awful shooting percentage, overpaid, expendable.
HawksHype
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.08.2011

Jul 9 @ 6:52 PM ET
I've been waiting all day at work to write on here. I know you guys have moved off this issue to guns and *cough* luongo *cough* but Kane should not be traded or thought about trading, unless a deal blows you away. This deal listed is not enough for me. These teams need to make us an offer we can't refuse, and reiterate the trade by calling Bowman and saying, "Here's an offer you can't refuse" in the godfather voice. We would be trading our 1RW/2C and 3D for a 2C and 3D. Where does this make sense?! Why would we possibly trade not only a top 6, but a top 3 player for that? In my opinion, we get worse. Kane put up about 60 points while playing in a position he was not familiar with. Kane is a top wing and paired with Toews is awesome to watch. I think we need to trade for a 2C without trading a top 6 or hand it to Kruger. Kane needs to move back over to RW alongside Toews. Pairing Hossa and Toews with Kruger can really help him develop well.

Stalberg-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Kruger-Hossa

Just my opinion, but I'm leaving my view of Kane off the ice out of this. Kane gets along with his teammates and is not a clubhouse cancer, and we want to trade him? Yet bringing in E. Kane is a great idea.

Sorry for my little rant here, I've had about 9 hours today to think this over and it was a crappy work day. Oh well, beer time.
kwolf68
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Mt. Lebanon, PA
Joined: 12.18.2010

Jul 9 @ 6:53 PM ET
frol·ic n.

1. Gaiety; merriment: fun and frolic.
2. A gay, carefree time.
3. A playful antic.
intr.v. frol·icked, frol·ick·ing, frol·ics
1. To behave playfully and uninhibitedly; romp.
2. To engage in merrymaking, joking, or teasing.

Frolik n.

1. Forward, professional hockey player, awful shooting percentage, overpaid, expendable.

- ArlingtonRob


Sundevil
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 04.24.2012

Jul 9 @ 6:54 PM ET
No one important. I just have been seeing his name thrown around more often recently I almost forgot we wasted a first on him
- CBHawks88


I forgot about Beach. I will be sure to add him on everyone of my ridiculous trade suggestions from now on.
moylander
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 06.14.2011

Jul 9 @ 6:54 PM ET
frol·ic n.

1. Gaiety; merriment: fun and frolic.
2. A gay, carefree time.
3. A playful antic.
intr.v. frol·icked, frol·ick·ing, frol·ics
1. To behave playfully and uninhibitedly; romp.
2. To engage in merrymaking, joking, or teasing.

Frolik n.

1. Forward, professional hockey player, awful shooting percentage, overpaid, expendable.

- ArlingtonRob



ArlingtonRob
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: 230 years was a good run, IL
Joined: 01.20.2012

Jul 9 @ 6:55 PM ET
I've been waiting all day at work to write on here. I know you guys have moved off this issue to guns and *cough* luongo *cough* but Kane should not be traded or thought about trading, unless a deal blows you away. This deal listed is not enough for me. These teams need to make us an offer we can't refuse, and reiterate the trade by calling Bowman and saying, "Here's an offer you can't refuse" in the godfather voice. We would be trading our 1RW/2C and 3D for a 2C and 3D. Where does this make sense?! Why would we possibly trade not only a top 6, but a top 3 player for that? In my opinion, we get worse. Kane put up about 60 points while playing in a position he was not familiar with. Kane is a top wing and paired with Toews is awesome to watch. I think we need to trade for a 2C without trading a top 6 or hand it to Kruger. Kane needs to move back over to RW alongside Toews. Pairing Hossa and Toews with Kruger can really help him develop well.

Stalberg-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Kruger-Hossa

Just my opinion, but I'm leaving my view of Kane off the ice out of this. Kane gets along with his teammates and is not a clubhouse cancer, and we want to trade him? Yet bringing in E. Kane is a great idea.

Sorry for my little rant here, I've had about 9 hours today to think this over and it was a crappy work day. Oh well, beer time.

- HawksHype


You've come to the place for a rant, but no guarantees they'll be received well...
LA_Kings6720
Los Angeles Kings
Location: Kings fan since '96 ticket holder since '98 Los Angeles, CA
Joined: 07.12.2010

Jul 9 @ 6:56 PM ET
I've been waiting all day at work to write on here. I know you guys have moved off this issue to guns and *cough* luongo *cough* but Kane should not be traded or thought about trading, unless a deal blows you away. This deal listed is not enough for me. These teams need to make us an offer we can't refuse, and reiterate the trade by calling Bowman and saying, "Here's an offer you can't refuse" in the godfather voice. We would be trading our 1RW/2C and 3D for a 2C and 3D. Where does this make sense?! Why would we possibly trade not only a top 6, but a top 3 player for that? In my opinion, we get worse. Kane put up about 60 points while playing in a position he was not familiar with. Kane is a top wing and paired with Toews is awesome to watch. I think we need to trade for a 2C without trading a top 6 or hand it to Kruger. Kane needs to move back over to RW alongside Toews. Pairing Hossa and Toews with Kruger can really help him develop well.

Stalberg-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Kruger-Hossa

Just my opinion, but I'm leaving my view of Kane off the ice out of this. Kane gets along with his teammates and is not a clubhouse cancer, and we want to trade him? Yet bringing in E. Kane is a great idea.

Sorry for my little rant here, I've had about 9 hours today to think this over and it was a crappy work day. Oh well, beer time.

- HawksHype


I know Im a Kings fan, but I am a HUGE P. Kane fan and I would HATE to see Kane on MTL.
Sundevil
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 04.24.2012

Jul 9 @ 6:56 PM ET
frol·ic n.

1. Gaiety; merriment: fun and frolic.
2. A gay, carefree time.
3. A playful antic.
intr.v. frol·icked, frol·ick·ing, frol·ics
1. To behave playfully and uninhibitedly; romp.
2. To engage in merrymaking, joking, or teasing.

Frolik n.

1. Forward, professional hockey player, awful shooting percentage, overpaid, expendable.

- ArlingtonRob


Well done!!
HawksHype
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.08.2011

Jul 9 @ 6:59 PM ET
You've come to the place for a rant, but no guarantees they'll be received well...
- ArlingtonRob


That's alright, I can accept it. It's all opinion anyway. No one here has one ounce of say in the matter.
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.18.2009

Jul 9 @ 7:08 PM ET
Damn I hope the Hawks acquire him...
- ArlingtonRob


You don't say.
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.18.2009

Jul 9 @ 7:09 PM ET


Frolik n.

1. Forward, professional hockey player, awful shooting percentage, overpaid, expendable.

- ArlingtonRob




About right. You forgot the part where he only shows up for the playoffs.
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.18.2009

Jul 9 @ 7:11 PM ET
Kane gets along with his teammates and is not a clubhouse cancer
- HawksHype


You sure about that? There is speculation that it is just the opposite.
mrpaulish
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Itasca, IL
Joined: 01.18.2010

Jul 9 @ 7:11 PM ET
A little too much some days...

- EKolb13


IMpossible ! That stuff is the best !!!
1goalLordStanley
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chitown, IL
Joined: 01.18.2010

Jul 9 @ 7:12 PM ET


About right. You forgot the part where he only shows up for the playoffs.

- EKolb13


Well hey, if he only shows up for the playoffs, we might as well keep him. Seems to be the only one that does lately.
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.18.2009

Jul 9 @ 7:13 PM ET
IMpossible ! That stuff is the best !!!
- mrpaulish


Paulie, you're awesome! Always good times when you're here.
mrpaulish
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Itasca, IL
Joined: 01.18.2010

Jul 9 @ 7:14 PM ET

at least I'm not having a Mrpaulish moment and confessing my love for you guys...

- southernhawk


Its true ! I love you all , except CANUSA17 from the nukes thread and a few others


Your Hawks therapy is the best , I know there is others out there like me , dying for the Hawks to do something !

NewToHockey
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 02.23.2010

Jul 9 @ 7:14 PM ET


About right. You forgot the part where he only shows up for the playoffs.

- EKolb13

Yet we complain about the players who only produce in the regular season.
southernhawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: of champions, AL
Joined: 01.19.2012

Jul 9 @ 7:15 PM ET
Paulie, you're awesome! Always good times when you're here.

- EKolb13


Agreed I love you guys
mrpaulish
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Itasca, IL
Joined: 01.18.2010

Jul 9 @ 7:15 PM ET
Agreed I love you guys
- southernhawk

southernhawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: of champions, AL
Joined: 01.19.2012

Jul 9 @ 7:16 PM ET
Its true ! I love you all , except CANUSA17 from the nukes thread and a few others


Your Hawks therapy is the best , I know there is others out there like me , dying for the Hawks to do something !

- mrpaulish

Yup
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31  Next