Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Leafs Not Partcipating In Rookie Tournament; Dupuis Departs
Author Message
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jul 6 @ 9:56 AM ET

- AdamFrench

They had it coming and you know it,
The_Vark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.21.2011

Jul 6 @ 9:56 AM ET
He was the only who posted something not offensive unless you hate KISS, then it was, haha.
- LeafMan

I hate kiss
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere Between, NB
Joined: 07.17.2010

Jul 6 @ 9:57 AM ET
Was it me? I dont remember getting home last night and I woke up on my balcony.
- markmark

Is there now a wilting tree directly below your balcony?
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh
Joined: 04.06.2011

Jul 6 @ 9:58 AM ET
They had it coming and you know it,
- LeafMan

BURN THEM ALL
.HOHO.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Its better to let people think you're an idiot, than to open your mouth and confirm their suspicions, NS
Joined: 07.05.2010

Jul 6 @ 9:58 AM ET
and you follow it up by bypassing the filter, very nice.
- LeafMan


*waits for screen with all the BIG PRETTY RED WORDS
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jul 6 @ 9:59 AM ET
BURN THEM ALL
- AdamFrench

I would but we are not allowed to burn stuff without a permit now,
MaximusAurelius
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: #FireDubas
Joined: 04.23.2012

Jul 6 @ 10:00 AM ET
Freudian slip?

Goaltending has plagued this team since Belfour days and should be the priority. And giving up the farm for a pending UFA doesn't make sense to me.

Plus, the Ducks (much like what they're asking for with Bobby Ryan) want a bluechip prospect, which means they'd definitely want Gardiner/Rielly in return, much the same way that CBJ wants similar for Nash. Despite having an off-year, Getzlaf would command a hefty price and I don't think Phaneuf would do it.

- gravyface


Phaneuf + Frattin + Rielly / Gardiner would be acceptable in my opinion if it means Getzlaf will be your #1C (contract extension a prerequisite)
KABLOOEY
Calgary Flames
Joined: 01.19.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:01 AM ET
Mike Augello: Leafs Not Partcipating In Rookie Tournament; Dupuis Departs
- mikeinbuffalo

I think it's awesome Burke is paying Armstrong and Tucker (yes Tucker) 1M each not to play this year.
KABLOOEY
Calgary Flames
Joined: 01.19.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:01 AM ET
I would but we are not allowed to burn stuff without a permit now,
- LeafMan

Don't ban me, just having fun. It's Stampede week in Cowtown!
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jul 6 @ 10:03 AM ET
Don't ban me, just having fun. It's Stampede week in Cowtown!
- KABLOOEY

No worries, haha
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Jul 6 @ 10:04 AM ET
Phaneuf + Frattin + Rielly / Gardiner would be acceptable in my opinion if it means Getzlaf will be your #1C (contract extension a prerequisite)
- MaximusAurelius



that is too much

Phaneuf + Frattin + Franson
The_Vark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.21.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:05 AM ET
Was it me? I dont remember getting home last night and I woke up on my balcony.
- markmark

faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Jul 6 @ 10:05 AM ET
I think it's awesome Burke is paying Armstrong and Tucker (yes Tucker) 1M each not to play this year.
- KABLOOEY



So the Flames fans are here to chirp...... LOL

How are all those NTC/NMC contracts working for you??
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 07.27.2010

Jul 6 @ 10:05 AM ET
Is there now a wilting tree directly below your balcony?
- JIMI-JAMES


Just broken glass. It woke me up when it rolled out of my hand.
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere Between, NB
Joined: 07.17.2010

Jul 6 @ 10:05 AM ET
I think it's awesome Burke is paying Armstrong and Tucker (yes Tucker) 1M each not to play for the Leafs this year.
- KABLOOEY

Fixed...and Fletcher bought out Tucker I believe, not Burke
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jul 6 @ 10:05 AM ET
*waits for screen with all the BIG PRETTY RED WORDS
- .HOHO.

Nah, I just removed the html tags from the post.
Cfser
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Anyone who claims insider know
Joined: 07.26.2006

Jul 6 @ 10:07 AM ET
They had their fun, unfortunately it cost them big time.
- LeafMan


I showed up halfway through and lost brains cells reading a page and left.
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown
Joined: 02.19.2009

Jul 6 @ 10:07 AM ET
that is too much

Phaneuf + Frattin + Franson

- faceto27


Agreed, too much. But now we're in the market for a #1 defenseman because nobody else on the Leafs are capable of eating Dion's minutes. And that #1 defenseman is going to cost us another pile of prospects and roster players, so we've basically stripmined our team to address a #1 center, exactly what Burke said he wouldn't do (and exactly what alot of teams are not going to do for people like Nash or Ryan).
Cfser
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Anyone who claims insider know
Joined: 07.26.2006

Jul 6 @ 10:08 AM ET
I think it's awesome Burke is paying Armstrong and Tucker (yes Tucker) 1M each not to play this year.
- KABLOOEY


Ya its all Burkes fault tucker got bought out before he even got here. . . .
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers
Joined: 07.20.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:08 AM ET
I think it's awesome Burke is paying Armstrong and Tucker (yes Tucker) 1M each not to play this year.
- KABLOOEY

Can Tucker still play?
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers
Joined: 07.20.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:09 AM ET
I showed up halfway through and lost brains cells reading a page and left.
- Cfser

You're outta your mind...
Cfser
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Anyone who claims insider know
Joined: 07.26.2006

Jul 6 @ 10:11 AM ET
You're outta your mind...
- Flyfreaky


I'm pretty sure I saw a few post from you in that poop fest!
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown
Joined: 02.19.2009

Jul 6 @ 10:12 AM ET
David Pagnotta ‏@TheFourthPeriod
@faceofgravy Fact is, other than MacArthur nobody else (even Kulemin) showed they can be a 2nd liner this year. That's why Leafs are hunting
Expand

22s Gravy Face ‏@faceofgravy
@TheFourthPeriod they absolutely are not hunting for wingers. Lupul played great this year, Mac's numbers are on par for top6. Kadri next up

Guy thinks first of all, JVR is going to stick as center, and if he does, we're trading for more wingers.
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers
Joined: 07.20.2011

Jul 6 @ 10:13 AM ET
I'm pretty sure I saw a few post from you in that poop fest!
- Cfser

You know, there were a couple of funny posts, but then it just turned into a sh*tfest...I took my leave to go ruin other threads with my stench...
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Jul 6 @ 10:13 AM ET
Agreed, too much. But now we're in the market for a #1 defenseman because nobody else on the Leafs are capable of eating Dion's minutes. And that #1 defenseman is going to cost us another pile of prospects and roster players, so we've basically stripmined our team to address a #1 center, exactly what Burke said he wouldn't do (and exactly what alot of teams are not going to do for people like Nash or Ryan).
- gravyface



both Gardiner and Riley have the potential to be number one defensemen.

So the way I look at it, we give up our current 1D for a 1C.......... we have potentially a 1D in the system whereas we have no 1C in the system
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84  Next