Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: JVR Could Be “Center” Of Attention; Post-Draft Posturing
Author Message
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jun 25 @ 9:53 AM ET
Because we trade them away.. Look at Rask

People want to do the same here.. "Just include Scrivens in the Lu deal"....

- mfreedman

He had to be traded, people still to this day say we should have kept Rask, JFJ offered him a contract three times and the agent rejected it, Leaf would have lost his rights if he was not traded, it just happens it was the wrong trade, just a big mistake for who he was traded for.
cor99
Location: ON
Joined: 07.15.2007

Jun 25 @ 9:53 AM ET
The thing is....if we keep going with risky goalies, do these guys care to come play for us? Not that I really want to go after Stastny for the likely price he'll cost....but just saying. Toronto isnt looking too inviting as of yet. Luongo could help in that department.
- noename09


I'm not to sure about that. Despite what people say, I think we are on the right track and players see that.

The 1st year and a holf of Burke's tenure was rough (Komi signing, Kessel deal) but since then he's filled our cupboards with prospects that are starting to become NHL ready.

I think we appeal to Schultz, he can fit in our top 4, and he can play with his buddy Jake Gardiner.

Vancouver is his home town, while Oilers are pretty much the perfect fit and timing for him to go to, and is close to Vancouver.

Paul Stastny wouldn't come too expensive I don't think. Connolly, Franson, Percy and a 4th? I'm not to sure when it comes to trade proposals
jbold
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Raymond adds sandpaper to the Leafs- FakePartofMe, ON
Joined: 07.18.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:54 AM ET
http://panthers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8466141


cor99
Location: ON
Joined: 07.15.2007

Jun 25 @ 9:55 AM ET
He had to be traded, people still to this day say we should have kept Rask, JFJ offered him a contract three times and the agent rejected it, Leaf would have lost his rights if he was not traded, it just happens it was the wrong trade, just a big mistake for who he was traded for.
- LeafMan


Where did you hear that? I just googled it and found zip
D.Lemieux
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TRADE ME RIGHT FRANKING NOW
Joined: 06.18.2012

Jun 25 @ 9:56 AM ET
not going to happen. Any team that's losing their #1 center is not getting better with those guys in exchange. A #1 center is going to be a very good roster player, a high-end prospect, and a 1st round pick, possibly a 2nd round pick too.
- gravyface



Agreed. Startng point for a true 1C is Gardiner, 1st rounder ++

GoneFull
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ON
Joined: 07.31.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:56 AM ET
YO my dizzle!!

Uh, I dunno man, I really want Kadri to get a long look this year. The funny thing is, for all the people fearing that Burke is gonna over pay or trade away the future for pieces, he's not. He's also giving the impression (As far as I see it) that he's going to be pretty stubborn about trading away any assets.

I think he out-waited Holmgren on the JVR deal whick obviously worked out in the Leafs favor in terms of asset exchange. I think He'll have the same approach with our other assets. I Believe that Kadri, while maybe losing favor of the fans, hasn't lost Burkie just yet... Connolly on the other hand...

- PTVinnyMac



I can't see Connolly playing here next season. He gets dumped on some sucker or sent to the minors. I know Burke is loathe to do that, but NYR did it and it doesn't seem to cost them any sort of bad reputation.

... on the other hand, I don't think much of Colborne. Bozak is an OK little player, but not a first liner, and not a 3rd/4th liner either.

Maybe Connolly plays after all
IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 9:57 AM ET
http://panthers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8466141



- jbold

smartass lol
IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 9:57 AM ET
http://panthers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8466141



- jbold

smartass lol
GoneFull
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ON
Joined: 07.31.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:57 AM ET
http://panthers.nhl.com/club/player.htm?id=8466141



- jbold


Hey how did you do that?
Colin Dambrauskas
Location: Office Chair - @ColinDJD
Joined: 08.04.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:57 AM ET
There are lots of teams out there going with a young tandem or a "no name" goaltender though.

I don't think Luongo brings a wow factor to our team at all because everyone knows that we're still rebuilding and not really a contender soon anyways, and adding Luongo doesn't change that.

- gravyface


if we can snag Luongo for a salary dump and mediocre asset, something we can afford to move, it dosnt HURT us to bring the guy in. By no way does bringing in somone of his caliber HURT us...by no way does WINNING more games, HURT us....man you guys have all gotten so used to losing that it seems like the norm to you....

the only reason Luongo is likely not a Leaf yet is because Gillis is upset with the situation and dosnt want to give him away, because he HAS WORTH. If he didnt have worth or if he was really a burden, he would have been gone now witht hat "horrendous" contract. Lets be real...Gillis wouldnt be negotiating so hard if he didnt feel Lu had actual value. Burke wants Lu, he will help this team, but he understands the predicament Gillis is in and wants to take advantage of it.
cor99
Location: ON
Joined: 07.15.2007

Jun 25 @ 9:58 AM ET
Adam Proteau ‏@Proteautype

Here's the problem with Luongo refusing to waive his no-trade clause to go to Toronto or Chicago: About 27 other teams have no-want clauses.

GoneFull
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ON
Joined: 07.31.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:59 AM ET
Adam Proteau ‏@Proteautype

Here's the problem with Luongo refusing to waive his no-trade clause to go to Toronto or Chicago: About 27 other teams have no-want clauses.


- cor99


nice!
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Jun 25 @ 9:59 AM ET
if we can snag Luongo for a salary dump and mediocre asset, something we can afford to move, it dosnt HURT us to bring the guy in. By no way does bringing in somone of his caliber HURT us...by no way does WINNING more games, HURT us....man you guys have all gotten so used to losing that it seems like the norm to you....

the only reason Luongo is likely not a Leaf yet is because Gillis is upset with the situation and dosnt want to give him away, because he HAS WORTH. If he didnt have worth or if he was really a burden, he would have been gone now witht hat "horrendous" contract. Lets be real...Gillis wouldnt be negotiating so hard if he didnt feel Lu had actual value. Burke wants Lu, he will help this team, but he understands the predicament Gillis is in and wants to take advantage of it.

- noename09



For somebody that doesn't have a name......... using that kind of logic will get you a name

Well said....... Pay attention everybody to what he said.
D.Lemieux
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: TRADE ME RIGHT FRANKING NOW
Joined: 06.18.2012

Jun 25 @ 9:59 AM ET
Why not though? would it hurt to see some playoff action? Get some winning atmosphere for our youth? we may not be in the position to challenge for the cup, but a couple years of having a pretty good goalie in Lu until Reimer is ready to take over is not a bad thing.

What do you think is better for our youngsters? Winning more games and learning along the way or having to suck and lose a hell of a lot while trying to learn??

- IrishRage


You write as if Luongo is the only choice out there. Not that I don't agree with your general thoughts above.In my opionion Luongo isnt the best way to get there.

But hey just my opinion.
IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 10:00 AM ET
Adam Proteau ‏@Proteautype

Here's the problem with Luongo refusing to waive his no-trade clause to go to Toronto or Chicago: About 27 other teams have no-want clauses.


- cor99

bwahaha
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Jun 25 @ 10:01 AM ET
Hey how did you do that?
- GoneFullRetard


He reads twitter.
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 07.27.2010

Jun 25 @ 10:01 AM ET
if we can snag Luongo for a salary dump and mediocre asset, something we can afford to move, it dosnt HURT us to bring the guy in. By no way does bringing in somone of his caliber HURT us...by no way does WINNING more games, HURT us....man you guys have all gotten so used to losing that it seems like the norm to you....

the only reason Luongo is likely not a Leaf yet is because Gillis is upset with the situation and dosnt want to give him away, because he HAS WORTH. If he didnt have worth or if he was really a burden, he would have been gone now witht hat "horrendous" contract. Lets be real...Gillis wouldnt be negotiating so hard if he didnt feel Lu had actual value. Burke wants Lu, he will help this team, but he understands the predicament Gillis is in and wants to take advantage of it.

- noename09


I think most people are on the NO Luongo train because of price. If he comes back for a small return hell ya, sign me up. But it wont be a small return so hell no, he can hang in VAN for 10 more.
Colin Dambrauskas
Location: Office Chair - @ColinDJD
Joined: 08.04.2010

Jun 25 @ 10:01 AM ET
YO my dizzle!!

Uh, I dunno man, I really want Kadri to get a long look this year. The funny thing is, for all the people fearing that Burke is gonna over pay or trade away the future for pieces, he's not. He's also giving the impression (As far as I see it) that he's going to be pretty stubborn about trading away any assets.

I think he out-waited Holmgren on the JVR deal whick obviously worked out in the Leafs favor in terms of asset exchange. I think He'll have the same approach with our other assets. I Believe that Kadri, while maybe losing favor of the fans, hasn't lost Burkie just yet... Connolly on the other hand...

- PTVinnyMac


Im all for giving Kadri the time, but when I think of trades and guys I wouldnt necessarily miss, Kadri/Mac/Franson are among the top of that list. (Guys who have some value).
IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 10:02 AM ET
You write as if Luongo is the only choice out there. Not that I don't agree with your general thoughts above.In my opionion Luongo isnt the best way to get there.

But hey just my opinion.

- D.Lemieux

He is the best option out there right now without having to gut our farm team.
If you can get a top 10 (depending on who you ask) goalie in the league for under stock market value, you do it.

If Luongo had 2 or 3 years left on his contract you can bet your bottom dollar he would cost a HELL of a lot more than he would right now
mfreedman
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Thornhill, ON
Joined: 10.04.2010

Jun 25 @ 10:03 AM ET
Okay you name me a goalie that was top notch all star goalie, that was NOT a good goalie when he was in his late 30's
- faceto27


Name me a top notch all-star goalie that hasn't won a cup that you would include in that list

Vokoun is now struggling in his late 30's after years of great performance
Joseph struggles in his later years
Richter same thing
Potvin as well

IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 10:05 AM ET
Name me a top notch all-star goalie that hasn't won a cup that you would include in that list
- mfreedman

hextall?


acresd
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: London, ON
Joined: 03.02.2006

Jun 25 @ 10:06 AM ET
He is the best option out there right now without having to gut our farm team.
If you can get a top 10 (depending on who you ask) goalie in the league for under stock market value, you do it.

If Luongo had 2 or 3 years left on his contract you can bet your bottom dollar he would cost a HELL of a lot more than he would right now

- IrishRage



The problem is Gillis knows Burke needs Luongo. Eventhough Burke makes things sound like there are other options out there. The fact is, there is not a lot of choices out there, without overpayment. I think Luongo will be a leaf as well, but I think it will cost us more than what the fan base will want to pay, and the length of that contract scares me. But since he signed that before he was 35. If he retires, then the rest of the salary does not count against the cap.
Colin Dambrauskas
Location: Office Chair - @ColinDJD
Joined: 08.04.2010

Jun 25 @ 10:06 AM ET
I can't see Connolly playing here next season. He gets dumped on some sucker or sent to the minors. I know Burke is loathe to do that, but NYR did it and it doesn't seem to cost them any sort of bad reputation.

... on the other hand, I don't think much of Colborne. Bozak is an OK little player, but not a first liner, and not a 3rd/4th liner either.

Maybe Connolly plays after all

- GoneFullRetard




Connolly is our best PK'er, one of our hardest workers and best vets!!


IrishRage
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็༼ ຈل͜ຈ༽ส�, ON
Joined: 08.02.2008

Jun 25 @ 10:08 AM ET


Connolly is our best PK'er, one of our hardest workers and best vets!!



- noename09

i just choked on my coffee... no more saying connolly and best pk'er in the same sentence please.
Trying not to die over here
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 07.27.2010

Jun 25 @ 10:09 AM ET


Connolly is our best PK'er, one of our hardest workers and best vets!!



- noename09


Dont forget that he is our best fighter as well.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86  Next