Jacques Martin was quite possibly the only person in that entire organization who had an inkling of what he was doing.
- dt99999

Let's not get carried away here......

Mr. Gervais is doing an incredible job managing the players equipments.

Jacques Martin was quite possibly the only person in that entire organization who had an inkling of what he was doing.
- dt99999

This is less compelling, Dilbert.

Dear Howard.

Please 36 Dan.

Thanks
stormey.
- stormey

Is this 86 lite?

Is this 86 lite?
- hscesq

I have no idea.

Ask Lou.

I have no idea.
- stormey

Compelling.

36 > Order 66 > Loi 78

http://www.hockeyinsideou...lvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Printing Gill's mug on a couple of cases of Ex is pretty awesome.

Compelling.
- hscesq

Lou threatened to 36 stormeyalterego yesterday.
he said you would know what it meant.

Looks like a three-horse race, Howie.
- mcmanmat

http://www.hockeyinsideout.com/news/hal-gill-offers-deep-look-inside-his-former-habs?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Printing Gill's mug on a couple of cases of Ex is pretty awesome.
- _nay_

best part:

The prevailing sentiment is that the Canadiens have turned an important corner in their rebuilding with the hiring of Marc Bergevin as general manager to replace Pierre Gauthier. The Gauthier era was confounding, to say the least. What was your take on it?

(Almost 15 minutes of Gill’s reply was off the record. What follows was on the record.)

Lou threatened to 36 stormeyalterego yesterday.
he said you would know what it meant.
- stormey

He was wrong. Unless 36 means a three year ban.

He was wrong. Unless 36 means a three year ban.
- hscesq

I think nobody in here was bright enough to think of that.

I think nobody in here was bright enough to think of that.
- _nay_

Hmm.

He was wrong. Unless 36 means a three year ban.
- hscesq

did fakestormey get 35 ban so far?

Who are you pulling for?

Who are you pulling for?
- Oilhab

law 78 to be fully enforced

law 78 to be fully enforced
- Symba007

Any law restricting the freedom of hipsters is ok in my books

Any law restricting the freedom of hipsters is ok in my books
- Oilhab

You're gonna make some of the posters here cry now.

You're gonna make some of the posters here cry now.
- mr.peanut

Article 16 of the bill furthermore declares illegal for demonstrations of more than 50 people, at any location in Quebec, unless the dates, times, starting point, and routes of those locations and also the duration of the venue and the means of transportation that will be used by participants, if applicable, have been submitted to and approved by Quebec police

I am a bit suprised that it has taken so long for Quebec to do this.

Article 16 of the bill furthermore declares illegal for demonstrations of more than 50 people, at any location in Quebec, unless the dates, times, starting point, and routes of those locations and also the duration of the venue and the means of transportation that will be used by participants, if applicable, have been submitted to and approved by Quebec police

I am a bit suprised that it has taken so long for Quebec to do this.
- Oilhab

I'm still trying to figure out what's so bad about this.

I'm still trying to figure out what's so bad about this.
- mr.peanut

It only makes sense, but you know sometimes you have that spur of the moment reaction to gather 50 people and riot hold a rally.

And that has now been deemed illegal by the oppresive governement

Damn them, Damn them all to hell

I'm still trying to figure out what's so bad about this.
- mr.peanut

It's kinda like fireamrs in the US, it would a good thing to take it away, but most people scream it's a freedom guaranted in the constitution.

It's kinda like fireamrs in the US, it would a good thing to take it away, but most people scream it's a freedom guaranted in the constitution.
- Fredobbface

But all they have to do is make one phone call and say we are holding a rally here from this time to that time.

Pretty sure other provinces have to do this.

It only makes sense, but you know sometimes you have that spur of the moment reaction to gather 50 people and riot hold a rally.

And that has now been deemed illegal by the oppresive governement

Damn them, Damn them all to hell
- Oilhab

Yup this dictatorship has installed this law to protect the nonprotesters. How dare they consider them just because their windows get smashed and cars set on fire.

Article 16 of the bill furthermore declares illegal for demonstrations of more than 50 people, at any location in Quebec, unless the dates, times, starting point, and routes of those locations and also the duration of the venue and the means of transportation that will be used by participants, if applicable, have been submitted to and approved by Quebec police

I am a bit suprised that it has taken so long for Quebec to do this.
- Oilhab

It also says that one person has to be responsible for the actions of a group. So, if I'm the organizer, and one or two people decide to start throwing stuff and make trouble, I'm responsible for them and could receive a fine that goes from 7000$ to 35000$.

No one can be held accountable for the actions of 50+ people...this is ridiculous. The government is trying to mute the population, and this law is causing prejudice to the right to manifest, and the right to association. This bubble is going to burst into Charest's face sooner or later.

That being said, I'm not on the side of students, but I'm not on the side of Charest's corrupt government either. I just think they should do a cleanup in their own backyard before throwing the bill to the students, or the population (like they are doing with the healthcare).