Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: John Jaeckel: Suter To Chicago: More Likely Than You Think
Author Message
scorerstouch
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 02.21.2011

May 25 @ 8:09 PM ET
I gotta our next goalie!

http://www.torontosun.com...notes-the-return-of-hasek


Dominator!

Before all of you get on the no band wagon.... realize this..... he is better than what we got, even at 47 years of age. Last season in the KHL he posted a 2.15 GAA with .915 S%.


He would look slick back in our jersey. It was always a big mistake trading him instead of trading Eddie.
southernhawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: of champions, AL
Joined: 01.19.2012

May 25 @ 8:10 PM ET
They both have their strengths, you mentioned Konopka's. Burish is a better skater, has more offensive talents, and is bit more versatile in that he can move up and down the lineup a bit if needed.

I'd take either or both, and not think twice about it.

- Ogilthorpe2


Yes konopka is a tried and true 4th liner burish can fill more rolls than K

southernhawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: of champions, AL
Joined: 01.19.2012

May 25 @ 8:16 PM ET
No god no. .....the dominator can stay in the khl...if Stan did that id start pulling for the nucks
Assman22
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: San Francisco, CA
Joined: 04.13.2012

May 25 @ 8:28 PM ET
I was actually thinking Hammer and Danault since he is a Quebec native if I am correct. (Would love to put Frolik in that deal too and pick up Emelin).
- hawks2010


True, but adding Kruger frees up a possibly much needed $900k and Danault is likely to be better than Kruger anyway. I'd love to see Frolik fetch Emelin, even though I'm a big Frolik fan and think he's under utilized by Q. Give him some quality PT on the 2nd line for more than a couple games and he'll give you what he's worth. Bergevin knows the Hawks like the back of his hand. It's certainly not far fetched to have him reach for a few guys from our roster or Rockford.

StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.03.2011

May 25 @ 8:36 PM ET
Why can't the Hawks' PP look as good as NJ's just did?

What a great goal.
fattybeef
Joined: 05.04.2010

May 25 @ 8:43 PM ET
True, but adding Kruger frees up a possibly much needed $900k and Danault is likely to be better than Kruger anyway. I'd love to see Frolik fetch Emelin, even though I'm a big Frolik fan and think he's under utilized by Q. Give him some quality PT on the 2nd line for more than a couple games and he'll give you what he's worth. Bergevin knows the Hawks like the back of his hand. It's certainly not far fetched to have him reach for a few guys from our roster or Rockford.
- Assman22


Silly, Kruger has proven he is a NHL player, Danault has proven zip.
robhawks
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Woodbridge, ON
Joined: 12.05.2009

May 25 @ 8:46 PM ET
Hey Ogi, I like your trades, what if we added this too:

Sharp, Frolik, and prospect to the Islanders for Matt Martin and Streit. Second line now has - Martin, Statsney, and Hossa
Streit runs the power play.

fattybeef
Joined: 05.04.2010

May 25 @ 8:55 PM ET
I gotta our next goalie!

http://www.torontosun.com...notes-the-return-of-hasek


Dominator!

Before all of you get on the no band wagon.... realize this..... he is better than what we got, even at 47 years of age. Last season in the KHL he posted a 2.15 GAA with .915 S%.


He would look slick back in our jersey. It was always a big mistake trading him instead of trading Eddie.

- scorerstouch


Ummmmm really?

You're going to get nit picky about two hall of fame goalies? Seems ridiculous.

TyCamScore
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 09.09.2010

May 25 @ 10:10 PM ET
Maters signs 1 year extension. Interesting. I thought he was gone, then again he is a Q guy.
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 07.03.2011

May 25 @ 10:33 PM ET
Maters signs 1 year extension. Interesting. I thought he was gone, then again he is a Q guy.
- TyCamScore


Mayers?

About the only addition from last summer who worked out - met expectations.
Al
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: , IL
Joined: 08.11.2006

May 25 @ 11:00 PM ET
Ummmmm really?

You're going to get nit picky about two hall of fame goalies? Seems ridiculous.


- fattybeef



Agree...

Can't blame the Hawks front office for keeping Belfaur.
Al
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: , IL
Joined: 08.11.2006

May 25 @ 11:00 PM ET
Ummmmm really?

You're going to get nit picky about two hall of fame goalies? Seems ridiculous.


- fattybeef



Agree...

Can't blame the Hawks front office for keeping Belfaur.
southernhawk
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: of champions, AL
Joined: 01.19.2012

May 25 @ 11:04 PM ET
new blog up guys
scorerstouch
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 02.21.2011

May 25 @ 11:59 PM ET
Ummmmm really?

You're going to get nit picky about two hall of fame goalies? Seems ridiculous.


- fattybeef


Yes REALLY! I'm not arguing about who is in net but trading Eddie would have yielded us a huge return and Dominator would have been the starter. Instead we traded Hasek for a bucket of non-alcoholic beer.
Al
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: , IL
Joined: 08.11.2006

May 26 @ 12:17 AM ET
Yes REALLY! I'm not arguing about who is in net but trading Eddie would have yielded us a huge return and Dominator would have been the starter. Instead we traded Hasek for a bucket of non-alcoholic beer.
- scorerstouch


At the time Hasek wasn't worth very much....
hawks1921
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: IL
Joined: 04.12.2010

May 26 @ 12:41 AM ET
Agree...

Can't blame the Hawks front office for keeping Belfaur.

- Al


except Belfour folded when the pressure mounted
scorerstouch
Chicago Blackhawks
Location: Chicago, IL
Joined: 02.21.2011

May 26 @ 12:53 AM ET
At the time Hasek wasn't worth very much....
- Al


True but his talent was on display during the highest pressure situations during the SC finals. He denied Super Mario twice on breakaways and while we still lost he kept us in games unlike Eddie. IMHO Hasek ended up the better goalie in the end and for obvious reasons.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23