Lundqvist.
- Jeffrey7146

agreed this guy is obviously the difference maker in the series right now, and if the Devils continue to not get bodies in front of him and let him see the puck this clearly then the series is over for us.

A shot to the head is a shot to the head and no DZ did not go down, nor did he imbelious!!
- Prucha

umm no. It not illegal to hit a guy in the head. It is however illegal to only contact and hit the head which is exactly what prust did and not what parise did at all. Parise's hit is more like what phillips did to cally and Prusts check is almost the exact same thing as hagelin's on alfie. So please use your brain if you have one and you should be able to see the difference.

Torts is the only coach i actually hope takes a clearing to the dome. And to the rag fan trying to defend prust and vilify Zach. GTFO your team is one of the dirtiest in the league. Are team plays with some class unlike yours.
- NickA

Are you serious ???"one of the dirtiest teams in the league." you obviously know zero about hockey. do yourself a favor and don't post anymore, you sound really ignorant.

Are you serious ???"one of the dirtiest teams in the league." you obviously know zero about hockey. do yourself a favor and don't post anymore, you sound really ignorant.
- Graves#9

Ill do whatever i please. And yes besides the nucks, pens, and flyers id slot your team right up there. Cheap shots are your teams specialty, and after the whistle bullpoop which they always start. Two suspensions so far in the playoffs backs up my statement. You can argue other hits could or should of been suspended but you cant argue either one of your suspensions. They are both deserved.

Ill do whatever i please. And yes besides the nucks, pens, and flyers id slot your team right up there. Cheap shots are your teams specialty, and after the whistle bullpoop which they always start. Two suspensions so far in the playoffs backs up my statement. You can argue other hits could or should of been suspended but you cant argue either one of your suspensions. They are both deserved.
- NickA

like i said, you look dumber with every post. "Cheap Shots" lol....... you are clueless!!!!

Oh, and by the way. take a look at the Zubrus hit, that was clean, right ????

like i said, you look dumber with every post. "Cheap Shots" lol....... you are clueless!!!!
- Graves#9

Id say deliberate elbows to heads with no effort to play the actually body or throw a correct hit is a cheap shot. My opinion is your team is cheap and dirty. Only behind a handful of other teams.
I'll have to see zubs hit again and i even said you can argue other hits should or could be suspendable but you failed to not read that part. But if your still defending what prust did here im confused as how that is even possible. But your right i guess im clueless.

Ill do whatever i please. And yes besides the nucks, pens, and flyers id slot your team right up there. Cheap shots are your teams specialty, and after the whistle bullpoop which they always start. Two suspensions so far in the playoffs backs up my statement. You can argue other hits could or should of been suspended but you cant argue either one of your suspensions. They are both deserved.
- NickA

Who are the dirty rangers? Hagelin? BTW the 2 eslbows were
quite different -Hags was an overly zealous and high follow through of
a check delivered from the side; prusts was a straight up
elbow to The back of the head w no other contact. Both illegal, yes.
The same? No. Prusts was much more egregious though less
damaging.
I think your 'rangers are dirty' glasses are clouding your vision.

Who are the dirty rangers? Hagelin? BTW the 2 eslbows were
quite different -Hags was an overly zealous and high follow through of
a check delivered from the side; prusts was a straight up
elbow to The back of the head w no other contact. Both illegal, yes.
The same? No. Prusts was much more egregious though less
damaging.
I think your 'rangers are dirty' glasses are clouding your vision.
- BobbySchmautz

Your probably right... should it really matter to you or any ranger fan i that i think your team is dirty? Wouldn't bother me if you thought the devils were the scummest team in the nhl. Arguing to try and get me to see your point of view is a waste as is mine to get you to admit your teams dirty. Thats not what im trying to do. But to defend either one of those elbows is mind bottling. Prusts was worse with a not as bad result. But Hagelins hit was dirty it was high and meant to hurt Alfie not just separate the man from the puck. There is never any reason to throw a check with anything but your shoulder period. Especially if your gonna come up high on a guy.

Your probably right... should it really matter to you or any ranger fan i that i think your team is dirty? Wouldn't bother me if you thought the devils were the scummest team in the nhl. Arguing to try and get me to see your point of view is a waste as is mine to get you to admit your teams dirty. Thats not what im trying to do. But to defend either one of those elbows is mind bottling. Prusts was worse with a not as bad result. But Hagelins hit was dirty it was high and meant to hurt Alfie not just separate the man from the puck. There is never any reason to throw a check with anything but your shoulder period. Especially if your gonna come up high on a guy.
- NickA

I said both elbows were illegal - just very different. Sorry for bottling
your mind by introducing such subtleties.