Location: Threw one in front blocked the, NJ Joined: 01.26.2012
Apr 29 @ 8:24 PM ET
Meh, I watched it again after the replay came up. On the first view, it seemed as if JvR made contact with his stick moving it, it went through the right side of Brodeur, where his stick wouldn't have been. I saw it differently on the first view, and it seemed like from the initial view JvR might have interfered with Brodeur's stick. It was minimal if it was, but to be honest, like I have said, that call is never going to be made whether or not JvR did it or not, but the question is should it be made if he did.....
Meh, I watched it again after the replay came up. On the first view, it seemed as if JvR made contact with his stick moving it, it went through the right side of Brodeur, where his stick wouldn't have been. I saw it differently on the first view, and it seemed like from the initial view JvR might have interfered with Brodeur's stick. It was minimal if it was, but to be honest, like I have said, that call is never going to be made whether or not JvR did it or not, but the question is should it be made if he did..... - _Zippy_
The correct call was made on that play. Your a good kid. A solid addition to the thread. It's going to be a long series. Look forward to further discussions.
i never thought i'd say this, but man why is brodeur female doging. he has no leg to stand on, that was a clean goal and there was hardly any contact. on top of that it looked to me that brodeur moved into the space three letters was taking up. what a female dog as move by a guy whose normally a class act.
Meh, I watched it again after the replay came up. On the first view, it seemed as if JvR made contact with his stick moving it, it went through the right side of Brodeur, where his stick wouldn't have been. I saw it differently on the first view, and it seemed like from the initial view JvR might have interfered with Brodeur's stick. It was minimal if it was, but to be honest, like I have said, that call is never going to be made whether or not JvR did it or not, but the question is should it be made if he did..... - _Zippy_
IF JvR made contact that impeded Brodeur's ability to make the stop, the goal shouldn't count.
He didn't. It's kind of like saying if my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle. That if is a problem.
i never thought i'd say this, but man why is brodeur female doging. he has no leg to stand on, that was a clean goal and there was hardly any contact. on top of that it looked to me that brodeur moved into the space three letters was taking up. what a female dog as move by a guy whose normally a class act. - flyerscup2011
Brodeur hardly said a word. I think your exaggerating here.
i never thought i'd say this, but man why is brodeur female doging. he has no leg to stand on, that was a clean goal and there was hardly any contact. on top of that it looked to me that brodeur moved into the space three letters was taking up. what a female dog as move by a guy whose normally a class act. - flyerscup2011
Huh? Brodeur has been embellishing and complaining for two decades. I don't fault him for it, because it works.
i just watched his post game interview. he made it a point to complain about the minimal (if any) contact by jvr. - flyerscup2011
I saw the quotes. Of course he did. What would you expect him to say? This is a 7 game series. It's gamesmanship. Campaigning to the get the next call his way. Same reason Coaches say things.
I'm loving how over powering our Power Play is. The Devils I believe had the first best PP and the Pens the 3rd best of the regular season. Sure doesn't look that way in the playoffs, which is very encouraging.
If JvR, Hartnell and Simmonds keep going to the net like they have to clock the goalie's vision, teams like New Jersey and New York don't stand a chance.
