Location: Somewhere in Niagara County, NY Joined: 07.06.2006
Apr 4 @ 11:41 PM ET
Dude, seriously, you don't think that play was F'd up?
Man the ONLY explanation for agreeing that the call (non-whistle) was OK, is that you are a Buffalo fan or a Leafs hater.
I have never seen a play even remotely similar to that and you can't tell me the ref could see the puck when he was still looking at the scrum after the puck was in the net. - GoneFullRetard
Go to TSN and look at the reverse angle shot. Puck was always visible. Lombardi wasn't on it, Scrivens never covered.
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
Apr 5 @ 7:07 AM ET
Go to TSN and look at the reverse angle shot. Puck was always visible. Lombardi wasn't on it, Scrivens never covered. - Purple Eagle
I can't believe this is still going on..... The Ref had no clue where the puck was, that's a fact. He should have blown the call down long ago, almost all your brethren have agreed. You are the only simpleton still going on about it. How dumb do you have to be to say go look at the video?? Dude the video is proving you wrong. The ref stood over pile and bobbed and weaved looking for the puck, he never had sight of it. If he did he wouldn't be jerking all over the place looking for it, he'd be locked in on it. And the dagger in your theory is that when the puck goes in the Ref doesn't signal a goal until several seconds of celebration and goal horn. He had no idea it was in until someone told him.
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
Apr 5 @ 7:10 AM ET
Go to TSN and look at the reverse angle shot. Puck was always visible. Lombardi wasn't on it, Scrivens never covered. - Purple Eagle
I can't believe this is still going on..... The Ref had no clue where the puck was, that's a fact. He should have blown the call down long ago, almost all your brethren have agreed. Dude the video is proving you wrong. The ref stood over pile and bobbed and weaved looking for the puck, he never had sight of it. If he did he wouldn't be jerking all over the place looking for it, he'd be locked in on it. Ref doesn't signal a goal until several seconds of celebration and goal horn. He had no idea it was in until someone told him.
Enough already....... you won. It's just too bad you suck so much you couldn't do it in regulation, we didn't want the points. Just be thankful that you got the help to get those 2 points.
The Ref had no clue where the puck was, that's a fact. He should have blown the call down long ago, almost all your brethren have agreed. You are the only simpleton still going on about it. How dumb do you have to be to say go look at the video?? Dude the video is proving you wrong. The ref stood over pile and bobbed and weaved looking for the puck, he never had sight of it. If he did he wouldn't be jerking all over the place looking for it, he'd be locked in on it. And the dagger in your theory is that when the puck goes in the Ref doesn't signal a goal until several seconds of celebration and goal horn. He had no idea it was in until someone told him.
