pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: (HE, HIM, HIS), ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
Chin up Pete.
All I'm saying is we can't move PK. We need to add some better D not get rid of the future of our D
8pts out of 8th - habs12
I only said move him if there is a problem. I'm not stupid, if EE has to blog about him needing to earn the respect of his teammates, clearly they do not respect him, so something is wrong in there.
|
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
Yemelin, Diaz, Georges, and PK. Now get some size on D for the other two open spots - habs12
AMEN.
But not just size, a guy who can hit would be appreciated.
Gill is big, very big.... |
|
|
|
These 4 games will tell us if they have a chance at the playoffs
WSH
PGH
DET
TOR
Need at least 6 out of the 8 points from these games - MTL1
Let me answer that for you. NO! |
|
RENATO6
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I like you, the flower is kill, ON Joined: 08.12.2009
|
|
|
pfft, I think even Sopel would have been a better idea than Campoli. - habby
Unfortunately yes.. along with Mara... both are better than Campoli |
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Cole Harbour, NS Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
AMEN.
But not just size, a guy who can hit would be appreciated.
Gill is big, very big.... - fidopro
Your right I'll qualify the statement. Two bigger D that can "skate and hit" |
|
God_then_kovy
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 02.06.2008
|
|
|
Sunday's win may have felt nice, but seeing how good Mcdonagh already is once again did not. Imo he's the best player the habs have let go of in recent memory and will only get better.
+30 in 84 career games
|
|
HABSFAN78
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Joined: 06.12.2009
|
|
|
I don't think they're gonna make the playoffs. It would take a 7+ game win streak and I don't think this team has it in them. - habby
Exactly, hopefully PG trades the UFA's for picks... |
|
RENATO6
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I like you, the flower is kill, ON Joined: 08.12.2009
|
|
|
I only said move him if there is a problem. I'm not stupid, if EE has to blog about him needing to earn the respect of his teammates, clearly they do not respect him, so something is wrong in there. - pete26
He will be good, the much vaunted Habs leadership seems sorely lacking with could be adding to it. Your leader normally should be one of your hardest working / best players. I don't think Cammy , Gomez, Gill are/were playing well enough to be listened to. |
|
habby
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maybe because he won best defenceman of the year, that's how they get paid these days-Alex Kovalev Joined: 08.31.2006
|
|
|
Sunday's win may have felt nice, but seeing how good Mcdonagh already is once again did not. Imo he's the best player the habs have let go of in recent memory and will only get better.
+30 in 84 career games
- God_then_kovy
Imagine that, a 12th overall pick panning out. Who could have predicted that? |
|
RENATO6
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I like you, the flower is kill, ON Joined: 08.12.2009
|
|
|
Sunday's win may have felt nice, but seeing how good Mcdonagh already is once again did not. Imo he's the best player the habs have let go of in recent memory and will only get better.
+30 in 84 career games
- God_then_kovy
And he plays a tone of minutes, he has been very solid this year even with Staal being out. |
|
HABSFAN78
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Joined: 06.12.2009
|
|
|
Imagine that, a 12th overall pick panning out. Who could have predicted that? - habby
|
|
God_then_kovy
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 02.06.2008
|
|
|
Imagine that, a 12th overall pick panning out. Who could have predicted that? - habby
They thought David Fischer was the better of the 2. |
|
habby
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maybe because he won best defenceman of the year, that's how they get paid these days-Alex Kovalev Joined: 08.31.2006
|
|
|
They thought David Fischer was the better of the 2. - God_then_kovy
NY? Just kidding.
The funny part is we never heard anything about McDonnaugh not developing, but we did hear about Fisher.
|
|
pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: (HE, HIM, HIS), ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
Sunday's win may have felt nice, but seeing how good Mcdonagh already is once again did not. Imo he's the best player the habs have let go of in recent memory and will only get better.
+30 in 84 career games
- God_then_kovy
Ah, the Gomez trade, the gift that keeps on giving |
|
HABSFAN78
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Joined: 06.12.2009
|
|
|
Ah, the Gomez trade, the gift that keeps on giving - pete26
It's really (frank)in depressing... |
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Cole Harbour, NS Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
NY? Just kidding.
The funny part is we never heard anything about McDonnaugh not developing, but we did hear about Fisher. - habby
Kind of sad that McDonnaugh and O'Byrne weren't good enough to make this defensively deep team
|
|
MTL1
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Brampton, ON Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
It's really (frank)in depressing... - HABSFAN78
Without Gomez you dont get Cammy or Gionta or the 2010 playoff run - lets move on - it was a bad trade - lets just hope we dont do another trade like that |
|
Steven Hindle
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal, QC Joined: 03.29.2010
|
|
|
I'm still baffled. EE reached a new high today. - Jayden
i didn't mean that he's on his way to that, but after the next three seasons, he's declining, Subban has at least six before making the same descent.
at the same time, Getzlaf hasn't been himself this year, and struggled with bad injuries last season |
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Cole Harbour, NS Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
I only said move him if there is a problem. I'm not stupid, if EE has to blog about him needing to earn the respect of his teammates, clearly they do not respect him, so something is wrong in there. - pete26
Price went through the same thing. Let the kids grow up. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: Gardez-le votre ANGLAIS, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
Why didn't I receive my acid pills ? |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
Without Gomez you dont get Cammy or Gionta or the 2010 playoff run - lets move on - it was a bad trade - lets just hope we dont do another trade like that - MTL1
BS. |
|
habby
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maybe because he won best defenceman of the year, that's how they get paid these days-Alex Kovalev Joined: 08.31.2006
|
|
|
Kind of sad that McDonnaugh and O'Byrne weren't good enough to make this defensively deep team - habs12
I've been pretty clear that I always liked him, but i thinks it's fair to say that trade is still open to debate until we see what happens with Bournival.
|
|
Steven Hindle
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal, QC Joined: 03.29.2010
|
|
|
Subban for Getzlaf is a no brainer. We have Beaulieu coming who's similar to PK but tougher.. We need a big centre!! - BingoLady
lol |
|
habby
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maybe because he won best defenceman of the year, that's how they get paid these days-Alex Kovalev Joined: 08.31.2006
|
|
|
BS. - Pecafan Fan
I think you're being too kind. |
|
HuileHab
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I eat richards for breakfast! - stormey Joined: 03.01.2010
|
|
|
These 4 games will tell us if they have a chance at the playoffs
WSH
PGH
DET
TOR
Need at least 6 out of the 8 points from these games - MTL1
THEY DON"T HAVE A SHOT AT THE PLAYOFFS!
|
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224 Next |