I wonder what prompred all the Leafs trolls to stop by? They must have meetings.


anyhow I scored this gem today.

I wonder what prompred all the Leafs trolls to stop by? They must have meetings.


anyhow I scored this gem today.



- Buffalo--Sabres

like used US currency to purchase that?

How many hits do the rangers have ???

$5 says he is making a list and checking it twice
- homiedclown

which teams are naughty, and which are nice??

None of them need a goalie.
- HonkFortheGoose

However, if you trade miller to them, you get their starter back...

#1 is this legit, did miller actually request a trade, and #2 who diggs the new avatar

If Miller did demand a trade it may be hard to move him to the west coast, Kings are set as are the Sharks. The Ducks could be a match but Hiller would have to come back, he makes 4.5 mill unless the Ducks can move him to another team.

If Miller did demand a trade it may be hard to move him to the west coast, Kings are set as are the Sharks. The Ducks could be a match but Hiller would have to come back, he makes 4.5 mill unless the Ducks can move him to another team.
- SABRES 89

Trade Miller, the hit from Lucic said it all.

Miller & Roy

For

Varlamov & Stastny

like used US currency to purchase that?
- HotSauceBlueChs

correct, more than I am willing to admit

PHOENIX is close, as is colorado(not close but not too far) and vancouver who is not too far to the north of cali.

Trade Miller, the hit from Lucic said it all.
- Irish 14

The whole team has no heart, they did nothing after that hit.

Miller & Roy

For

Varlamov & Stastny
- Losman

How does that work out money wise?

Anyone else notice that Garth has never embedded a video from ProHockeyTalk in his blog prior to today. Earlier today I posted my blog with a link to that exact video because the myhockeybuzz video embedding wasn't working.

Later in the same day Garth has that video in his blog...what a hack.

How does that work out money wise?
- mhp

Doesn't matter from a Colorado standpoint as they have 31.8mil in space as of today.


From our standpoint we gain 817k in space for next year.

Would we even get anything substantial back for miller at this point?
Same goes with stafford... And if we trade Roy, we still have a HUGE hole at center...
None of this chatter makes much sense to me

#1 is this legit, did miller actually request a trade, and #2 who diggs the new avatar
- dgkallday49

Legit, no way. Ask for a trade on a day off in Chicago on the road? C'mon.


The avatar is hard to follow. It looks like a 'NO' symbol over that retarded guys face in Goonies.

Legit, no way. Ask for a trade on a day off in Chicago on the road? C'mon.


The avatar is hard to follow. It looks like a 'NO' symbol over that retarded guys face in Goonies.
- Buffalo--Sabres

Lindy looks like Sloth.

Would we even get anything substantial back for miller at this point?
Same goes with stafford... And if we trade Roy, we still have a HUGE hole at center...
None of this chatter makes much sense to me
- jdfitz77

Depends on what you mean by substantial. Miller is still valuable to a team that doesn't have a true #1 goaltender. It's hard to move him from our perspective because he's having a down year, but for a team that thinks he's an upgrade it's perfect because they are "buying low".

Stafford is a tougher sell because unlike Miller, he's only had 1 season where he produced at the level you'd expect with his cap hit. Yet again, for a team that has cap space and a shortage of offense they might think they are getting a steal if they give us a couple bags of pucks and Staff scores 30+ next year.

Miller is much easier to sell than Stafford, that's why Staff should be dealt in a package with others.

Depends on what you mean by substantial. Miller is still valuable to a team that doesn't have a true #1 goaltender. It's hard to move him from our perspective because he's having a down year, but for a team that thinks he's an upgrade it's perfect because they are "buying low".

Stafford is a tougher sell because unlike Miller, he's only had 1 season where he produced at the level you'd expect with his cap hit. Yet again, for a team that has cap space and a shortage of offense they might think they are getting a steal if they give us a couple bags of pucks and Staff scores 30+ next year.

Miller is much easier to sell than Stafford, that's why Staff should be dealt in a package with others.
- SabreHess

Miller will sell jerseys and amp up the hype machine for any city. I wouldnt think it would be a good idea for him to go to Columbus or Phoenix, but cities like L.A., Dallas, St. Louis, Tampa would really benefit from his 'star status'. Plus I think his play will improve in a new locale on a better team.

Depends on what you mean by substantial. Miller is still valuable to a team that doesn't have a true #1 goaltender. It's hard to move him from our perspective because he's having a down year, but for a team that thinks he's an upgrade it's perfect because they are "buying low".

Stafford is a tougher sell because unlike Miller, he's only had 1 season where he produced at the level you'd expect with his cap hit. Yet again, for a team that has cap space and a shortage of offense they might think they are getting a steal if they give us a couple bags of pucks and Staff scores 30+ next year.

Miller is much easier to sell than Stafford, that's why Staff should be dealt in a package with others.
- SabreHess

I would like to see a deal something similar to what Colorado and St Louis did last year.

I would like to see a deal something similar to what Colorado and St Louis did last year.
- dadeadhead

Speaking of St. Louis, I'd like to swap Derek Roy for Patrick Berglund. Berglund is younger and has more upside, but he's in a major slump and their patience for him is wearing thin, not unlike our situation with Roy.

Depends on what you mean by substantial. Miller is still valuable to a team that doesn't have a true #1 goaltender. It's hard to move him from our perspective because he's having a down year, but for a team that thinks he's an upgrade it's perfect because they are "buying low".

Stafford is a tougher sell because unlike Miller, he's only had 1 season where he produced at the level you'd expect with his cap hit. Yet again, for a team that has cap space and a shortage of offense they might think they are getting a steal if they give us a couple bags of pucks and Staff scores 30+ next year.

Miller is much easier to sell than Stafford, that's why Staff should be dealt in a package with others.
- SabreHess

But in your example... Does miller + whatever (stafford, etc) get us back a #1 center AND a substantial goalie? Like u pointed out, any team "upgrading" to miller prob doesn't have a worthwhile goalie to send back to us

It's hard for me to see how a deal like this works for us

Speaking of St. Louis, I'd like to swap Derek Roy for Patrick Berglund. Berglund is younger and has more upside, but he's in a major slump and their patience for him is wearing thin, not unlike our situation with Roy.
- SabreHess

Berglund, Oshie, Backes, and Halak are who I'd be interested in.

Sabres getting just absolutely crushed by not only the nhlnetwork, but nationally by a front page yahoo.com story is probably the best thing that could happen to us as fans right now. They need a violent shove over the edge of change....