dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
He does.
If he could build up some leg and core strength, he could be better. - manvanfan
Needs to workout with Hoglander this summer.
|
|
dbot
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down Joined: 10.22.2008
|
|
|
Same - NorthNuck
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Needs to workout with Hoglander this summer. - dbot
He's got more hits than Hoggy does. Just different body type. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
He's got more hits than Hoggy does. Just different body type. - manvanfan
Centre of gravity is the big issue. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Big Head Hockey
@BigHeadHcky
Everyone this season with 40+ blocks, 40+ takeaways, 40+ hits, 80+ points:
— Auston Matthews
— Elias Pettersson - dbot
Last I looked (a month ago-ish) Petey had the best pk numbers out of our forwards. He quietly does all the things people refuse to see.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Forwards this season that are a PPG or over and 100 plus hits
Miller
Tkachuk
Forsberg
Pettersson
- manvanfan
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Daniel Gee
@DanielGScouting
I have already dug into @passittobulis' new book, & I can't recommend it enough. The sheer amount of behind-the-scenes information is wild. A tonne of work went into this to add context to some of the #Canucks most crucial draft moments.
As a draft nerd, this is an unreal read.
Looks like ive found a new book to read. |
|
Nighthawk
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Canuckville, BC Joined: 01.09.2015
|
|
|
Big difference in so-called refuse to see when ppl are talking about what they see. Nobody has questioned Petey’s D or other contributions but some of us do pick on the obvious. Disappearing for stretches. Part of the PP problem. No doubt he’s been value for this contract but soon as next season starts it begins a new era & he won’t have any wiggle room when 11.6m kicks in. Elite contracts get elite attention. He’ll be fine. |
|
NorthNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Yellowknife, NWT Joined: 05.30.2016
|
|
|
Looks like ive found a new book to read. - manvanfan
Let us know what the highlights are when you're done |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Big difference in so-called refuse to see when ppl are talking about what they see. Nobody has questioned Petey’s D or other contributions but some of us do pick on the obvious. Disappearing for stretches. Part of the PP problem. No doubt he’s been value for this contract but soon as next season starts it begins a new era & he won’t have any wiggle room when 11.6m kicks in. Elite contracts get elite attention. He’ll be fine. - Nighthawk
You have a bit of a habit of doing this. People have questioned his D and the fan base is much bigger than HB. Maybe you should word it..."I've never said..." instead of speaking for everybody. Not trying to be a jerk... just saying... |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
|
|
Big Head Hockey
@BigHeadHcky
Everyone this season with 40+ blocks, 40+ takeaways, 40+ hits, 80+ points:
— Auston Matthews
— Elias Pettersson - dbot
People focus on negativity and wallow in it i see it everyday. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Big difference in so-called refuse to see when ppl are talking about what they see. Nobody has questioned Petey’s D or other contributions but some of us do pick on the obvious. Disappearing for stretches. Part of the PP problem. No doubt he’s been value for this contract but soon as next season starts it begins a new era & he won’t have any wiggle room when 11.6m kicks in. Elite contracts get elite attention. He’ll be fine. - Nighthawk
He has been elite. So really he shouldn't have to change much and he will be fine. |
|
|
|
He does.
If he could build up some leg and core strength, he could be better. - manvanfan
Didn’t Rutherford mention that? Well not exactly but he did say petey will be a top 5 player in this league when he gets stronger. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
You have a bit of a habit of doing this. People have questioned his D and the fan base is much bigger than HB. Maybe you should word it..."I've never said..." instead of speaking for everybody. Not trying to be a jerk... just saying... - boonerbuck
Most just realize that the gold standard for defensive forwards Patrice Bergeron is a rarity. Same as other generational talents, they are in actuality few and far between. No different than scorers, generational, elite, great, good, the middle and bad. |
|
K-man25
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Location: Sayulita Joined: 09.02.2014
|
|
|
I’ve cooled on Greeway big time. He’s lost out there & ineffective.
Keep our D together is a start. They bang pretty well & let’s see how they do in the PO’s. Up front is lacking & could use 1-2 that aren’t devoid of hockey skills & some results. - Nighthawk
Sam Bennett has 1 more year after this, he’d be a great target. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Byron Bader
@ByronMBader
Of all forwards drafted since 2010, there has been 62 F to play 100+ games and maintain a point-per-game rate of 0.70+ (stars or pacing to be stars).
58/62 had an equivalency of 20+ in their draft year or D-1 year.
Of the 4 remaining (Verhaeghe, Bratt, Kyrou, Stone) were all born later in the year (May to August)... while also having DY equivalencies very near the 20 threshold.
That's some concrete numbers.
https://twitter.com/Byron...tatus/1657041470153715712
This one as well. Fine that Van got an NHL player but missed opportunity. |
|
|
|
I think the kings were relieved that game was over the Canucks bounced them around pretty good, keep playing the same way and be sharper around the net should be our goal. They shoot wide or high way to much. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Team toughness is the need. I don’t care if it’s a winger, D or a goalie. Zad and Joshua absolutely need to be brought back. This team is way too soft even with them - CanuckDon
|
|
|
|
Big difference in so-called refuse to see when ppl are talking about what they see. Nobody has questioned Petey’s D or other contributions but some of us do pick on the obvious. Disappearing for stretches. Part of the PP problem. No doubt he’s been value for this contract but soon as next season starts it begins a new era & he won’t have any wiggle room when 11.6m kicks in. Elite contracts get elite attention. He’ll be fine. - Nighthawk
People still calling Petey a 7 mil player are morons and making excuses to protect him. That label goes away in 10 more games but let them feel good about themselves. They are narrative monkeys.
It is like a person moving into a new home in a month that is worth 10 mil dollars. They have the contract but you will still get a few idiots calling them apartment dwellers for the next month.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
People still calling Petey a 7 mil player are morons and making excuses to protect him. That label goes away in 10 more games but let them feel good about themselves. They are narrative monkeys.
It is like a person moving into a new home in a month that is worth 10 mil dollars. They have the contract but you will still get a few idiots calling them apartment dwellers for the next month. - VANTEL
Alternat facts.
Only the most arrogant of fools would dismiss that this years totals are on this years contract and continue to argue that they are on next years contract year. |
|
|
|
Alternat facts.
Only the most arrogant of fools would dismiss that this years totals are on this years contract and continue to argue that they are on next years contract year.
- boonerbuck
This year is 2024. Petey has two contracts this year. For a person knocking people for not being accurate, that is some pretty sloppy posting you are doing here.
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
This year is 2024. Petey has two contracts this year. For a person knocking people for not being accurate, that is some pretty sloppy posting you are doing here. - VANTEL
Any way you try and spin it, this seasons totals are on this seasons contract. Keep trying genius... |
|
|
|
Any way you try and spin it, this seasons totals are on this seasons contract. Keep trying genius... - boonerbuck
So next year then, by your thinking, when Petey has 30 points at the end of Dec I can come in here and say what a terrible contract. Paying a player 11.6 for thirty points a year is horrible?
|
|