Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Karlsson to Tampa would be a response to Tavares from Atlantic rival
Author Message
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007

Jul 6 @ 1:12 AM ET
Nylander plus whatever else it takes; Kapanen, Liljegren, Sandin, 1st round pick.

Marner is untouchable.

- Unholy_Goalie

Karlsson won't accept a trade here because of taxes

there are 10 teams on his No Tax Clause
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:12 AM ET
Karlsson won't accept a trade here because of taxes
- twiztedmike


He'll make more money in Tampa Bay than he will in Ottawa, that's for damn sure.
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007

Jul 6 @ 1:13 AM ET
He'll make more money in Tampa Bay than he will in Ottawa, that's for damn sure.
- Unholy_Goalie

I meant Toronto
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:14 AM ET
Nylander plus whatever else it takes; Kapanen, Liljegren, Sandin, 1st round pick.

Marner is untouchable.

- Unholy_Goalie

Yeah I don't think so, not for an elite D. Call me back with Marner when you're ready to take off the goggles and make a real deal. The lesser player plus some other lesser players doesn't get it done.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:14 AM ET
I meant Toronto
- twiztedmike


Didn't have that bed spread as a child. Didn't get the Sundin or the Salming jersey as a kid at Christmas either.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:16 AM ET
Yeah I don't think so, not for an elite D. Call me back with Marner when you're ready to take off the goggles and make a real deal. The lesser player plus some other lesser players doesn't get it done.
- Zezel


So Tampa Bay is going to have to move Kucherov to get Karlsson?

It's happened many times before where the best player in the deal is going one way and the other way is going a package of good pieces but not an equally great player.
twiztedmike
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.06.2007

Jul 6 @ 1:18 AM ET
Didn't have that bed spread as a child. Didn't get the Sundin or the Salming jersey as a kid at Christmas either.
- Unholy_Goalie

420 blaze it hard
TonkaPhaneuf
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Where'd canucks fans go? -daeth Too busy with the lotto simulator - seagull
Joined: 11.22.2012

Jul 6 @ 1:21 AM ET
The lovely sales lady at the store said she doesn't think they'll get any tavares jerseys in this season.

Like yeah ok makes sense. Idiot
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:23 AM ET
So Tampa Bay is going to have to move Kucherov to get Karlsson?

It's happened many times before where the best player in the deal is going one way and the other way is going a package of good pieces but not an equally great player.

- Unholy_Goalie


So why don't you trade Marner for several lesser D men and picks? Happens all the time just ask Colorado and Philly how that works out. Hey rival GM, give us an elite D for our lesser forward and a bunch os unproven spare parts and garbage picks lolololol. Why, did the unicorn D demand a trade? This Nylander for a top D idea is fluff.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:25 AM ET
So why don't you trade Marner for several lesser D men and picks? Happens all the time just ask Colorado and Philly how that works out. Hey rival GM, give us an elite D for our lesser forward and a bunch os unproven spare parts and garbage picks lolololol. Why, did the unicorn D demand a trade? This Nylander for a top D idea is fluff.
- Zezel


Because it'd be stupid to trade Marner because he's the better player. Nylander is the one that is expendable.

Again, is Tampa Bay going to get Karlsson for Kucherov or will it be a package of prospects and picks?
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:28 AM ET
Because it'd be stupid to trade Marner because he's the better player. Nylander is the one that is expendable.

Again, is Tampa Bay going to get Karlsson for Kucherov or will it be a package of prospects and picks?

- Unholy_Goalie


I don't know what Karlsson will get, you tell me.
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:29 AM ET
420 blaze it hard
- twiztedmike

Lol
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

Jul 6 @ 1:31 AM ET
And that leads us back to......

Barkov, Ekblad, Matheson
for
Matthews and Gardiner

🤘

- mr.sir



Horrible deal for the Leafs
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:35 AM ET
I don't know what Karlsson will get, you tell me.
- Zezel


Probably a collection of picks, prospects and decent but expendable roster players. It's not going to cost them Hedman, Stamkos, Vasilevskiy and it's unlikely it'll cost them Kucherov. The core guys will stay. The core guys in Toronto are all forwards, one of them, the lesser of them (Nylander) is expendable.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:36 AM ET
Horrible deal for the Leafs
- Steven_Seagull


Barkov and Ekblad for Matthews would be robbery. It's debatable Matthews is even worth Ekblad.
Steven_Seagull
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mitch Marner sucks
Joined: 03.03.2016

Jul 6 @ 1:37 AM ET
Barkov and Ekblad for Matthews would be robbery. It's debatable Matthews is even worth Ekblad.
- Unholy_Goalie



oh
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:39 AM ET
Probably a collection of picks, prospects and decent but expendable roster players. It's not going to cost them Hedman, Stamkos, Vasilevskiy and it's unlikely it'll cost them Kucherov. The core guys will stay. The core guys in Toronto are all forwards, one of them, the lesser of them (Nylander) is expendable.
- Unholy_Goalie


Damn, that sounds good for Tampa. We should try doing something like that too.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:42 AM ET
Damn, that sounds good for Tampa. We should try doing something like that too.
- Zezel


It could cost them Kucherov, but if it doesn't, it should give the Leafs a good idea of what it would cost. Pretty strange that they're trading within the division though.

But Karlsson is a Norris winning defenseman. Acquiring somebody like Pietrangelo would cost less, something like Nylander+.
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:48 AM ET
So Tampa is going to acquire EK without trading a player of Nylander's quality, just a package of prospects and picks...interesting.
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON
Joined: 02.28.2011

Jul 6 @ 1:49 AM ET
Barkov and Ekblad for Matthews would be robbery. It's debatable Matthews is even worth Ekblad.
- Unholy_Goalie


Put down the crack pipe.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:51 AM ET
Put down the crack pipe.
- Zezel


Right. Matthews is worth McDavid + Crosby to the exponent Gretzky.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:52 AM ET
So Tampa is going to acquire EK without trading a player of Nylander's quality, just a package of prospects and picks...interesting.
- Zezel


Even if they did, it would be worth it both for them and for the Leafs.

Actually, even more for the Leafs because they don't have the D that Tampa Bay does which means the Leafs would be even more in need to acquire that type of defenseman.
Thecakeisalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Imagine something funny
Joined: 01.27.2010

Jul 6 @ 1:53 AM ET
So Tampa is going to acquire EK without trading a player of Nylander's quality, just a package of prospects and picks...interesting.
- Zezel


Admittedly it helps when Karlson has turned down an extension in Ottawa and therefor needs to be traded before he walks for nothing (ala Tavares) and he has supposedly stated he'll only sign an extension in Tampa... Although I just heard about the extension thing on here and don't know if it's actually true. If it does it sure helps Tampa make this trade since it gives them all the leverage.
Unholy_Goalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: usually UG offends everyone by telling the truth - dt99999, ON
Joined: 08.23.2006

Jul 6 @ 1:55 AM ET
Admittedly it helps when Karlson has turned down an extension in Ottawa and therefor needs to be traded before he walks for nothing (ala Tavares) and he has supposedly stated he'll only sign an extension in Tampa... Although I just heard about the extension thing on here and don't know if it's actually true. If it does it sure helps Tampa make this trade since it gives them all the leverage.
- Thecakeisalie


Whatever the situation is, if the Leafs can get a top pairing D for Nylander, they'd be stupid not to do it. You can't compete in the NHL playoffs without defense, especially now that Tampa Bay has a stacked blueline and the Leafs #1 D might not even crack their top-four.
Thecakeisalie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Imagine something funny
Joined: 01.27.2010

Jul 6 @ 1:58 AM ET
Right. Matthews is worth McDavid + Crosby to the exponent Gretzky.
- Unholy_Goalie


He said put down the crack pipe, not take another puff and then follow up with some ecstasy. Jeez!





Although I agree Matthews probably wouldn't be worth both Ekblad and Barkov. As a Leafs fan though, I'd be pretty torn if we made a trade like that.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40  Next