Thecakeisalie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Imagine something funny Joined: 01.27.2010
|
|
|
GTFO, man. G!T!F!O! - GreatGigInTheSky
|
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
Karlsson to St. Louis.
Pietrangelo to Toronto.
Picks, prospects, roster players to Ottawa. - Unholy_Goalie
A three way! ..kinky ..I like it ..ya something like the avalanche got (a boatload)..for dutch. .could possibly work? |
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
Gardiner wasn't solely at fault for game 7.
Andersen gave up some bad goals. The whole team failed to maintain pressure and defend the lead. The whole team has a piece of the blame.
Reality is, Gardiner is a 50+ point defender who was playing #1 minutes. Gardiner is not a #1 defender. When you put a #3 or #4 defender in the #1 role, bad things happen. It's like blaming Kadri for not scoring as much as Matthews if Kadri was playing in Matthews' spot. It's not because he's a bad player, it's just not his role. - Unholy_Goalie
Yep. .if they don't have a proper rh dman to cover the high risk high reward Gardiner ..then he's in trouble as we seen. .but I agree that they should trade him..and concentrate on a righty for Reilly |
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
D for Carolina:
J. Faulk
H. Fleury
D. Hamilton
B. Pesce
J. Slavin
C De Haan - BreathLeafs2015
That's not counting what they have in the pipeline. .that's ready to take the next step! ...including McKeown...and Jake bean ..plus they have tvr
|
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
MR.Hunter
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.22.2016
|
|
|
Yeah, it gave me the feels.
I might've complained about him when he was placed in a role he wasn't suited for or for being poopty defensively, but there's certainly nothing to complain about his character as a person or his joy at being a Leaf.
I think one of the most poignant things I've seen in hockey is that clip where he's at the glass and his wife is holding his child there with a #42 DADDY jersey on and he's smiling at them. Guy was happy to be on the team and certainly tried his best.
I wish him and JVR success and happiness where ever they go. - Thecakeisalie
St . Louis and Philly? ..I thigk I'b..derunk |
|
BlueBallz
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: You lie to everyone else and soon enough you begin believing your own lies. - spatso, ON Joined: 07.06.2012
|
|
|
Thank (frank)!
Best news the Leafs coulda gotten. - GreatGigInTheSky
Better than dumping Martin with no salary retained? |
|
|
|
Hyman - Tavares - Marner
Marleau - Matthews - Nylander
X - Kadri - Brown
Johnsson - X- Kapanen
13th: Gauthier (not waivers exempt?)
Rielly - X
Dermott - Hainsey
Borgman - Zaitsev
7th: Holl / Carrick (not waivers exempt) or Ozhiganov
Andersen
McElhinney
Sparks/Pickard/X
Leafs could just go with 3 goalies to start the season - since most of their AHL'ers are waivers exempt (Ozhiganov, Liljegren, Rosen, Lindholm, Moore, Grundstrom, Marchment etc.). That creates alot of options for the Leafs.
Not sure if the waivers information I have is correct though.
3rd line LW options:
4th line C options: Lindhold maybe, but he's waiver exempt. Might not make the cut in preseason and first starting on Marlies.
1st pairing D-man options:
potential backup goalie options: Anderson (he'd be #2 and then no need to keep McSavey), Dansk, Darling.
Leivo, Gardiner, Pickard, Sparks, Gauthier, Holl, Marincin, Carrick should be made available for trades since not waivers exempt.
My guess is that Borgman / Rosen / Ozhiganov are kept just because they don't need to go through waivers, which is a key plus for them. I could see the Leafs following this pattern going forward and adding every year 3-4 players to fill out the bottom fw and d lines with waiver exempt Europeans.
Question is which team would be interested in Gardiner + Carrick + Sparks + 1st rounder for a topline defenseman. I don't think there are a lot of options around..
I wonder whether LV could be a trading partner (smaller trade including a guy like Leivo or Gauthier).
Most interesting option I could see would be a trade with Carolina, and take some salary of their hands in order to get the D-upgrade required:
Carolina:
Darling + Pesce / Slavin
Toronto:
Sparks/McSavey/Pickard + Leivo + Carrick + 2nd rounder
It's basically helping Carolina get rid of the Darling contract, and would give Toronto a better backup option.
It would give Carolina a backup goalie, and a young bottom line D-man and a 3rd/4th line wing in Leivo.
Would save Carolina about 8million in caphit and salary - that's important for that team.
I don't think Carolina would want Gardiner.
But if they would be interested (if they can trade Faulk to another team, that would be a possibility), the optimal trade for leafs would be:
Darling + Pesce/Slavin + Skinner
for
Gardiner + Leivo + Carrick + 2nd + McSavey/Pickard/Sparks
Toronto takes on salary (approx 8mln) but can still fit that under the cap easily.
Next season would be a question mark, but at least they would save 1 - 2million vs the new Gardiner contract (Slavin/Pesce comparison).
Worst case scenario, Leafs need to let Skinner go after next season if they can't afford him.
Since Leafs were going to probably lose Gardiner anyways, better to have an upgrade on D and fill in that LW spot with a great player for 1 year, vs having Gardiner there.
Hyman - Tavares - Marner
Skinner - Matthews - Nylander
Marleau - Kadri - Brown
Johnsson - Lindholm - Kapanen
13th: Gauthier
Rielly - Pesce/Slavin
Dermott - Hainsey
Borgman - Zaitsev
7th: Holl / Ozhiganov
Andersen
Darling
Sparks/Pickard/McSavey
|
|
Santo_44
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Joined: 10.20.2014
|
|
|
Leafs have 16.2 mil in space+5 million LTIR
trade for Faulk, offer Nash a one year 6.5 million dollar contract....he won't want to retire then. |
|
jimi james
|
|
|
Location: Somewhere Between Joined: 07.17.2010
|
|
|
Why do I keep thinking that UG is Glen Healey |
|
winsix
Season Ticket Holder Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Henry Hudson's Fairchild 24 South Porcupine Joined: 04.03.2016
|
|
|
Better than dumping Martin with no salary retained? - BlueBallz
Signed Tavares .................. Check
Dumped Martin.....................Check
Trade coming with Habs:
rights to Nathan Horton plus a 2nd for Kenny Augustino + 7th |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Faulk is very much in play, but I think the asking price has been Nylander, because of the stupid Larsson/Hall trade, which is (frank)ing up the market until somebody sets a new precedent.
Faulk for Brown or Kapanen and some picks is probably where it needs to be, but might have to cough up a D prospect too like Rosen. - gravyface
The lars/hall deal was years ago and a bad trade made by a desperate team. I dont believe it sets the market. |
|
Fakepartofme
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Living rent free... in your head, ON Joined: 09.20.2010
|
|
|
Definitely, suckers passing Go thinking they can keep their $200. Bltch please, you done owe me for landing on Baltic Ave. - PatC80
Bahaha |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
They won't get anyone of that quality for him so the price will lower. - Archaic
Yeah... or they can just keep him and roll out a D of
Slavin-Hamilton
De Haan-Pesce
Fleury-Faulk
It's an expensive D corps, but they have the space and no reason to rush and make a deal that doesn't give them the return they want. |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
Hyman - Tavares - Marner
Marleau - Matthews - Nylander
X - Kadri - Brown
Johnsson - X- Kapanen
13th: Gauthier (not waivers exempt?)
Rielly - X
Dermott - Hainsey
Borgman - Zaitsev
7th: Holl / Carrick (not waivers exempt) or Ozhiganov
Andersen
McElhinney
Sparks/Pickard/X
Leafs could just go with 3 goalies to start the season - since most of their AHL'ers are waivers exempt (Ozhiganov, Liljegren, Rosen, Lindholm, Moore, Grundstrom, Marchment etc.). That creates alot of options for the Leafs.
Not sure if the waivers information I have is correct though.
3rd line LW options:
4th line C options: Lindhold maybe, but he's waiver exempt. Might not make the cut in preseason and first starting on Marlies.
1st pairing D-man options:
potential backup goalie options: Anderson (he'd be #2 and then no need to keep McSavey), Dansk, Darling.
Leivo, Gardiner, Pickard, Sparks, Gauthier, Holl, Marincin, Carrick should be made available for trades since not waivers exempt.
My guess is that Borgman / Rosen / Ozhiganov are kept just because they don't need to go through waivers, which is a key plus for them. I could see the Leafs following this pattern going forward and adding every year 3-4 players to fill out the bottom fw and d lines with waiver exempt Europeans.
Question is which team would be interested in Gardiner + Carrick + Sparks + 1st rounder for a topline defenseman. I don't think there are a lot of options around..
I wonder whether LV could be a trading partner (smaller trade including a guy like Leivo or Gauthier).
Most interesting option I could see would be a trade with Carolina, and take some salary of their hands in order to get the D-upgrade required:
Carolina:
Darling + Pesce / Slavin
Toronto:
Sparks/McSavey/Pickard + Leivo + Carrick + 2nd rounder
It's basically helping Carolina get rid of the Darling contract, and would give Toronto a better backup option.
It would give Carolina a backup goalie, and a young bottom line D-man and a 3rd/4th line wing in Leivo.
Would save Carolina about 8million in caphit and salary - that's important for that team.
I don't think Carolina would want Gardiner.
But if they would be interested (if they can trade Faulk to another team, that would be a possibility), the optimal trade for leafs would be:
Darling + Pesce/Slavin + Skinner
for
Gardiner + Leivo + Carrick + 2nd + McSavey/Pickard/Sparks
Toronto takes on salary (approx 8mln) but can still fit that under the cap easily.
Next season would be a question mark, but at least they would save 1 - 2million vs the new Gardiner contract (Slavin/Pesce comparison).
Worst case scenario, Leafs need to let Skinner go after next season if they can't afford him.
Since Leafs were going to probably lose Gardiner anyways, better to have an upgrade on D and fill in that LW spot with a great player for 1 year, vs having Gardiner there.
Hyman - Tavares - Marner
Skinner - Matthews - Nylander
Marleau - Kadri - Brown
Johnsson - Lindholm - Kapanen
13th: Gauthier
Rielly - Pesce/Slavin
Dermott - Hainsey
Borgman - Zaitsev
7th: Holl / Ozhiganov
Andersen
Darling
Sparks/Pickard/McSavey - MaximusAurelius
No thank you.
We can't take on that many contracts anyway. We'll just trade Faulk. Not Pesce or Slavin. |
|
Archaic
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Waterloo, ON Joined: 01.12.2011
|
|
|
Leafs have 16.2 mil in space+5 million LTIR
trade for Faulk, offer Nash a one year 6.5 million dollar contract....he won't want to retire then. - Santo_44
The Leafs dont want to use the LTIR this year if possible as it has cap implications for next year. I doubt they use any of it. If possible they will want to keep some cap to not have bonus overages seep into next year. |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
The lars/hall deal was years ago and a bad trade made by a desperate team. I dont believe it sets the market. - Fakepartofme
It comes up a lot in media circles, but as to what the GMs think: who knows.
Karlsson will be an interesting trade (and a trade that really shouldn't happen if OTT wasn't a pack of clowns). |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Gardiner is Jekyll and Hyde
When he’s on his game he’s lights out one of the best
When he’s not on his game you’d swear he’s out to lunch. - BreathLeafs2015
Let's not get too carried away here. I do believe his lights are out some times...but I think we're using a different meaning. |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
Yeah... or they can just keep him and roll out a D of
Slavin-Hamilton
De Haan-Pesce
Fleury-Faulk
It's an expensive D corps, but they have the space and no reason to rush and make a deal that doesn't give them the return they want. - BINGO!
That's a pretty sexy right side. Sexiest in the league maybe? Do you really think that Hamilton's above Faulk? His numbers look really good, even the fancy pants stats, but is he a Mike Green in his prime kind of PP QB? I don't watch much CAR games. |
|
Archaic
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Waterloo, ON Joined: 01.12.2011
|
|
|
Yeah... or they can just keep him and roll out a D of
Slavin-Hamilton
De Haan-Pesce
Fleury-Faulk
It's an expensive D corps, but they have the space and no reason to rush and make a deal that doesn't give them the return they want. - BINGO!
Absolutely, but I doubt it. You guys also have TVR, and others waiting. I do think they want to trade him though. All I am saying is there is no way in holy hell Faulk is fetching a quality player like Nylander. He's not that level of a player. JMHO.
I wouldnt mind trading for a player ready to take the next step from Carolina. |
|
|
|
Leafs have 16.2 mil in space+5 million LTIR
trade for Faulk, offer Nash a one year 6.5 million dollar contract....he won't want to retire then. - Santo_44
I think they have less space available - performance bonuses might add to 3-5million and they definitely do not want to have those bonuses on 2019-2020 caphit.
So expect the Leafs to only work with additional 11million or so in additions/trades/signings.
There was an issue as well with LTIR/performance bonusses, but not too sure how that exactly worked; I expect that Leafs might want to keep quite a bit of capspace, and not even use the LTIR.
Although I think the LTIR issue was that you cannot have more capspace committed (capspace + LTIR) for coming season that total max caphit - with Hainsey and Gardiner being UFAs, that doesn't seem to be an issue.
16million - 5million (performance bonuses).
11million.
Sign Nylander 6.75 million - 4.25million left.
That's for 19 players.
So still need to add 2-3 players to that (I expect Leafs to not go with a 23 man roster, but 21-22 instead).
3 players at 1million: Johnsson and a 7th D and a 13th FW.
that would leave a bit over 1million left, without using LTIR. I understand that last year Lou indicated that LTIR could be used during season as well, but not sure where that discussion ended.
If so (or if Leafs trade that Horton contract), Leafs could still add player(s) worth 6million of caphit, keeping enough room for the expected bonuses.
|
|
bryant
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.28.2011
|
|
|
Absolutely, but I doubt it. You guys also have TVR, and others waiting. I do think they want to trade him though. All I am saying is there is no way in holy hell Faulk is fetching a quality player like Nylander. He's not that level of a player. JMHO.
I wouldnt mind trading for a player ready to take the next step from Carolina. - Archaic
Agree Faulk and nylander aren’t on the same level. There is a reason they’re floating Faulk |
|
|
|
No thank you.
We can't take on that many contracts anyway. We'll just trade Faulk. Not Pesce or Slavin. - BINGO!
Let's make a bet that Toronto takes one of Slavin / Pesce. |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
That's a pretty sexy right side. Sexiest in the league maybe? Do you really think that Hamilton's above Faulk? His numbers look really good, even the fancy pants stats, but is he a Mike Green in his prime kind of PP QB? I don't watch much CAR games. - gravyface
Hamilton is way better in his own end.
Faulk has a cannon of a shot but has been extremely poor positionally for a couple years now. |
|