New roomer



Adam Fox one of Flames decent RHD
- senstroll

supposedly he doesn't want to sign with a canadian team

michael stone is terrible

I'm afraid you are confusing your Chiarelli mistakes.

The trading Hall mistake is not the same as the overpaying Draistl mistake.

Totally different Chiarelli mistakes.

But hey, I'm not trying to embarrass you here: there are so many Chiarelli mistakes, it's hard to keep them all straight in your mind.
- Atomic Wedgie

Not sure what trading Draistl for Parayko has to do with his salary, but im on board with Chia trading players, as it always is good for some fun

Sign Stastny, trade #25 pick in a package for Parayko, if St. Louis is interested in moving him
- PatC80

I can see The Geek moving the 25th pic for two 2nds or a 2nd and 3rd.

supposedly he doesn't want to sign with a canadian team

michael stone is terrible
- Tumbleweed

Racialist!

What time does the draft start? Anyone have a stream option?

I can see The Geek moving the 25th pic for two 2nds or a 2nd and 3rd.
- Fakepartofme

not that bad of an idea.. Unless someone ranked in the top 10 falls to 25th, it's a good idea to try to get more lottery tickets

What time does the draft start? Anyone have a stream option?
- Garnie

Draft Schmaft.

not that bad of an idea.. Unless someone ranked in the top 10 falls to 25th, it's a good idea to try to get more lottery tickets
- PatC80

Fuk loading up on picks..Are we starting a rebuild again. Trade all the picks for D help now not 4yrs down the road .. ..




Sorry for being angry..

Draft Schmaft.
- Atomic Wedgie

Trade them all, just sign UFA's for needs every year.

Here for u buggers that didn't know..

Toronto Maple Leafs @MapleLeafs
3m
How we’re picking | #NHLDraft

⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️

Round 1 | Pick 25
Round 2 | Pick 52
Round 3 | Pick 83
Round 4 | Pick 118
Round 5 | Pick 149
Round 7 | Pick 209
Round 7 | Pick 211

Trade them all, just sign UFA's for needs every year.
- Garnie

YES

not that bad of an idea.. Unless someone ranked in the top 10 falls to 25th, it's a good idea to try to get more lottery tickets
- PatC80

So I’ve partially read some of the draft articles on theathletic. Here is the 100% official leafs draft strategy:

Trade up for (18-20):
Kravstov
Rasmus Sandin


Take:
Merkley

Trade down and try to get one (or more) of:
Bokk
Iasac Lundestrom
Kupari
Kaut
Jonatan Berggren
Lundqvist
Akil Thomas
Calen Addison

not that bad of an idea.. Unless someone ranked in the top 10 falls to 25th, it's a good idea to try to get more lottery tickets
- PatC80

Meh, we're not rebuilding. Get the best player available or move it for D. Enough with the quantity crap.

So I’ve partially read some of the draft articles on theathletic. Here is the 100% official leafs draft strategy:

Trade up for (18-20):
Kravstov
Rasmus Sandin


Take:
Merkley

Trade down and try to get one (or more) of:
Bokk
Iasac Lundestrom
Kupari
Kaut
Jonatan Berggren
Lundqvist
Akil Thomas
Calen Addison
- Tumbleweed

Do you fellas honestly know (or even care at this point) about all these names?

I confess I don't follow junior hockey at all. I barely remember that Canada won the U-19s this year.

So I just find it funny that fans talk about trading up or down 3 spots in the draft - like, how the frank do you even begin to figure out if it's worth it or not?

So I’ve partially read some of the draft articles on theathletic. Here is the 100% official leafs draft strategy:

Trade up for (18-20):
Kravstov
Rasmus Sandin


Take:
Merkley

Trade down and try to get one (or more) of:
Bokk
Iasac Lundestrom
Kupari
Kaut
Jonatan Berggren
Lundqvist
Akil Thomas
Calen Addison
- Tumbleweed

So what you're saying is that they're going to trade up, stand pat or trade down?

Guess Dreger was right after all.

There must be a limit to how many prospects you can have in the system?

Trade down to get more picks, then later trade away 5 players to get under the 50 man contract limit. Seems like a dog chasing his tail....hire better scouts and take the BPA.

There must be a limit to how many prospects you can have in the system?

Trade down to get more picks, then later trade away 5 players to get under the 50 man contract limit. Seems like a dog chasing his tail....hire better scouts and take the BPA.
- Garnie

- Fruitcakenipple

flagged for sarcasm

Do you fellas honestly know (or even care at this point) about all these names?

I confess I don't follow junior hockey at all. I barely remember that Canada won the U-19s this year.

So I just find it funny that fans talk about trading up or down 3 spots in the draft - like, how the frank do you even begin to figure out if it's worth it or not?
- Atomic Wedgie

I read a great article by Travis Yost about this exact thing a couple years ago. You should give it a read.

Do you fellas honestly know (or even care at this point) about all these names?

I confess I don't follow junior hockey at all. I barely remember that Canada won the U-19s this year.

So I just find it funny that fans talk about trading up or down 3 spots in the draft - like, how the frank do you even begin to figure out if it's worth it or not?
- Atomic Wedgie

No.
But its fun to watch people pretend they know and care.

flagged for sarcasm
- Garnie

- Fruitcakenipple

There must be a limit to how many prospects you can have in the system?

Trade down to get more picks, then later trade away 5 players to get under the 50 man contract limit. Seems like a dog chasing his tail....hire better scouts and take the BPA.
- Garnie

Agreed

Do you fellas honestly know (or even care at this point) about all these names?

I confess I don't follow junior hockey at all. I barely remember that Canada won the U-19s this year.

So I just find it funny that fans talk about trading up or down 3 spots in the draft - like, how the frank do you even begin to figure out if it's worth it or not?
- Atomic Wedgie

i partially read some of the draft articles on the theathletic.

i consider myself the official expert on here now.

i partially read some of the draft articles on the theathletic.

i consider myself the official expert on here now.
- Tumbleweed

You're not the only one.