There's a chance those 4 could all be gone.
- NorthNuck

So then it is Dobson Bouchard or Boqvist and I am okay with all of them . I prefer a forward but that does not mean I am disappomted if any of the others are taken

That is why you are not a GM , painter,welder, carpenter ,life gaurd or taken seriously

- VANTEL

You're right.
I'm a life guard.

1. What team is selling a bad short contract now the cap is at 80 mil? There has yet to be a buyout either.

2. A few posters here today willing to trade Tanev for a second round pick . I think it is wrong x3

3.Eventually you need to make some moves aside from drafting . We have moved the old players now it's time to siphon out the tweeners.

4. Some people in here are so Tunnel Vision on what the draft pick has to be example Pres . Boqvist . Don and others Dobson. Keep the options open .

5. I sort of made it up but name one trade proposal in here over the last 5 years that half the people don't hate

- VANTEL

1. I don't know, I'm not an NHL GM
2. Trading Tanev for a 2nd is wrong, no argument there
3. Agreed, just not all of them on the first day of the draft
4. I'd be happy with Walhstrom or Dobson or anyone who might 'fall'
5. There is never consensus in here that's what makes the woodpile so vital

You're right.
I'm a life guard.

- Pres.cup

Gramm Fuzz out

1. I don't know, I'm not an NHL GM
2. Trading Tanev for a 2nd is wrong, no argument there
3. Agreed, just not all of them on the first day of the draft
4. I'd be happy with Walhstrom or Dobson or anyone who might 'fall'
5. There is never consensus in here that's what makes the woodpile so vital
- Marwood

I have the wife making me one

Bachman signed for 2 years . Official now

1. I don't know, I'm not an NHL GM
2. Trading Tanev for a 2nd is wrong, no argument there
3. Agreed, just not all of them on the first day of the draft
4. I'd be happy with Walhstrom or Dobson or anyone who might 'fall'
5. There is never consensus in here that's what makes the woodpile so vital
- Marwood

Love is what keeps us together.

One of Wahlstrom Zadina or Tkachuk has to be available if not it is Hughes
- VANTEL

Canucks dont want Hughes or Whalstrom from the sounds of it. We are going D unless Zadina or Tkachuk falls

Canucks dont want Hughes or Whalstrom from the sounds of it. We are going D unless Zadina or Tkachuk falls
- CanuckDon

If Hughes and Tkachuk are there who do you go with?

1. What team is selling a bad short contract now the cap is at 80 mil? There has yet to be a buyout either.

2. A few posters here today willing to trade Tanev for a second round pick . I think it is wrong x3

3.Eventually you need to make some moves aside from drafting . We have moved the old players now it's time to siphon out the tweeners.

4. Some people in here are so Tunnel Vision on what the draft pick has to be example Pres . Boqvist . Don and others Dobson. Keep the options open .

5. I sort of made it up but name one trade proposal in here over the last 5 years that half the people don't hate

- VANTEL

I don’t have tunnel vision with Dobson lol. Perhaps I haven’t been clear with my 4500 post on this subject. I don’t (frank)ING want boqvist. Anyone else is fine

I don’t have tunnel vision with Dobson lol. Perhaps I haven’t been clear with my 4500 post on this subject. I don’t (frank)ING want boqvist. Anyone else is fine
- CanuckDon

maybe it was North Nuck

I have the wife making me one
- VANTEL

They are quite zen.
Mine has a lava lamp, Persian rugs and bees wax candles made by unwashed hippies from Salts Spring Island. And a jesus fish tambourine for my musical friends.

Canucks dont want Hughes or Whalstrom from the sounds of it. We are going D unless Zadina or Tkachuk falls
- CanuckDon

I was talking to Cam Robinson he said Wahlstrom is going to score a lot of goals

If Hughes and Tkachuk are there who do you go with?
- thundachunk

Tkachuk...only because Hughes sounds like he has a sh!t attitude. Rumblings are the interview with the Canucks was real bad. So (frank)off runt. Attitude aside, Hughes is clearly more talented

Canucks dont want Hughes or Whalstrom from the sounds of it. We are going D unless Zadina or Tkachuk falls
- CanuckDon

That's what i believe as well.

Zadina/Tkatchuk, If Dobson is taken and the cards all fall in our favour...therefore, unlikely. Or else Dobson/Bouchard/Boqvist

i hope for Dobson.
Bouchard is my conciliation prize and probably the most likely scenario.

3. Tkatchuk
4. Dobson
5. Zadina
6. Hughes
7. Bouchard.
8. Whalstrom

They are quite zen.
Mine has a lava lamp, Persian rugs and bees wax candles made by unwashed hippies from Salts Spring Island. And a jesus fish tambourine for my musical friends.
- Marwood

maybe it was North Nuck

- VANTEL

Sounds about right. That guy is the worst sometimes 😡😡

I was talking to Cam Robinson he said Wahlstrom is going to score a lot of goals
- VANTEL

I like him, just haven’t got the sense the Canucks feel the same way. But what do I know, I’m just an overweight, 75 year old Walmart greeter

1. What team is selling a bad short contract now the cap is at 80 mil? There has yet to be a buyout either.

2. A few posters here today willing to trade Tanev for a second round pick . I think it is wrong x3

3.Eventually you need to make some moves aside from drafting . We have moved the old players now it's time to siphon out the tweeners.

4. Some people in here are so Tunnel Vision on what the draft pick has to be example Pres . Boqvist . Don and others Dobson. Keep the options open .

5. I sort of made it up but name one trade proposal in here over the last 5 years that half the people don't hate

- VANTEL

1. Any team, look at what SJ just did.

2. So you're setting the price of tanev at 3x2nd round picks. Fair value, I'd give him away with Eriksson or trade him for two seconds and a high third.

3. The drafted players are developing and will push the defenders down the lineup, this takes time. I know that you want the quick fix but signing more vrabatas and Erikssons isn't going to fix the problem, long term, stick to the process.

4. Boqvist isn't my number one pick, I'd just rather risk his upside vs. Dobson's limited upside, even considering the fact that Dodson is safe. It's not nice to pick on Donald, even if he's so into safety that he uses condom to masterbate.

5. Eriksson straight up for Karlsson and a 2nd. Name one poster who wouldn't like that trade proposal.

Boom goes the dynamite.

Tkachuk...only because Hughes sounds like he has a sh!t attitude. Rumblings are the interview with the Canucks was real bad. So (frank)off runt. Attitude aside, Hughes is clearly more talented
- CanuckDon

I like Hughes because of the risk but I worry he will be McCann2.0.

Draft starts in 48 hrs.










The freak out in 49.

Gramm Fuzz out
- VANTEL

I like him, just haven’t got the sense the Canucks feel the same way. But what do I know, I’m just an overweight, 75 year old Walmart greeter
- CanuckDon

I would take Wahlstrom in a heartbeat.

Usage gets overlooked so badly by some people.

Sutter and Gaunce handled themselves well given their usage this year. A lot of other forwards on this roster would have gotten lit up if given the same roles.
- Nucker101

He has to prove he's a 2nd liner before he's good enough for the 4rth. Can't you see the logic?

I would take Wahlstrom in a heartbeat.
- thundachunk

He'd be good.
We need D though.

Zadina/Tkatchuk or D.