Elliotte Friedman
‏Verified account @FriedgeHNIC
19s19 seconds ago

Commissioner says expectation of cap is between $79.5 and $80M, although nothing firm yet

Habs will overpay... 7y X $7-7.5M.
- Mashadar

I'm sure he'll still be worth it at 39 lol

I could deal with Stastny more so than O'Reilly cause the prior obviously wouldn't cost any assets but I wouldn't do any higher than 3 years @ 6... But what are the odds he signs for that?

I'm sure he'll still be worth it at 39 lol

I could deal with Stastny more so than O'Reilly cause the prior obviously wouldn't cost any assets but I wouldn't do any higher than 3 years @ 6... But what are the odds he signs for that?
- obie

same here. 3 years no problem.
so welcome back Pleky!

FFS - the whole is Juulsen a left or right D was more interesting than this poop.
- Mashadar

Thank you.

I'm sure he'll still be worth it at 39 lol

I could deal with Stastny more so than O'Reilly cause the prior obviously wouldn't cost any assets but I wouldn't do any higher than 3 years @ 6... But what are the odds he signs for that?
- obie

Will probably be a 5 year deal. But I still expect it to be over $7M/year

That's why they tell you they don't like it, you got them all confused!
- obie

Speaking of confused... just found a video of you and your gang

I'm sure he'll still be worth it at 39 lol

I could deal with Stastny more so than O'Reilly cause the prior obviously wouldn't cost any assets but I wouldn't do any higher than 3 years @ 6... But what are the odds he signs for that?
- obie

Statsny 53 points with blues and jets
ROR 61 with the Bufalols

oh boy..

Speaking of confused... just found a video of you and your gang

video
- WaterBoy

Nice girlfriend thought!

same here. 3 years no problem.
so welcome back Pleky!
- fidopro

Along with another high pick next year

oh boy..
- pete26

Statsny 53 points with blues and jets
ROR 61 with the Bufalols
- WaterBoy

Suprisingly enough you missed the point! You know, where it says Stastny won't cost any assets!

Suprisingly enough you missed the point! You know, where it says Stastny won't cost any assets!
- obie

Stastny won't cost any assets indeed.

Stastny will be overpaid for what he brings.

I'd rather have ROR over Stastny.

Was simply pointing out the stats between the 2 players.

Nice girlfriend thought!


- WaterBoy

You're dedicating quite a bit of time on this little cyber beef, I think you might have a crush on me!

Stastny won't cost any assets indeed.

Stastny will be overpaid for what he brings.

I'd rather have ROR over Stastny.

Was simply pointing out the stats between the 2 players.
- WaterBoy

Thanks tips, cause you know we don't get hockey stats on the internet here in Oshawa

- WaterBoy

Looks like me except I bat left like Juulsen

Thanks tips, cause you know we don't get hockey stats on the internet here in Oshawa
- obie

With your logic, we could sign Bozak or Thornton or Riley Nash without giving any assets.

Looks like me except I bat left like Juulsen
- Fredobbface

You bat whatever you can

With your logic, we could sign Bozak or Thornton or Riley Nash without giving any assets.
- WaterBoy

That's not my logic, it's just how it works... It's called free agency

Will probably be a 5 year deal. But I still expect it to be over $7M/year
- Mashadar

if by signing him it also means we don't sign back Plekanec, I say its a win

And there will be something with seeing Stastny in the back of an Habs jersey

That's not my logic, it's just how it works... It's called free agency
- obie

So you would rather have an older player with less offensive output as your #1 center?

I see.

Will probably be a 5 year deal. But I still expect it to be over $7M/year
- Mashadar

Yup.

So you would rather have an older player with less offensive output as your #1 center?

I see.
- WaterBoy

Who's talking about #1C? I thought we were debating between O'Reilly and Stastny?

Who's talking about #1C? I thought we were debating between O'Reilly and Stastny?
- obie

Ok, that was funny.



ROR is a #1 C
Statsny falls under 2C and might not put up better numbers than Plek in a couple of years from now.

Ok, that was funny.



ROR is a #1 C
Statsny falls under 2C and might not put up better numbers than Plek in a couple of years from now.
- WaterBoy

How many teams would he be #1 on? Cause he's not on the dead last team in the NHL and the reason he's available is because he's about to fall to #3